Alleima GmbHWerther (Westf.)Befreiender Konzernabschluss zum Geschäftsjahr vom 01.01.2024 bis zum 31.12.2024Alleima ABSandviken/SchwedenFinancial-informationDirectors’ report Risks and risk management Financial information and notes Consolidated financial information Group notes Parent company financial information Parent company notes Auditor’s report Directors’ reportSummary Financial overview - Group scroll
Notes to the reader: Tables and cal-culations in the report do not always agree exactly with the totals due to rounding. Comparisons refer to the corresponding period last year, unless otherwise stated. Adjusted operating profit (EBIT) excludes items affecting comparability (IAC) and metal price effects, see Note 2 and description of Alternative Performance Measures on pages 130-131 for further details. Definitions and glossary can be found on www.alleima.com/investors. 1) The annual number is based on a four quarter -average. Market development Market development for full-year 2024 was mixed for the various customer segments. Demand in mainly Nuclear and Medical remained high and increased compared with the corresponding period last year. Demand in the Oil and Gas segment was stable. Demand in the Chemical and Petrochemical, Industrial Heating and Industrial segments weakened slightly. Order intake and revenues Order intake decreased by 10% to SEK 19,419 million (21,684), with organic growth of -6%. The development was mainly attributable to a lower order intake in the Oil and Gas segment of the Tube division, compared to last year’s strong build-up of the order book. The regions of North America and Asia noted organic order intake growth of 32% and 9%, respectively. The region Europe noted organic order intake growth of -19%. Revenues decreased by 5% to SEK 19,691 million (20,669), with organic growth of 1%. The Tube Division grew organically, mainly driven by deliveries to the Oil and Gas, Nuclear and Transportation segments, while the Industrial segment recorded a decline. Kanthal noted a decline mainly in the Industrial and Industrial heating segments, while Medical accounted for a positive development. Strip noted a slightly negative development. Book-to-bill was 99%. The backlog remained solid with a good product mix. Structure had an impact of 0%, while currency had an impact of -1% on both order intake and revenues. Alloy surcharges had an impact of -4% on both order intake and revenues. Orderingång och intäkter scroll
Earnings Gross profit Cost of goods sold decreased by 2% to 15,740 million (16,090), driven by decreased sales volumes, changed product mix and increased cost for intermediate goods. Gross profit decreased by 14% to SEK 3,951 million (4,579), corresponding to a gross margin of 20.1% (22.2). The decrease was primarily driven by negative metal price effects. Sales, administrative and R&D costs Selling expenses decreased by 3% to SEK 1,250 million (1,288). Administrative expenses amounted to SEK 975 million (973). Research and development costs increased by 15% to SEK 292 million (255), primary due to higher activity in a few prioritized development projects. Other operating income and expenses amounted to SEK 64 million (-16), mainly driven by positive currency effects. Operating profit (EBIT) Adjusted EBIT decreased by 9% to SEK 1,944 million (2,141) corresponding to a margin of 9.9% (10.4). Currency had a negative impact of SEK 11 million year on year. Depreciation and amortization amounted to SEK -913 million (-911). Reported EBIT amounted to SEK 1,498 million (2,046), corresponding to a margin of 7.6% (9.9). Metal price effects had a negative impact of SEK -446 million (-95). scroll
Financial items Net financial items were SEK 73 million (28). The change was due primarily to improvements in interest net. Taxes Income tax expense amounted to SEK 350 million (500), corresponding to an effective tax rate of 22.3% (24.1). See Note 10 Income tax for more information. Profit Profit for the period amounted to SEK 1,221 million (1,574), corresponding to earnings per share, diluted, of SEK 4.87 (6.27). Adjusted profit for the period amounted to SEK 1,573 million (1,647) and adjusted earnings per share, diluted, amounted to SEK 6,27 (6.56). See page 130 for further details. Financial position, capital resources and l i quidity Capital employed Capital employed excluding cash increased to SEK 15,983 million (15,533). The increase was mainly attributable to growth investments and fx effects. Return on capital employed excluding cash decreased to 9.5% (12.9). Working capital Net working capital amounted to SEK 6,821 million (6,825). Net working capital in relation to revenues was 35.1% (34.3). Capital expenditure Capex amounted to SEK -1,190 million (-815), corresponding to 130.4% (89.5) of scheduled depreciation and -6.0% (-3.9) of revenues. The increase was mainly attributable to growth investments. Cash flow Cash flow from operating activities declined to SEK 2,123 million (2,234). Free operating cash flow declined to SEK 1,266 million (1,688). The change was primarily attributable to lower operating profit and growth investments. Free operating cash flow scroll
1) Free operating cash flow before acquisitions and disposals of companies, net financial items and paid taxes. Funding and liquidity On December 31 2024, SEK 1,912 million (1,595) was reported as Cash and Cash equivalents, whereof SEK 1,229 million (1,021) in cash directly available for Group Treasury and SEK 683 million (574) is restricted cash such as short-term deposits and cash accounts with, for Group Treasury, limited access. The short-term deposits are considered as cash equivalent as they have a time to maturity of less than 3 months. Net debt amounted to SEK -631 million (-242), i.e. a net cash position. Net debt in relation to equity was -0.04x (-0.02). The financial net debt position was SEK -1,911 million (-1,590). Net pension liability decreased year on year to SEK 820 million (843). Net debt in relation to rolling 12-month adjusted EBITDA was -0.22x (-0.08). During 2024, Alleima has prolonged the revolving credit facility of SEK 3,000 million one year by utilizing the last one-year prolongation option, extending the facility to 2029. On December 31, 2024, available credit facilities were unutilized. The short-term liquidity reserve, comprising committed credit facilities and accessible cash and cash equivalents was SEK 4,229 million (3,908). See Note 26 for further information. Share and share capital As of December 31, 2024 Alleima’s share capital amounted to SEK 250,877,184 represented by 250,877,184 shares. Alleima’s General Meeting held on May 2, 2024 approved the Board’s proposal for a long-term share-based incentive program (LTI 2024). As of December 31, 2024, LTI 2023 and LTI 2024 comprises 687,758 share rights. The delivery of these shares is secured through equity swap agreement with a third party. The Annual General Meeting held on May 2, 2024, resolved for the financial year 2023 on an ordinary dividend of SEK 2.00 (1.40) per share. The dividend of SEK 502 million (351) was distributed to the shareholders on May 10, 2024. Significant events in 2024
Significant events after year-end 2024
Significant agreements The manufacture and sale of rock drill steel products is a business segment (the ”RDS business”) within Alleima with multiple customers, including subsidiaries in the Sandvik group. The RDS business is operated by Alleima Rock Drill Steel AB (the “RDS company”). 10% of the shares in the RDS company are held by Sandvik AB and the remaining shares are held by Alleima EMEA AB. The co-ownership is regulated in a shareholders’ agreement to which the owners are party. The terms of the shareholders’ agreement provides Sandvik AB with certain protective rights, including a call option which Sandvik AB may exercise upon, e.g., a change of control in Alleima AB, whereby an owner, who was not a major shareholder at the time of signing of the agreement, gains control of 30 per cent or more of all votes in the company, and which call option provides Sandvik AB with a right to purchase Alleima EMEA AB’s shares in the RDS company at fair market value. Upon exercise of the call option and Sandvik AB’s subsequent purchase of Alleima EMEA AB’s shares, the shareholders’ agreement will lapse. As a change of control that causes the call option to become exercisable may be a public take-over offer, the shareholders’ agreement is deemed such a significant agreement as is intended by the Annual Reports Act (1995:1554) Chapter 6 section 2 item 9. Workforce The number of employees at year-end was 6,309 (6,110). Wages, salaries, and other remunerations for the year totaled SEK 3,858 million (3,577). The number of third-party workers at year-end was 516 (596). Alleima guidelines for the remuneration of senior executives The Alleima guidelines for the remuneration of senior executives is described in the Corporate governance section on page 91. Research and development (R&D) The R&D team works in close collaboration with the sales organization and directly with customers to identify present and future customer needs. Focus areas are evolutionary upgrades and refinement of existing materials and processes, such as developing new super duplex alloys, austenitic materials, and new efficient compressor valve steels, as well as more revolutionary developments that expand the existing product portfolio. Alleima’s R&D spend amounted to SEK 292 million (255) during 2024, corresponding to approximately 1.5% (1.2) of sales. The number of employees in R&D was approximately 249 (250) by year end. Tax Alleima is a multinational group with several inter-company transactions cross borders. The OECD has issued transfer pricing guidelines for multinational groups. Alleima adheres to these guidelines and also to the local legislation of each country to ensure that a correct pricing model is applied and that a correct amount of tax is paid in each country. Alleima monitors the OECD’s tax reform work and the EU initiatives on tax transparency carefully and observes these standards as and when enacted. Alleima strives to have good relations with our stakeholders, such as tax authorities, non-governmental organizations and investors and is -convinced that an open discussion and cooperation with tax authorities around the globe will help us to reduce uncer-tainty about the taxes we are obliged to pay. However, the guidelines on transfer pricing can be interpreted in various ways. Alleima contributes to the local communities and countries in which we operate in the form of, for example, taxes and employment opportunities. In 2024, the Group paid SEK 451 million (419) in income taxes globally. Income tax comprises just a portion of all taxes paid by Alleima worldwide. In addition, Alleima pays social security contributions, environmental and energy taxes, property taxes, etc. Furthermore, Alleima collects and pays taxes at the request of governments and authorities, including indirect taxes and withholding taxes. Environment In Sweden, Alleima has operations where environmental permits are required. All operations held valid permits during the year. Guideline values in some of these permits were exceeded for emissions to air and water during the year. In all such incidents, a notification was sent to the authority. To comply with the target values, corrective actions were prompted. Alleima conduct licensed operations in accordance with environmental legislation at four locations: Sandviken, Söderfors, Hallsta-hammar and Surahammar. The permits for these sites relate to production volumes, allowed intake of water from water bodies, emission to air and water as well as waste disposal to own landfill. Two subsidiaries in Sweden are included in the EU Emissions Trading System (EU ETS). Should Alleima not execute its carbon reduction plan, an associated cost would incur. In 2024, the number of allowances allocated for the year was 55,410. Actual emissions in the trading system amounted to around 61,800 tonnes. The cost to cover the deficit amounted to approximately SEK 5.6 million. Statutory sustainability report Alleima has issued a statutory sustainability report. The report was prepared in accordance with the Annual Accounts Act and approved by the Board of Directors and the President and CEO. The statutory Sustainability Report includes pages 11, 32, 34, 36, 93-126. Parent company The parent company’s (Alleima AB) revenues amounted to SEK 27 million (24) and the operating result was SEK -50 -million (-59). As of December 31, 2024 Alleima AB’s share capital amounted to SEK 250,877,184 represen-ted by 250,877,184 shares. The largest shareholders of the parent company at -year-end were Industrivärden (20.41%) and Lundbergföretagen AB (10.04%). The ten largest shareholders amounted to 54.48% of total shares and votes. The number of employees in the parent company as of December 31, 2024 was 9 (9). Proposed appropriation of earnings To the Annual General Meeting on April 28, 2025, Alleima Board of Directors proposes for the financial year 2024 a dividend of SEK 2.30 (2.00) per share (SEK 577 million), to be paid in May 2025, and that the parent company shall retain the remaining part of non-restricted equity. The record date for entitlement to receive dividends is proposed as April 30, 2025 and payment is expected to be made on May 6, 2025. The Board of Directors proposes that earnings be distributed as follows: scroll
For further information on Shareholders’ Equity, see Group Note 19. Statement of the Board in compliance with the Swedish Companies Act (2005:551) clause 18:4 The Board has proposed that the Annual General Meeting 2025 resolve on a dividend distribution of SEK 2.30 per share. After the dividend distribution, the remaining non-restricted equity of SEK 13,160 million is proposed to be retained in the business and brought forward. The total amount of the proposed dividend distribution corresponds to approximately 4.2% of the non-restricted equity of the parent company, which in total amounts to SEK 13,737 million prior to the transaction. After the proposed dividend of SEK 577 million, an amount of SEK 13,160 million will remain. In the consolidated balance sheet per December 31, 2024, retained earnings, including the result of the year 2024, amount to SEK 16,007 million prior to the proposed dividend distribution and will amount to SEK 15,430 million after the proposed dividend distribution. The Board notes that there will be full coverage for the restricted reserves of the company after the dividend distribution. The Board makes the assessment that the company’s and the group’s equity after the dividend distribution will be able to sustain the requirements which the nature, size and risks of the business will present. The Board further considers the actions reasonable in light of the company’s and the group’s consolidation requirements, liquidity and position in general. The dividend distribution is not assumed to present any risk for the company’s or the group’s ability to fulfil its short or long term payment obligations, and neither of these measures are assumed to affect the ability of the company to make required investments. In summary, the Board considers the proposed dividend distribution to be justifiable according to the Swedish Companies Act (2005:551) chapter 17 section 3, second and third paragraph. January 24, 2025 Alleima AB (publ) The Board of Directors Divisions Alleima has three divisions: Tube, Kanthal and Strip. The largest production facilities are located in Sandviken, Sweden, and in Chomutov, Czech Republic. Tube Tube develops and manufactures seamless tubes and other long products in advanced stainless steel and special alloys, tailored for specific end applications. The customers are primarily found in the segments of Oil and Gas, Chemical and Petrochemical, Industrial, Mining and Construction, Nuclear, and Transportation. The offering also includes products and solutions for the growing segment of Hydrogen and Renewable Energy. Order intake decreased by 15% to SEK 13,677 million (16,052), with organic growth of -10%. Revenues decreased by 3% to SEK 14,027 million (14,475), with organic growth of 2%. Adjusted EBIT margin was 10.1% (10.3). EBIT margin was 7.4% (10.1) and included metal price effects of SEK -378 million (-30). scroll
1) Number of employees and Number of third-party workers is based on full-time equivalents. Strip Strip develops and manufactures a wide range of precision strip steel and compressor valve steel and also offers a portfolio of coated strip steel for components in hydrogen fuel cells. The customers are in the segments Consumer, Industrial, Transportation, Hydrogen and Renewable Energy, as well as Medical. Order intake increased by 27% to SEK 1,665 million (1,310), with organic growth of 32%. Revenues decreased by 8% to SEK 1,465 million (1,585), with organic growth of -4%. Adjusted EBIT margin was 4.5% (6.9). EBIT margin was 3.8% (6.9) and included metal price effects of SEK -9 million (0). scroll
1) Number of employees and Number of third-party workers is based on full-time equivalents. Kanthal Kanthal is a provider of products and services in the area of industrial heating technology and resistance materials, and also offers ultra-fine wire in stainless steel for use in medical appliances. The customers are primarily in the segments Industrial Heating, Consumer, Medical and Industrial. Order intake decreased by 6% to SEK 4,077 million (4,321), with organic growth of 0%. Revenues decreased by 9% to SEK 4,200 million (4,609), with organic growth of -3%. Adjusted EBIT margin was 17.9% (18.3). EBIT margin was 16.5% (16.9) and included metal price effects of SEK -59 million (-65). scroll
1) Number of employees and Number of third-party workers is based on full-time equivalents. Risks and risk managementAlleima is exposed to a number of risks that can have a negative impact on the Group’s operations. Therefore, it is of great importance that the company has a systematic and effective process to identify, manage, and reduce the effects of these risks. The purpose of Alleima’s risk work is to support the business in managing and effectively preventing risks that may affect the company’s ability to achieve its financial and strategic goals. Alleima’s board of directors decides on the Group’s strategic direction. The responsibility for the long-term and overall management of risks follows the company’s decision and delegation order. This means that the Group’s risk management generally follows the company’s decentralized structure, where the management teams of the various business operations manage their operational risks but must follow the minimum requirements defined in “The Alleima Way”, the Group’s common compilation of policies and procedures. Enterprise Risk Management The Enterprise Risk Management (ERM) process within Alleima is part of the strategy- and business--planning process. All divisions and selected Group functions perform, at least once a year, as part of the strategic work, an assessment of business risks in accordance with the ERM methodology. The Group management reviews and discusses Alleima’s risk level and decides on the Group’s risk profile at least once a year. Alleima’s overall risk profile is based on the organization’s overall risk assessment and also takes into account environmental monitoring and the Group management’s own view of risks to the business. The ERM report, which summarizes important risks and preventive activities, was presented to the Audit Committee and the Board of Directors in December 2024. The participation of the Board and the Audit Committee in the ERM process is described in more detail in the section on corporate governance. Continuity Planning and Crisis Management Alleima’s operational units, such as production units, have continuity plans in place to ensure that the organization can continue business operations at an acceptable level in the event of a disruption. In the event of a serious incident, crisis preparedness plans are in place. Insurance as a Risk Management Tool Alleima has tailored insurance programs that manage risks associated with, among other things, the Group’s property, transport, and liability exposures. Insurable risks are continuously evaluated, and measures are taken to reduce these risks. Internal Audit and Internal Control in Alleima’s Risk Work The internal audit function monitors the implementation of various risk management processes such as ERM and continuity planning at the operational units that are expected to have this in place. Financial Risks Alleima’s financial risk management is centralized, with a central finance function, Group Treasury, which manages most of the Group’s financial risks and transactions. Financial risk management is handled in accordance with the Group’s financial risk management policy, which is part of “The Alleima Way.” The financial risks managed include currency risks in the form of transaction and translation exposure, commodity price risks regarding metals and energy, interest rate risk, liquidity and refinancing risks, and credit risks. Derivatives are widely used as hedging instruments in hedging strategies and are valued at fair value. Hedge accounting is applied to all commodity-related derivatives and certain currency derivatives to avoid volatility in results from revaluations of derivatives. For a more detailed description of financial risk management and hedge accounting, see note 26. Sustainability Risks Sustainability risks are assessed as other risks within the Group at least once a year and are part of the consolidation of all organizations’ risk assessments before the Group management conducts its annual risk assessment. The most important sustainability risks are assessed in terms of both probability and impact. To further understand sustainability risks, Alleima’s materiality analysis is used to identify risks regarding sustainability and climate in the value chain. For more information on sustainability-related risks and opportunities, see the sustainability report on pages 93-126. ![]() Strategic risks → Unchanged risk assessment ↑ Increased likelihood and/or impact ↓ Reduced likelihood and/or impact scroll
Operational risks scroll
Financial risks scroll
See Note 26 for a more detailed description of financial risks. Financial information and notes Consolidated financial information Consolidated income statement Consolidated statement of comprehensive income Consolidated balance sheet Consolidated statement of cash flows Consolidated statement of changes in equity Group notes Note 1 Significant accounting principles - assessments and assumptions for accounting purposes Note 2Segment information and revenue Note 3 Personnel information and remuneration of management Note 4 Fees and remuneration to auditors Note 5 Research, development and quality -assurance Note 6 Other operating income Note 7 Other operating expenses Note 8 Operating expenses Note 9 Net financial items Note 10 Income tax Note 11 Earnings per share Note 12 Intangible assets Note 13 Property, plant and equipment Note 14 Leases Note 15 Non-current financial assets Note 16 Inventories Note 17 Trade receivables Note 18 Other current receivables Note 19 Equity Note 20 Provision for pensions and other non-current benefits Note 21 Other interest-bearing liabilities Note 22 Other provisions Note 23 Other non-interest-bearing liabilities Note 24 Accrued expenses Note 25 Contingent liabilities and pledged assets Note 26 Financial risk management Note 27 Related parties Note 28 Business combinations Note 29 Government grants Note 30 Events after the close of the period Parent company financial information Parent company income statement Parent company statement of comprehensive income Parent company balance sheet Parent company cash flow statement Parent company changes in equity Parent company notes Note 1 Significant accounting principles - assessments and assumptions for accounting purposes Note 2 Revenue Note 3 Interest revenue and similar income Note 4 Income tax Note 5 Shares in group companies Note 6 Receivables from group companies Note 7 Contingent liabilities and other commitments Note 8 Employees Note 9 Fees and remuneration to auditors Consolidated financial informationConsolidated income statementscroll
Consolidated statement of comprehensive incomescroll
Consolidated balance sheetscroll
Consolidated statement of cash flowsscroll
Consolidated statement of changes in equityscroll
scroll
Note 1 | Significant accounting -principles - assessments and assumptions for accounting purposesThe consolidated financial statements comprise Alleima AB, corporate registration number 559224-1433 (the Parent Company) and all its subsidiaries, jointly the Alleima Group with registered office in Sandviken, Sweden. The address to the head office is SE-811 81 Sandviken. The Parent Company’s functional currency is Swedish kronor (SEK), which is also the presentation currency of the Parent Company and the Alleima Group. Accordingly, the financial statements are presented in SEK. All amounts are in million SEK unless otherwise stated. Roundings may occur. The Parent Company’s Annual Report and the consolidated financial statements were approved for issuance by the Board of Directors on March 12, 2025. The Group’s and the Parent Company’s income statements and balance sheets are subject to adoption at the Annual General Meeting on April 28, 2025. Accounting principles Basis for preparation The consolidated financial statements for the year 2024 covering the period from January 1 to December 31, 2024, have been prepared in accordance with International Financial Reporting Standards (IFRS) as endorsed by the EU. The statements are also prepared in accordance with the Swedish recommendation RFR 1 “Supplementary Accounting Rules for Groups” and applicable statements issued by the Swedish Financial Reporting Board. These require certain additional disclosure requirements for Swedish consolidated financial statements prepared in accordance with IFRS. Basis of measurement Assets and liabilities are stated on a historical cost basis except for certain financial assets and liabilities, which are stated at their fair value. Financial assets and liabilities measured at fair value comprise of derivative instruments and plan assets in the defined benefit plans. Receivables and liabilities and items of income and expense are offset only when required or expressly permitted in an accounting standard. The preparation of financial statements in conformity with IFRS requires management to make assessments, estimates and assumptions that affect the application of accounting policies and recognized amounts of assets and liabilities, income and expenses. Actual results may differ from these assessments. The estimates and underlying assumptions are reviewed on an ongoing basis. Revisions to accounting estimates are recognized in the period in which the estimate is revised if the revision affects only that period or in the period of the revision and future periods if the revision affects both current and future periods. Judgments made by management in the application of IFRS that have had a significant effect on the financial statements and estimates with a significant risk of material adjustment in the next year, are discussed further below. Events after the balance sheet date refer to both favorable and unfavorable events that have occurred after the balance sheet date but before the date the financial statements were authorized for issue by the Board of Directors. Significant non-adjusting events, that is, events indicative of conditions that arose after the balance sheet date, are disclosed in the financial statements. Only adjusting events, that is, those that provide evidence of conditions that existed at the balance sheet date, have been considered in the final establishment of the financial statements. The most significant accounting policies for the Group, as set out below and in the notes, have been applied consistently to all periods presented in these consolidated financial statements except as specifically described. Moreover, the Group’s accounting policies have been consistently applied in the Group reporting by all members of the Group. Basis of consolidation The combined accounts are prepared in accordance with the Group’s accounting principles and include the accounts of the Parent Company and all entities in which the Parent Company, directly or indirectly has control. Control exists when the Parent Company has power over the entity, is exposed, or has rights, to variable returns from its involvement with the entity and has the ability to use its power to affect its returns. Generally, control and hence consolidation is based on ownership. Group companies are consolidated from the date the Parent Company exercises control or influence over the Company. Divested companies are included in the consolidated accounts until the date the Parent Company ceases to control or exercise influence over them. In preparing Alleima’s combined financial statements, any intra-group transactions have been eliminated. For cases in which the subsidiary’s accounting policies do not coincide with the Group’s accounting policies, adjustments were made to comply with the Group’s accounting policies. The consolidated financial statements are prepared in accordance with the acquisition method. In business combinations, acquired assets and assumed liabilities are identified and classified, and measured at fair value on the date of acquisition (also known as a purchase price allocation). Transaction costs in conjunction with acquisitions are recognized directly in profit or loss for the year as other operating expenses. Contingent considerations are recognized as financial liabilities and at fair value on the acquisition date. Contingent considerations are remeasured at each reporting period with any change recognized in profit or loss for the year. Foreign currency Foreign currency transactions Transactions in foreign currencies are translated into functional currency at the foreign exchange rate prevailing at the date of the transaction. The functional currency is the currency of the primary economic environment in which the Group entities operate. Monetary assets and liabilities denominated in foreign currencies at the balance sheet date are translated to the functional currency at the foreign exchange rate prevailing at that date. Foreign exchange differences arising on translation are recognized in profit or loss for the year. Non-monetary assets and liabilities measured in terms of historical cost in a foreign currency are translated using the exchange rate prevailing at the date of the transaction. Non-monetary assets and liabilities that are measured at fair value are re-translated to the functional currency at the exchange rate prevailing at the date that the fair value was determined. Financial statements of foreign operations The assets and liabilities of foreign operations, including goodwill and fair value adjustments arising on consolidation, are translated from the foreign operation’s functional currency to the Group’s presentation currency, SEK, at foreign exchange rates prevailing at the balance sheet date. Revenues and expenses of foreign operations are translated to SEK at average rates that approximate the foreign exchange rates prevailing at each of the transaction dates. Translation differences arising from the translation of the net investment in foreign operations are recognized in other comprehensive income and are accumulated in a separate component of equity, a translation reserve. When the foreign operation is divested, the accumulated translation differences attributable to the divested foreign operation are reclassified from equity to profit or loss for the year as a reclassification adjustment at the date on which the profit or loss of the divestment is recognized. For cases in which divestments made include a residual controlling influence, the proportionate share of accumulated translation differences from other comprehensive income is transferred to non-controlling interests. Changes in accounting policies IASB has published amendments of standards that are effective as of January 1, 2024 or later. The standards have not had any material impact on the financial reports. IASB has published IFRS 18 Presentation and Disclosure in Financial Statements with an implementation date of January 1, 2027. The standard has not yet been approved by the EU. IFRS 18 will replace IAS 1 Presentation of Financial Statements. IFRS 18 primarily concerns three key areas for presentation and disclosures in the financial statements, with a focus on the income statement and reporting of financial performance. The company has not completed its evaluation of the effects of IFRS 18. Adjustment of hedge accounting During 2024 a correction of some hedge accounting transactions related to 2022 was made, which resulted in a restatement of the closing balance for equity as of December 31, 2022 between the hedge reserve and retained earnings of SEK -277 million. The adjustment had no effect on total equity. Retained earnings post the adjustment amounts to SEK 15,276 million as of December 31, 2023. Reporting of operating segments Alleima’s management monitors its operations from an operating segment perspective. In accordance with IFRS 8 Operating segments, Alleima’s management has identified the three divisions Tube, Kanthal and Strip as the reportable segments. Alleima’s business is organized in a manner that allows the Group’s Chief Operating Decision Maker (CODM), meaning the CEO, to monitor results, return and cash flow generated by the various products and services in the Group. Each operating segment has a Division Head (the Strip-division has one division head and one head for the business unit Surface Technology) that is responsible for day-to-day activities and who regularly reports to the CEO regarding the results of the operating segment’s work and the need for resources. Since the CEO monitors the business’ result and decides on the distribution of resources based on the products the Group manufactures and sells and the services it provides, these constitute the Group’s operating segments. The Group’s operations are organized in Divisions based on products and services. The market organization also reflects this structure. The same accounting principles are applied for the segments and the Group. Segment results, assets and liabilities include only those items that are directly attributable to the segment and the relevant portions of items that can be allocated on a reasonable basis to the segments. Unallocated items comprise interest, gains on disposal of financial investments, interest expense, losses on the disposal of financial investments, income tax expense and certain administrative expenses. Unallocated assets and liabilities include income and deferred tax receivables and payables, financial investments and financial liabilities. Revenue from goods and services Revenue is recognized when the control of goods and services is transferred to the customer at an amount reflecting the expected and entitled consideration for the goods or services provided. The supply of goods and services comprises, advanced stainless steels and special alloys as well as products for industrial heating and medical technology. Allocation of transaction price The transaction price is allocated to each identified performance obligation on a relative stand-alone selling price basis. This means that each performance obligation will be allocated its share of revenue based on its stand-alone selling price put in relation to the sum of all performance obligation’s stand-alone selling price. Adjusted market assessment approach and expected cost plus a margin approach are normally used to determine the stand-alone selling price if no observable selling price is available for one or more of the performance obligations. Variable consideration is generally allocated proportionally to all performance obligations unless there is evidence that the entire variable consideration is related to a specific performance obligation in the contract. Variable consideration Customer contracts can include variable considerations such as cash discounts and rebates. When such components are identified, an assessment is made to determine if the identified portion of revenue and any related cost of goods sold should be deferred to a later period. This is established by applying the expected value method or the most likely amount method with the threshold of being highly probable that a reversal of revenue will not occur. Significant financing component When advances are received, Alleima adjusts the promised amount of consideration for the effects of the time value of money. Alleima uses the practical expedient to not calculate and account for significant financing component if the period between the transfer of a good or service to a customer and payment is 12 months or less. Cost to obtain a contract Incremental costs to obtain a customer contract shall be recognized as a contract asset if the cost is incremental and Alleima expects to recover the costs. The contract asset is periodized over the contract lifetime. Contract asset for costs to obtain a contract is not recognized if the contract has a duration equal to or shorter than 12 months. Examples of incremental costs are agent fees, commission to sales employees, signing fees etc. Goods sold Revenue from goods sold (e.g. high value-added products in advance stainless steels and special alloys and products for industrial heating) is recognized at a point in time when the control has been transferred to the customer. To assess when the control has been transferred, indicators such as, but not limited to, significant risks and rewards of ownership, transferred physical possession, the customer has accepted the asset, present right to payment and legal title of goods and services are considered. For sale of goods the transfer of control usually occurs when the significant risks and rewards are transferred in accordance with the Incoterms. When goods sold are highly customized and there is an enforceable right to payment for performances completed to date, the goods are recognized over time. Progress of satisfaction of each performance obligation is used to measure the revenue by the proportion of cost incurred to date compared to estimated total cost of each performance obligation. If a customer contract includes a buy-back clause, exercised at the customer discretion and a significant transfer of control has not taken place, the transaction is then accounted for as an operational lease in accordance with IFRS 16 Leases. If the customer is not considered to have a significant economic incentive to exercise the option, the contract is then accounted for by applying the principles of variable consideration. Payment is generally due between 30-90 days from the transfer of control. In some contracts, short-term advances are required before the product is delivered. Some contracts contain late delivery penalties and volume rebates, which give rise to variable consideration subject to constraint. Operating expenses Operating expenses are classified according to function, as described below. Depreciation and amortization and personnel costs are stated by function. Cost of goods sold Cost of goods sold is defined as the costs of production and procurement of the goods sold and other order specific costs. The cost of goods sold also includes inventory write-down and valuation items, the part of the cost for personnel, premises, purchased services and depreciation and amortization of non-current assets, including right-of-use assets, attributable to the production of sold goods. Selling expenses Selling expenses include costs for the internal sales organization, purchased services, personnel costs, cost for right-of-use assets, bad debt losses, IT costs of sales systems and logistics systems as well as depreciation and amortization of non-current assets attributable to sales activities. Advertising and other marketing activities are also included and are expensed as incurred. Administrative expenses Administrative expenses consist of the part of the personnel costs, purchased services as well as depreciation and amortization of non-current assets, including right-of-use assets, attributable to the other joint functions. Costs associated with the Board of Directors, executive management and corporate functions are included in administrative expenses. Other operating income and other operating expenses Other operating income and other operating expenses include secondary activities, exchange rate differences in operating activities and gain/loss on the sale of tangible and intangible assets. Financial income and expenses Financial expenses consist of interest expense on borrowings. Unrealized gains and losses on hedging instruments are recognized in profit or loss for the year. Income tax Income tax comprises current and deferred tax. Income tax is recognized in profit or loss for the year except when the underlying transaction is recognized in other comprehensive income. In these cases, the associated tax effects are recognized in other comprehensive income. Current tax is the expected tax payable on the taxable income for the year, using tax rates enacted at the balance sheet date, and any adjustment to tax payable in respect to previous years. Current tax liabilities are offset against current tax receivables and deferred tax assets are offset against deferred tax liabilities when the entity has a legal right to offset these items and intends to do so. Deferred tax is recognized based on temporary differences between the carrying amounts of assets and liabilities for financial reporting purposes and their value for tax purposes. Deferred taxes are measured at their nominal amount and based on the expected manner of realization or settlement of the carrying amount of the underlying assets and liabilities, using tax rates and fiscal regulations enacted or substantively enacted at the balance sheet date. Deferred tax assets relating to deductible temporary differences and tax losses carried forward are recognized only to the extent that it is probable they can be utilized against future taxable profits. Government grants Government grants are recognized as deferred income in the balance sheet when there is reasonable assurance that the grant will be received, and that the entity will comply with the conditions attached to them. Grants are recognized in profit or loss for the year in the same way and over the same periods as the related costs that they are intended to compensate, on a systematic basis. Grants related to assets are presented by deducting the grant from the carrying amount of the asset. Intangible assets Goodwill Goodwill acquired in a business combination repre-sents the excess of the cost of the business combination over the net fair value of the identifiable assets, liabilities and contingent liabilities recognized. Goodwill is measured at cost less any accumulated impairment losses and is reported as an indefinite useful life intangible asset. Goodwill is allocated to cash generating units that are expected to benefit from the synergies of the business combination and is tested for impairment yearly, or when there is an indication of impairment. Impairment losses on goodwill are not reversed. Research and development Expenditure on research activities related to the obtaining of new scientific or technical knowledge is expensed as incurred. Expenditure on development activities, whereby the research results or other knowledge is applied to accomplish new or improved products or processes, is recognized as an intangible asset in the balance sheet, provided the product or process is technically and commercially feasible and the Company has sufficient resources to complete development, and is subsequently able to use or sell the intangible asset. The carrying amount includes the directly attributable expenditure, such as the cost of materials and services, costs of employee benefits, fees to register intellectual property rights and amortization of patents and licenses. Other expenses for development are expensed as incurred. In the balance sheet, capitalized development expenditure is stated at cost less accumulated amortization and any impairment losses. Emission rights Emission rights are recognized at cost less any accumulated impairment. The cost for the rights received free of charge is zero. A provision is made if a deficit of emission rights has been identified between the rights owned and the rights to be delivered due to actual emissions. The provision is valued at the market value of the rights required to cover the excess consumption of emissions made. Gains or losses on the disposal of emission rights are recognized in the income statement. Other intangible assets Other intangible assets acquired by the Company are recognized at cost less accumulated amortization and any impairment losses. Capitalized expenditure for the development and purchase of software for the Group’s IT operations are included here. Intangible assets also include patents, trademarks, licenses, customer relationships and other rights. They are split between acquired and internally generated intangible assets. Amortization of intangible assets Amortization is charged to profit or loss for the year on a straight-line basis over the estimated useful lives of intangible assets unless such lives are indefinite. Intangible assets with an indefinite useful life, consisting of goodwill, are systematically tested for impairment annually or as soon as there is an indication that the asset may be impaired. Intangible assets with a finite useful life are amortized as of the date the asset is available for use. The estimated useful lives are as follows: scroll
Impairment and reversals of impairment Assets with an indefinite useful life are not amortized but tested annually for impairment. Assets that are amortized or depreciated are tested for impairment whenever events or changed circumstances indicate that the carrying amount may not be recoverable. An impairment loss is recognized in the amount by which the carrying amount of an asset exceeds its recoverable amount, which is the greater of the fair value less cost of disposal and value in use. In assessing value in use, the estimated future cash flows are discounted to their present value using a rate that reflects current market assessments of the time value of money and the risks specific to the asset. For an asset that does not generate largely independent cash inflows, the recoverable amount is determined for the cash generating units to which the asset belongs. Goodwill is tested at the level of operating segments. An impairment loss is reversed if there has been a change in the estimates used to determine the recoverable amount. An impairment loss is reversed only to the extent that the asset’s carrying amount does not exceed the carrying amount that would have been determined, net of depreciation and amortization, if no impairment loss had been recognized. Impairment of goodwill is not reversed. Property, plant and equipment Owned assets Property, plant and equipment are recognized at cost less accumulated depreciation and any impairment losses. Depreciation of property, plant and equipment Property, plant and equipment are depreciated over their estimated useful lives. Land is not depreciated. Depreciation is recognized on a straight-line basis (unless otherwise described) based on the cost of the assets, adjusted by residual value when applicable, and estimated useful lives. The following depreciation periods are applied. scroll
scroll
scroll
If an item of property, plant and equipment comprises components with different useful lives, each such significant component is depreciated separately. Depreciation methods and estimated residual values and useful lives are reviewed at each year-end. Impairment and reversals of impairment Impairment and reversals of impairment is applicable also for property, plant and equipment. For details see Intangible assets. Borrowing costs Borrowing costs attributable to the construction of qualifying assets are capitalized as a portion of the qualifying asset’s cost. A qualifying asset is an asset that takes a substantial time period to get ready for its intended use or sale and to a substantial amount. The Group considers a period in excess of one year to be a substantial time period. Leases In the consolidated financial statements, leases when Alleima being a lessee are recognized as right-of-use assets and when being a lessor either as a finance lease or an operational lease. Impairment and reversals of impairment Impairment and reversals of impairment is applicable also for right-of-use assets. For details see Intangible assets. Alleima as a lessee For all contracts an evaluation is done to identify if a lease exists by testing if Alleima has the right to obtain substantially all the economic benefits from use of the identified assets and has the right to direct the use of the identified asset and that the supplier has no substantial rights of substitution. Alleima has decided to separate non-lease components from the lease components in contracts concern-ing buildings. The non-lease component cost should then be recognized as an expense and not be included in the calculation of a right-of-use asset and lease liability for asset class buildings. For all other asset classes non-lease components are included in the calculation of a right-of-use asset and lease liability. The lease contracts are assessed at the commence-ment date whether the lessee is reasonably certain to exercise an option to extend the lease; or to exercise an option to purchase the underlying asset; or not to exercise an option to terminate the lease. In cases of open-ended contracts local law can provide protection to the lessee from being given notice. This requires the Alleima lessee to determine the contract period instead of considering the termination clause. The lessee then determines the length of the contract period based on factors such as the importance of building to the business, any planned or made leasehold investments and the market situation for premises. The lease liability and right-of-use asset is calculated by using the implicit rate in the contract. If the implicit rate cannot be identified the incremental borrowing rate is instead applied, which is the interest rate the Company had been given if the investment had been financed through a loan from a financial institute. The measurement of the right-of-use asset includes amount of initial measurement of lease liability, lease payments at or before the commencement date, any initial direct cost and restoration costs. Alleima depreciates the right-of-use asset from the commencement date to the earlier of the end of the useful life of the right-of-use asset or the end of the lease term. After commencement date the carrying amount of the lease liability and the right-of-use asset is remeasured to reflect any modification or reassessment of a lease contract. Alleima has chosen to apply the two expedients concerning leases shorter than one year (defined as leases with a lease term of 12 months or less at commencement date) and low value assets (with a value as new below USD 5,000) which are expensed on a current basis. Alleima as a lessor As a lessor, Alleima has classified its leases as operating leases. An operating lease is a lease that does not transfer substantially all the risks and rewards as a result from ownership of an underlying asset. A sublease should also be classified as finance or operational lease by reference to the right-of-use asset arising from the head lease, rather than by reference to the underlying asset, for example, an item of property, plant or equipment. When the agreement is recognized as an operating lease the asset is classified as tangible assets and valued at cost less accumulated depreciation. The cost of an asset comprises the acquisition value and any initial direct costs related to the contract. The lease payments and the depreciations are included in profit or loss on a straight-line basis over the term of the lease. Inventories Inventories are stated at the lowest of cost and net realizable value, with due consideration of obsolescence. Net realizable value is the estimated selling price in the ordinary course of business, less the estimated costs of completion and selling expenses. Cost is based on the first-in/first-out (FIFO) principle and includes expenditure incurred in acquiring the inventories and bringing them to their existing location and condition. In the case of manufactured inventories and work in progress, cost includes an appropriate share of overheads based on normal operating capacity. Financial instruments Financial instruments recognized in the balance sheet include assets, such as account receivables, financial investments, cash and cash equivalents and derivatives, and liabilities such as loan liabilities, account payables, and derivatives. Cash and cash equivalents consist of cash and bank balances as well as current investments with maturities up to and including 3 months. Recognition and derecognition A financial asset or a financial liability is recognized on the balance sheet when the entity becomes a party to the contractual provisions of the instrument. Account receivables are recognized upon issuance of the invoice. A liability is recognized when the counterparty has performed under the agreement and the Company is contractually obliged to settle the obligation, even if no invoice has been received. At initial recognition, the Group measures financial assets and liabilities at its fair value plus or minus, in the case of a financial asset or liability not at fair value through profit or loss (FVPL), transaction costs including all fees, premiums and discounts that are directly attributable to the acquisition or issue of the financial asset and liability. Transaction costs of financial assets and liabilities carried at FVPL are expensed in the income statement. A financial asset is derecognized when the rights to receive cash flows under the agreement have expired or have been transferred and the group has substantially transferred all the risks and rewards. A financial liability is derecognized when the obligation specified in the contract is discharged or otherwise expires. A financial asset and a financial liability are offset and presented in a net amount in the balance sheet only if there is a legally enforceable right to offset the recognized amounts and there is an intention either to settle on a net basis or to realize the asset and settle the liability simultaneously. Classification and measurement Financial assets, excluding derivatives, including equity- and debt instruments The Group classifies its financial assets as those to be measured at fair value, and those to be measured at amortized cost. For debt instruments, which includes accounts receivables, the classification depends on the Group’s business model for managing the financial assets and the contractual terms of the cash flows: Amortized Cost: Assets that are held for collection of contractual cash flows, where those cash flows represent solely payments of principal and interest, are measured at amortized cost. Interest income from these financial assets is included in financial income using the effective interest rate method. Any gain or loss arising on derecognition is recognized directly in the income statement. Fair Value through profit and loss: Assets that do not meet the criteria for amortized cost are measured as fair value through profit and loss. Financial liabilities Financial liabilities excluding derivatives are classified and subsequently measured at amortized cost. Any difference between the loan amount, net of transaction costs, and the repayable amount is allocated to profit or loss for the year over the term of the loan using the effective interest method. For information on contractual terms, scheduled repayments and the exposure to interest risk and foreign-currency risk, refer to Note 26 Financial risk management. Financial instruments measured at fair value in the balance sheet Fair value is the price that would be received to sell an asset or paid to transfer a liability in an orderly transaction between market participants at the measurement date. Under the IFRS 13 Fair Value Measurement disclosure requirements, the method applied to the valuation of assets and liabilities measured at fair value in the balance sheet is presented below. The valuation is divided into three levels:
Measurements of fair value The fair value of foreign exchange contracts, raw materials- and electricity- and gas derivatives are determined based on observable market prices. For means of payment, receivables and payables with variable interest and current receivables and payables (for example, trade receivables and accounts payable), the fair value has been considered to correspond to the carrying amount. Hedge accounting Hedge accounting is applied in accordance with IFRS 9 and to meet the criteria there must be a clear relationship between the hedging instrument and the hedged item. The relationship is expected to be highly effective, and it must be possible to reliably measure such effectiveness. Moreover, the hedge must be formally designated and documented. Gains and losses on remeasurement of derivatives used for hedging purposes are recognized as described below under cash flow hedges. Cash flow hedges Hedge accounting is applied when hedging a partic-ular risk associated with highly probable future cash flows and forecast transactions. Alleima applies hedge accounting for derivatives that are used to hedge the Group’s exposure to electricity-, gas- and metal price risk. In addition, hedge accounting is applied for some derivatives that are used to hedge the exchange rate exposure in orders and investments. Changes in the fair value of the derivatives designated for hedge accounting are recognized in Other comprehensive income and accumulated in the Hedge reserve within equity. Changes in fair value are subsequently reclassified to profit or loss in the same period as the Group reports the expense of the hedged consumption of electricity, gas and metal or included in the carrying amount of the purchased metals or acquired property, plant and equipment as appropriate. Any ineffectiveness is recognized immediately in profit or loss. Derivatives, for which hedge accounting is not applied, are measured at their fair value directly through profit or loss. Current receivables Trade receivables Trade receivables are recognized at amortized cost. Alleima evaluates its trade receivables, contract assets and financial leases on a collective basis for each category, respectively. Each reporting entity classifies their receivables in suitable risk categories according to Group policy based on expected credit losses. Expected credit loss provisions are based on the full lifetime expected credit loss model with a provision matrix where fixed provision rates are applied depen-ding on the number of days outstanding. The entities consider reasonable and supportable information about past events, current conditions and reasonable and supportable forecasts of future economic conditions when measuring the expected credit losses. Credit risks are classified based on credit information provided by credit agencies, identified payment behavior of the customer and other relevant information available, such as lost contracts, changes in company management and other customer specific information. Additionally, a macroeconomic evaluation is conducted on the outlook of industries and countries relevant for Alleima’s customers if needed. Changes to the allowance for expected credit losses for accounts receivables are recognized in selling expenses. Alleima’s principles for the writing off receivables are based on several prerequisites, such as proof of write-off, insolvency or failed legal and other collection processes. An assessment is made whether one or several of these prerequisites are fulfilled before the write-off takes place. The Group selectively utilizes different forms of credit securities, such as letters of credit, retention of title or credit insurance. Alleima sells certain trade receivables for larger volume and credit worthy customers without recourse. The receivable is derecognized when substantially all risks and rewards of ownership of the financial asset has been transferred. Contract assets A contract asset is recognized when the right to consideration for a performance obligation is conditional on completion of promises other than the passage of time. Equity Equity is defined as total shareholders’ equity including non-controlling interests. The translation reserve comprises all foreign exchange differences arising on the translation of the financial statements of foreign operations stated in a currency different from the Group’s presentation currency. Dividends are recognized as a liability in the period in which they are resolved at a shareholders’ meeting. Retained earnings including profit or loss for the year comprises the earned profit of the parent company and its subsidiaries. Equity swap raised to secure the delivery of shares under the incentive program is reported in equity with adjustment for related expenses and any dividends on the shares. Non-controlling interests are recognized as a separate item in the Group’s equity. Acquisitions of non-controlling interests are recognized as a transaction within shareholders’ equity, meaning between the parent company’s owners and non-controlling interests. Accordingly, goodwill does not arise in conjunction with such transactions. Gains or losses on disposals to non-controlling interests are also recognized in equity. Pensions Defined-contribution plans A defined-contribution plan is a post-employment benefit plan under which an entity pays fixed contributions into a separate entity and will have no legal or constructive obligation to pay further amounts. The size of the pension that the employee will ultimately receive in such cases depends on the size of the contributions that the entity pays to the plan or an insurance company and the return that the contributions yield. Obligations for contributions to defined-contribution pension plans are recognized as an employee benefit expense in profit or loss for the year as the employee renders services to the entity. Defined-benefit plans The Group’s net obligation in respect to defined-benefit pension plans is calculated separately for each plan by estimating the amount of future benefit that employees have vested in return for their service in the current and prior periods. This benefit is discounted to its present value. The discount rate is the yield on high-quality corporate bonds, mortgage bonds - or if there is no deep market for such bonds, government bonds - that have maturity dates approximating the terms of the Group’s obligations. The calculation is performed annually by a qualified actuary. In addition, the fair value of any plan assets is assessed. This method of accounting is applied to the most significant defined-benefit plans in the Group. A few plans, which neither individually nor in the aggregate are significant in relation to the Group’s total pension obligations, are still recognized in accordance with local regulations. In measuring the present value of pension obligations and the fair value of plan assets, actuarial gains and losses may accrue either because the actual outcome differs from earlier assumptions (so-called experience adjustments) or the assumptions are changed. These actuarial gains and losses are recognized in the balance sheet and in other comprehensive income. When the benefits under a plan are improved, the portion of the increased benefits that relate to past service by employees is recognized in profit or loss for the year. The amount of obligations recognized in the balance sheet for pensions and similar obligations reflects the present value of the obligations at the balance sheet date, less the fair value of any plan assets. Other provisions A provision is recognized in the balance sheet when the Group has a legal or constructive obligation as a result of a past event, and it is probable that an outflow of resources will be required to settle the obligation, and a reliable estimate of the amount can be made. If the effect is material, the provision is determined by discounting the expected future cash flows at a pre-tax rate that reflects the current market assessments of the time value of money and, where appropriate, the risks specific to the liability. The provisions are mainly related to termination benefits, warranty commitments, restructuring, long-term incentives, environmental obligations and legal disputes and claims, such as value-added tax issues, and customer and supplier claims relating to ongoing or finished projects. Termination benefits When employment is terminated, a provision is recognized only when the entity is demonstrably committed either to terminate the employment of an employee or a group of employees before the normal retirement age or provide termination benefits as a result of an offer made to encourage voluntary redundancy. In the latter case, a liability and an expense are recognized if it is probable that the offer will be accepted and the number of employees that will accept the offer can be reliably estimated. Warranty commitments A provision for warranties is recognized when the underlying products or services are sold. The provision is based on historical warranty data and a weighing of all possible outcomes against their associated probabilities. Restructuring A provision for restructuring is recognized when the Group has approved a detailed and formal restructuring plan and the restructuring has either commenced or has been announced publicly. Future operating costs are not provided for. Employee benefits A provision for personnel-related benefits is recognized in accordance with agreements entered for long-term incentive programs, local bonus programs, part-time pensions, and other personnel obligations. Environmental obligations Environmental provision is recognized when there is a legal obligation or a decided defined action, such remediation or testing programs. Every year a provision is recognized for waste material and slag deposits. Monitoring programs in continuous operations are regarded as cost as they occur. Site restoration Provision for costs for restoring contaminated land is made in accordance with when there is a legal requirement or other binding commitment to restore established contaminated land and when the cost can be measured with reasonable precision. Site restoration is included in environmental obligations. Legal disputes Legal disputes include provisions for claims which, at the balance sheet date, had not been closed. Other obligations Other obligations include provisions for onerous contracts. Provisions classified as current are expected to result in an outflow of resources within twelve months from the balance sheet date. Share-based payments The costs for equity-settled payments are based on the fair value of the share rights calculated by an independent party at the date of grant. These payments are reported as employee costs during the vesting period with a corresponding increase in equity. The vesting conditions in the program are linked to non-market performance conditions (earnings per share and reduction of carbon dioxide) and service conditions (employment period) which are taken into account in employee cost during the vesting period by the change in the number of shares that are expected to finally vest. Alleima records a liability for social security expenses, at each reporting period, for all outstanding share-based payments. Social security expenses attributable to equity-based instruments to employees as compensation for provided services are expensed in the periods during which the services are performed. The provision for social security expenses is based on the fair value of the share rights at each reporting period. Other liabilities Other liabilities excluding derivatives are classified and subsequently measured at amortized cost. Contract liabilities are recognized when a payment is received before the performance obligation has been satisfied. Alleima is party of supply chain financing arrangements, also known as reversed factoring. Those liabilities are part of the working capital used in Alleima’s normal operating cycle, and represents a liability to pay for received goods or services, which were invoiced or formally agreed with the supplier. Thus, these liabilities are presented as part of Accounts payable in the balance sheet. Contingent liabilities A contingent liability is recognized when there is a possible obligation that arises from past events and whose existence will be confirmed only by the occurrence or non-occurrence of one or more uncertain future events. A contingent liability is also recognized when there is a present obligation that cannot be recognized as a liability because it is not probable that an outflow of resources will be required, alternatively because the amount of the obligation cannot be measured with sufficient reliability. Cash flow statement The consolidated cash flow statement is prepared in accordance with the indirect method. A short-term investment is classified as a cash and cash equivalent if:
Critical estimates and key judgments In order to prepare the financial statements, management and the Board make various judgments and estimates, including impact from climate change, that can affect the amounts recognized in the financial statements for assets, liabilities, revenues and expenses as well as information in general, including contingent liabilities. The judgments and estimates discussed below are those deemed to be most important for an understanding of the financial statements, considering the level of significant estimations and uncertainty. The conditions under which Alleima operates are gradually changing meaning that the judgments also change. Business combinations The Group uses estimates and judgments regarding allocation of goodwill and other surplus values in a business combination, see Note 12 Intangible assets and Note 28 Business combinations. Income tax Estimates are made to determine both current and deferred tax liabilities/assets, not least the value of deferred tax assets. The actual results may differ from these estimates, for instance due to changes in the business climate, changed tax legislation, or the outcome of the final review by tax authorities and tax courts of tax returns, see Note 10 Income tax. Valuation of inventory The Group use estimates to determine inventory reserves. When calculating inventory reserves, Alleima considers production and sales volumes, as well as the demand for certain products, see Note 16 Inventories. Impairment of non-current assets Impairment tests of goodwill Goodwill is tested for impairment annually and whenever events or changes in circumstances indicate that the carrying amount of goodwill has been impaired, for example due to a changed business climate or a decision taken either to sell or close down certain operations. In order to determine if the value of goodwill has been impaired, the cash generating unit or group of cash generating units to which goodwill has been allocated must be valued using present value techniques. When applying this valuation technique, Alleima relies on a number of factors, including historical results, business plans, forecasts and market data. As can be deduced from this description, changes in the conditions for these judgments and estimates can significantly affect the assessed value of goodwill, see Note 12 Intangible assets. Impairment tests of other non-current assets Alleima’s intangible and tangible assets, excluding goodwill, are stated at cost less accumulated amortization and depreciation and any impairment losses. Other than goodwill, Alleima has not identified any intangible or tangible assets with indefinite useful lives. The assets are amortized over their estimated useful lives to their estimated residual values. Both the estimated useful life and the residual value are reviewed at least at each financial year-end, see Note 12 Intangible assets and Note 13 Property, plant and equipment. The carrying amount of the Group’s non-current assets is tested for impairment whenever events or changes in circumstances indicate that the carrying amount will not be recovered. The carrying amount of intangible and tangible assets not yet available for use is tested annually. If such analysis indicates an excessive carrying amount, the recoverable amount of the asset is estimated. The recoverable amount is the higher of the asset’s fair value less costs of disposal, and its value in use. Value in use is measured as the discounted future cash flows of the asset, alternatively the cash generating unit to which the asset belongs. A call for an impairment test also arises when a non-current asset is classified as being held for sale, at which time it must be remeasured at the lower of its carrying amount and fair value less costs of disposal. Post-employment benefits Actuarial assumptions are used to measure pension obligations and they significantly affect the recognized net liability and the annual pension cost. One critical assumption - the discount rate - is essential for the measurement of both the interest expense of the year and the present value of the defined-benefit obligations’ current year. The discount rate is used both for calculating the present value of the obligation and as an estimate for the return on plan assets. The discount rate is reviewed quarterly, which affects the net liability, and annually, which also affects the expense for the coming year. All other assumptions, both financial and demographic are reviewed at least annually, see Note 20 Provision for pensions and other non-current post-employment benefits. The financial risk management associated with the defined benefit plans are presented in Note 26 Financial risk management. Environmental obligations The nature and long history of the operations of the Alleima Group typically entail a risk of claims in relation to contaminations, since the environmental requirements on operations were generally less stringent in the past. Claims to investigate or to carry out remedial measures may arise following inquiries from authorities, in connection with property transfers, property development or review of permits. Environmental provision is updated at least annually and whenever events or changes in conditions indicate a need of review, e.g. requirements from authorities or decision to sell or close down certain operations. The ongoing provision for waste material and slag is based on estimated cost and time before final coverage of the landfill. Environmental obligation is presented in Note 22 Other Provisions. Note 2 | Segment information and revenueAlleima’s management monitors its operations from an operating segment perspective. In accordance with IFRS 8, Operating segments, Alleima’s management has identified the three divisions Tube, Kanthal and Strip as the reportable segments. Alleima monitors and evaluates the segments on adjusted operating profit (Adjusted EBIT), see Alternative Performance Measures presented in page 130. Further information see Reporting of operating segments in Note 1. Division Tube develops and manufactures seamless tubes and other long products in advanced stainless steels and special alloys. Division Kanthal is a provider of products and services in the area of industrial heating technology and resistance materials, and also offers ultra-fine wire in stainless steel for use in medical appliances. Division Strip develops and manufactures a wide range of precision strip steel products and also offers pre-coated strip steel for components in the hydrogen fuel cell stack. 2.1 Information on business segments/divisions scroll
scroll
2.1 Information on business segments/divisions scroll
scroll
All transactions between the divisions are on market terms. For information regarding business combinations, see Note 28. 2.2 Revenue and Non-current assets by country and contract liabilities scroll
scroll
Non-current assets consists of -intangible assets, property, plant and equipment and right-of-use assets. Non-current assets are specified by country based where the assets are located. scroll
2.3 Revenue per customer segment scroll
scroll
scroll
scroll
Note 3 | Personnel information and remuneration of management3.1 Average number of employees scroll
3.2 Wages, salaries, other remuneration and social costs scroll
3.3 Wages, salaries, other remuneration by market area scroll
3.4 Gender distribution in senior management scroll
3.5 Remuneration to executive management Remuneration to the board of directors Fees to the Chairman and other external Board members are paid in accordance with the resolution at the Annual General Meeting. No Board fees are paid to the President and the employee representatives. In accordance with the resolution of the 2024 Annual General Meeting the total fee to the external Board members elected at the Meeting amounts to in total SEK 4,637,000 on an annual basis. scroll
scroll
1) Member leaves the Board and Remuneration Committee 3 July 2023 2) Member in the Board since 2 May 2023 and remuneration committee since 21 July 2023 3) Member in the Board since 2 May 2024 President and other senior executives Guidelines for renumeration For information on the guidelines for renumeration of senior executives, please refer to pages 91-92. President and CEO Alleima’s President and CEO, Göran Björkman, was paid an annual fixed salary of SEK 7,329,384. In addition, car allowance and an annual variable cash based salary of a maximum 70% of the fixed salary is payable. The variable salary for 2024 amounted to SEK 0. Göran Björkman is entitled to retire at age 65. Göran Björkman has a Swedish pension plan (ITP 2) and supplementary defined contribution plan apply under which the company each year contributes 30% of fixed salary proportions in excess of 20 price base amounts. Pension premium amounted of 29% of his annual fixed salary. In the event of termination of employment by the Company, Göran Björkman has a notice period of 12 months’ severance pay. Other senior executives Other members of the Group Executive Management are covered by a Swedish pension plan (ITP 1 or ITP 2) and for one member a German pension plan. The minimum retirement age is 62. For members of the Group Executive Management a supplementary defined contribution plan applies under which the company each year contributes 25-30% (depending on age and employment start in GEM) of fixed salary proportions in excess of 20 price base amounts. One member is covered by a German pension plan under which 3% of fixed salary is contributed. Severance pay may be paid when employment is terminated by Alleima. The severance pay corresponds to 12 months fixed salary in addition to the notice period, which is 6 months. Any other income from employment can be deducted from the severance pay. Short-term incentive program (STI) Alleima annual incentive program for senior executives, and other managers in the Group, are linked to predetermined and measurable financial criteria, measured during 2024. Senior executives except Division mangers are measured 100% on Group performance. Division managers are measured 80% on own business performance and 20% on Group performance. During 2024 the criteria’s have been related to Alleima adjusted EBIT, cash conversion and growth. Long-term incentive program (LTI) Share-based incentive program 2023-2024 The Annual General Meetings approved the Board’s proposal to adopt a performance share program for each year for a maximum 30 senior executives and key individuals in the Alleima Group, divided into three categories. For all participants, a personal investment is required in each separate program and the programs encompass a grant of a maximum total of 1,002,520 shares. All program participants have invested in Alleima shares (“investment shares”), up to an amount corresponding to 8% of the employee’s fixed annual salary before tax at December 31, 2022 and December 31, 2023, respectively. Provided certain performance targets are met, Alleima shares may be allotted (“performance shares”). The maximum number of performance shares that may be allotted for each acquired investment share depends on the category to which the participant belongs. The number of Performance Shares that will finally be allotted to the participant for each acquired Investment Share is dependent on the development of the Alleima Group’s (i) adjusted earnings per share, excluding (a) metal price effects and (b) items affecting comparability (IAC) (“adjusted EPS”) and (ii) reduction of carbon dioxide (CO2 ). The two targets (adjusted EPS and CO2 emission) are weighted among themselves at 90 and 10%, respectively, of the total target fulfilment. In January 2024, the Board of Directors established the levels regarding adjusted EPS for the performance years and CO2 emission for LTI 2024 that must be attained. After three years, 2023-2025, 2024-2026, will the outcome of the LTI 2023 and LTI 2024 be established. The level required for maximum allotment and the extent to which the established levels are attained will be disclosed in the 2025 and 2026 Annual Report. The allotments of performance shares in ongoing programs requires continuous employment and that all investment shares are held during a period of three years from the acquisition of the investment shares. In order to fulfil Alleima’s obligations under the share savings program, the company has entered into an equity swap agreement with a financial institution. Under the terms of the agreement, the financial institution has committed to deliver to participants in the program Alleima shares at the time of delivery in accordance with the terms and conditions of the program. Assumptions for determining the value, 2023-2024 LTI Program scroll
1) Based on analysts’ 3 year combined expectations. scroll
Cash-based incentive program (2022) In 2022 the Board decided upon Remuneration Committee proposal to implement a cash based LTI program, LTI 2022. The payment is conditional on continued employment in Alleima for a three-year period until the end of 2024 and the Group achieving a defined profitability target in 2022. It is limited to a maximum of 75% of the fixed annual salary for the President and CEO and 60% of the fixed annual salary for other members of the Group Executive Management. Payment will be done since the performance targets, Adjusted EBITA, set by the Board of Directors were met. Sandvik’s share-based incentive program Members of Alleima’s Group Management and other senior executives and key employees have historically participated in Sandvik’s long term share-based-incentive program (“LTI”). Sandvik AB’s Annual General Meeting 2021 resolved, at the suggestion of Sandvik AB’s Board of Directors, to introduce a performance share program for senior executives and key employees. Performance shares under the LTI 2021 would be allotted because the performance targets were met, but with the separation from the Sandvik Group, a number of the shares vesting in the program will be forfeited for persons employed by Alleima. The Company has therefore decided to compensate the participants with a cash amount corresponding to the value of the forfeited shares. The assessed fair value on the grant date, August 15, 2022 was SEK 181.45 per investment share. Payment of the amount was made 2024 provided that the participant is still employed in Alleima. Costs for the programs The following IFRS 2 provisions were made during the year:
Preparation and decision-making process The Board’s Remuneration Committee prepares issues relating to the Group Executive Management’s remuneration. The Committee met three times during the year. Issues dealt with included the magnitude of any pay increases and the long-term variable incentive program. The Board discussed the Committee’s proposals and made a decision, using the Committee’s proposal as a basis. Based on the Committee’s proposals, the Board decided on the remuneration of the President for 2024. The President decided on remuneration to other senior executives after consultation with the Committee. The Committee performed its task supported by expertise on remuneration levels and structures. For information on the composition of the Committee, refer to the Corporate Governance Report. Remuneration and other benefits pertaining to 2024 expensed during 2024, in SEK scroll
1) Amount pertaining to 2024 and expected to be paid in 2025 2) Refers to LTI 2021 payment and expensed LTI 2023-2024 3) Göran Björkmans fixed salary during 2024 amounts to 7,329,384. The remaining amount relates to vacation pay, etc. Board fees are not payable to President and CEO. 4) Pertains to the following persons in 2024: Olof Bengtsson, Ulrika Dunker, Johanna Kreft, Mikael Blazquez, Tom Eriksson, Elja Nordlöf, Claes Åkerblom, Robert Stål, Carl von Schantz Remuneration and other benefits pertaining to 2023 expensed during 2023, in SEK scroll
1) Amount pertaining 2023 and expected to be paid in 2024 2) Göran Björkman’s fixed salary 2023 amounted to 6,603,048, the remainder relates to holiday pay etc. 3) Pertains to the following individuals during 2023: Olof Bengtsson, Ulrika Dunker, Johanna Kreft, Mikael Blazquez, Tom Eriksson, Elja Nordlöf, Claes Åkerblom, Michael Andersson (Jan-Feb), Robert Stål (Mar-Dec), Nigel Haworth (Mar-Oct), Carl von Schantz (Oct-Dec) Note 4 | Fees and remuneration to auditorsscroll
Note 5 | Research, development and quality assurancescroll
Note 6 | Other operating incomescroll
Note 7 | Other operating expensesscroll
Other operating expenses consist of transaction cost related to acquisition SEK -3 million (-9) and other operating non-financial cost SEK -9 million (-4). Note 8 | Operating expensesscroll
Other expenses is mainly related to purchases of services, energy and IT. Note 9 | Net financial itemsscroll
Gain and loss from remeasurement of financial assets and liabilities are mainly temporary revaluation effects on foreign exchange derivatives due to discrepancies between contract rates and market exchange rates on the balance date. Note 10 | Income taxRecognized in profit and loss scroll
Reconciliation of the Group’s tax expense Alleima’s recognized tax expense for the year amounted to SEK 350 million (500) or 22.3% (24.1) of profit after financial items. scroll
The weighted average tax rate for Alleima calculated in accordance with the statutory tax rates in each country is 23.7% (23.4). Tax items attributable to Other comprehensive income scroll
Recognized in the balance sheet Deferred tax assets and liabilities The deferred tax assets and liabilities recognized in the balance sheet are attributable to the following assets and liabilities: scroll
Unrecognized deferred tax assets The Group has additional tax losses carried forward of SEK 51 million (48) related to Brazil. No deferred tax asset was recognized for these losses. The expiry dates of these tax losses carried forward are distributed as follows: scroll
Related deferred tax assets were not recognized since utilization of the tax losses against future taxable profits is not deemed probable in the foreseeable future. The tax value of the unrecognized tax losses carried forward amounted to SEK 17 million (16). Change of deferred tax in temporary differences an unused tax losses scroll
In addition to the deferred tax assets and liabilities, Alleima reports the following tax liabilities and receivables: scroll
Pillar 2 Alleima is covered by the OECD model rules for Pillar 2. The Group’s parent company, Alleima AB, is based in Sweden which has implemented the rules as of January 1, 2024. The rules are not expected to have a material impact on the Group for 2024. Note 11 | Earnings per sharescroll
The calculation of the numerators and denominators used in the above calculations of earnings per share are presented below. scroll
Dilution is related to the outstanding share-based LTI programs for 2023 and 2024. Refer to Note 3.5 for further information about the LTI programs. Note 12 | Intangible assetsscroll
scroll
scroll
Intangible assets scroll
Goodwill at December 31, 2024 amounted to SEK 1,693 million (1,621), essentially related to the acquisition of Kanthal in 1997. The impairment test of goodwill is presented below. For Alleima the cash-generating units (CGU) are the divisions Tube, Kanthal and Strip. The goodwill is allocated to the CGU based on where the business combinations have originally been made. scroll
The recoverable amount of the CGU has been assessed based on estimates of value in use. Calculations of value in use are based on the estimated future cash flows using forecasts covering a five-year period, which are in turn based on the five-year plans prepared annually by Alleima. The plan is founded on the Divisions’ strategies and an analysis of the current and anticipated business climate, and the impact this is expected to have on the market in which the division operates. A range of economic indicators, which differ for each market, and external and internal studies of these, are used in the analysis of the business situation. The key assumptions mentioned below reflect past experience, current and future situation and are consistent with external information. The key assumptions when determining cash flow forecasts include anticipated demand, growth rate, operating margin and working capital requirements. Alleima’s goal is to be an industry leader in sustainability. The long-term targets include reducing carbon dioxide emissions from Scope 1 and 2 by more than 50% by 2030 compared to 2019, SBTi net zero by 2050, 83% circularity in steel production and 76% circularity in generated waste. This also includes exploring, testing and implementing alternative solutions to reduce slag that ends up in landfills. The divisions build their strategies in the same way, i.e. there are plans and ambitions linked to sustainability in each strategy. It is thus also an integral part of the financial forecast for the strategy period. The factor used to calculate growth in the terminal period after five years was 2% for Alleima, the same level as used previous years. Need of working capital beyond the five-year period is deemed to increase approximately as the expected growth in the terminal period. The discount rate consists of a weighted average cost of capital for borrowed capital and shareholders’ equity. The pre-tax discount rates used for Alleima are: scroll
The specific risks of the CGU have been adjusted in future cash flow forecasts. The impairment testing of goodwill performed at year end 2024 did not indicate any impairment requirements. Sensitivity in the calculations indicates that the goodwill value would be maintained even if the discount rate was increased by 1 percentage points, the long-term growth rate was lowered by 1 percentage points, and the operating margin dropped 1 percentage points. Note 13 | Property, plant and equipmentscroll
Tangible assets scroll
scroll
Note 14 | LeasesAlleima as a lessee The arrangements in which Alleima is a lessee consist of a number of assets such as facilities for production, warehouse, office premises, certain office equipment and vehicles. Most of the facilities have a rental period of 5-10 years and for most office equipment and vehicles the period is 3-5 years. scroll
See note 21 for split of Lease liabilities on current and non-current leases. Depreciation per line item in the income statement scroll
Amounts recognized in the income statement scroll
Leasing liabilities scroll
Contracts not yet commenced At December 31, 2024, Alleima Group has entered three contracts with commenced date in 2025 or later. Alleima as a lessor The Group holds no financial leases. Alleima’s operational leases mainly consists of lease contracts related to two facilities owned by Alleima. Lease income amounted to SEK 52 millon (50). Future minimum lease payments under non--cancel-able operational lease contracts was SEK 205 million (227) at December 31, 2024. Operating leases scroll
Note 15 | Non-current financial assetsscroll
Note 16 | Inventoriesscroll
Inventories which were booked as expense amounted to SEK 15,740 million (15,409) during the year, whereof SEK 132 million (97) was related to write-down of inventories reported in cost of goods sold. Note17 | Trade receivablescroll
scroll
scroll
scroll
Note 18 | Other current receivablesscroll
Note 19 | EquityAs of December 31, 2024 Alleima’s share capital amounted to SEK 250,877,184 represented by 250,877,184 shares. To the Annual General Meeting on April 28, 2025, Alleima’s Board of Directors proposes for the financial year 2024 an ordinary dividend of SEK 2.30 per share (SEK 577,017,523), to be paid in May 2025. The remaining amount for the parent company, SEK 13,159,539,579, should be carried forward. The Board makes the assessment that the parent company’s and the group’s equity after the dividend distribution will be able to sustain the requirements which the nature, size and risks of the business will present. The Board further considers the actions reasonable in light of the parent company’s and the Group’s consolidation requirements, liquidity and position in general. The dividend distribution is assumed to not present any risk for the parent company’s or the Group’s ability to fulfil its short- or long-term payment obligations, or assumed to affect the ability to make required investments. The Annual General Meeting held on May 2, 2024, resolved for the financial year 2023 on an ordinary dividend of SEK 2.00 per share. The dividend of SEK 502 million was distributed to the shareholders on May 10, 2024, of which SEK 1 million was repaid to Alleima in form of dividend related to the equity swap for LTI 2023. Alleima’s General Meeting held on May 2, 2024 approved the Board’s proposal for a long-term share-based incentive program (LTI 2024). After a period of three years, a certain number of Alleima shares free of charge will be allotted, provided that certain performance targets are met. As of December 31, 2024, LTI 2024 comprises 306,857 share rights and LTI 2023 380,901 (403,544). The delivery of these shares is secured through an equity swap agreement with a third party. Further information regarding the incentive programs are provided in Note 3. Reserves Consolidated equity includes certain reserves which are described below. Translation reserves The translation reserve comprises all exchange differences arising from the translation of the financial statements of foreign operations into Alleima’s presentation currency. Hedge reserves Alleima apply hedge accounting for derivatives that are used to hedge the Group’s exposure to electricity-, gas- and metal price risk and for some derivatives that are used to hedge the exchange rate exposure in orders and investments. Changes in the fair value of the derivatives designated for hedge accounting are recognised in Other comprehensive income and accumulated in the Hedge reserve within equity. Refer to Note 1 for the accounting principles and Note 26 for more information on derivatives. Non-controlling interest Non-controlling interest amounted to SEK 0 million (0) and refers to Alleima Rock Drill Steel AB (RDS) in which Sandvik AB owns 10% of the company. The Class B shares held by Sandvik are not subject to future dividends. Refer to Note 27 for further information. Note 20
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Implement policies and directives |
|
|
Ensure efficient administration of the major pension plans and efficient management of reserved plan assets |
|
|
Approve establishment of new plans, material changes or closure of existing plan |
|
|
Approve guidelines for management of assets |
Investment strategy
The aims of the investment decisions made in the foundations managing plan assets are as follows:
|
Ensure that the plan assets are sufficient to cover the foundation’s future pension commitments |
|
|
Achieve optimal returns while taking into account a reasonable level of risk |
Each foundation is to have a written investment policy approved by PSB. Reviews are performed annually. The foundation makes its own decisions on its investment strategy and takes into consideration the composition of the pension commitments, requirements of cash and cash equivalents and available investment opportunities. The investment strategy is to be long-term and in line with the guidelines established by PSB.
| Information by country December 31, 2024, SEK M |
Sweden | US | Germany | Other | Total |
| Amounts included in the balance sheet | |||||
| Present value of funded and unfunded obligations | 1,955 | 26 | 176 | 158 | 2,315 |
| - of which for actives | 820 | 20 | 70 | 133 | 1,042 |
| - of which for vested deferreds | 595 | 0 | 28 | 2 | 624 |
| - of which for retirees | 540 | 6 | 79 | 25 | 650 |
| Plan assets | 1,215 | 17 | 126 | 173 | 1,530 |
| Total surplus/(deficit) | -740 | -9 | -50 | 15 | -784 |
| Other pension provisions | -35 | ||||
| Total Net liability | -820 | ||||
| Provision for pensions | -885 | ||||
| Overfunded pension plans recognized as asset, | 65 | ||||
| non-current receivable | |||||
| Funding level, % | 62 | 66 | 72 | 109 | 66 |
| Net liability for medical plans | 26 | 26 | |||
| Average duration of the obligation, years | 21 | 12 | 6 | 19 | |
| Amounts included in the income statement/ | |||||
| Other comprehensive income | |||||
| Total (Current) service cost | -29 | 0 | -4 | 1 | -32 |
| Net interest | -23 | 0 | -2 | 0 | -24 |
| Remeasurements | 40 | -15 | 2 | 6 | 32 |
| Total expense for defined benefits (pretax) | -12 | -15 | -3 | 8 | -24 |
| Amounts included in the cash flow statement | |||||
| Contributions by the employer | 0 | 0 | 2 | -6 | -4 |
| Benefits paid, net | -49 | 0 | -4 | -1 | -54 |
| Major assumptions for the valuation of the liability | |||||
| Life expectancy, years1 | 23 | 22 | 22 | ||
| Inflation, % | 2.00 | 2.50 | 2.00 | ||
| Discount rate, % (weighted average) | 3.55 | 5.20 | 3.20 | ||
| Future salary increase, % (weighted average) | 3.25 | - | 3.50 |
1) Expressed as the expected remaining life expectancy of a 65 year old in number of years.
| Information by country December 31, 2023, SEK M |
Sweden | US | Germany | Other | Total |
| Amounts included in the balance sheet | |||||
| Present value of funded and unfunded obligations | 1,819 | 204 | 160 | 147 | 2,331 |
| - of which for actives | 704 | 59 | 62 | 134 | 959 |
| - of which for vested deferreds | 547 | 14 | 19 | 2 | 582 |
| - of which for retirees | 568 | 131 | 79 | 11 | 790 |
| Plan assets | 1,056 | 183 | 117 | 162 | 1,518 |
| Total surplus/(deficit) | -763 | -21 | -43 | 15 | -812 |
| Other pension provisions | -31 | ||||
| Total Net liability | -843 | ||||
| Provision for pensions | -886 | ||||
| Overfunded pension plans recognized as asset, | 43 | ||||
| non-current receivable | |||||
| Funding level, % | 58 | 89 | 73 | 110 | 65 |
| Net liability for medical plans | 21 | 21 | |||
| Average duration of the obligation, years | 21 | 9 | 6 | 18 | |
| Amounts included in the income statement/ | |||||
| Other comprehensive income | |||||
| Total (Current) service cost | -16 | -12 | -3 | -8 | -39 |
| Net interest | -18 | -1 | -2 | 0 | -20 |
| Remeasurements | -299 | -36 | 4 | 3 | -327 |
| Total expense for defined benefits (pretax) | -333 | -48 | -1 | -5 | -388 |
| Amounts included in the cash flow statement | |||||
| Contributions by the employer | 0 | 0 | -7 | -6 | -13 |
| Benefits paid, net | -46 | 0 | -4 | 0 | -50 |
| Major assumptions for the valuation of the liability | |||||
| Life expectancy, years1 | 23 | 21 | 22 | ||
| Inflation, % | 1.75 | 2.50 | 2.25 | ||
| Discount rate, % (weighted average) | 3.45 | 5.51 | 3.90 | ||
| Future salary increase, % (weighted average) | 3.00 | - | 3.25 |
1) Expressed as the expected remaining life expectancy of a 65 year old in number of years.
Reconciliation of change in present value of defined benefit obligation for funded and unfunded plans
| SEK M | 2024 | 2023 |
| Opening balance, January 1 | 2,331 | 2,146 |
| Service cost | 41 | 29 |
| Past service cost | -8 | 11 |
| Settlements | -1 | 0 |
| Interest cost | 77 | 84 |
| Contributions by plan participants | 4 | 4 |
| Benefits paid | -82 | -99 |
| Settlements payment | -195 | 0 |
| from plan assets | ||
| Insurance premiums | -1 | -1 |
| for risk -benefits | ||
| Remeasurements loss/(gain) -arising from: | ||
| - Financial assumptions | 78 | 132 |
| - Demographic assumptions | 0 | 19 |
| - Experience adjustments | 49 | 18 |
| Exchange differences | 23 | -11 |
| Closing balance, December 31 | 2,315 | 2,331 |
Reconciliation of change in the fair value of plan assets
| SEK M | 2024 | 2023 |
| Opening balance, January 1 | 1,518 | 1,661 |
| Interest income | 52 | 65 |
| Contribution by the employer | 4 | 13 |
| Benefits paid directly by employer | 54 | 50 |
| Settlements paid by employer | 0 | 0 |
| Insurance premiums | -1 | -1 |
| for risk -benefits | ||
| Contributions by plan participants | 4 | 4 |
| Benefits paid | -82 | -99 |
| Settlements payment | -195 | 0 |
| from plan assets | ||
| Return on plan assets, excl. amount included in interest | 130 | -132 |
| Effect on asset ceiling | 29 | -27 |
| Exchange differences | 19 | -17 |
| Closing balance, December 31 | 1,530 | 1,518 |
| SEK M | 2024 | 2023 |
| Actual return on plan assets | 182 | -67 |
| Consolidation ratio for funded plans, % | 66 | 69 |
| Consolidation ratio for all plans, including unfunded, % | 66 | 65 |
| Estimated contributions for | 68 | 65 |
| the next year |
Sensitivity analysis, change in provision
| (net, SEK M) | Sweden | US | Germany |
| Life expectancy, +1 year | 82 | 0 | 4 |
| Discount rate -50 bps | 208 | 2 | 5 |
| Inflation rate +50 bps | 215 | 0 | 3 |
| Class of assets in % |
2024 | 2023 |
| Interest-bearing securities | 27 | 39 |
| Shares | 23 | 18 |
| Properties | 22 | 17 |
| Other | 22 | 20 |
| Cash and cash equivalents | 6 | 6 |
| of which assets without | 49 | 42 |
| quoted prices |
Note 21
Other interest-bearing -liabilities
| SEK M | 2024 | 2023 |
| Non-current liabilities | ||
| Lease liabilities | 327 | 378 |
| Total | 327 | 378 |
| Current liabilities | ||
| Lease liabilities | 133 | 127 |
| Total | 133 | 127 |
Changes in liabilities arising from financing activities
| Cash flow | |||
| SEK M | Jan 1, 2024 | New loans | Amortization |
| Interest-bearing non-current -liabilities | 1 | - | 0 |
| Interest-bearing current liabilities | 3 | - | -4 |
| Lease liabilities | 505 | - | -135 |
| Share swap | - | - | -20 |
| Dividends paid | - | - | -501 |
| Total | 510 | - | -660 |
| -660 | |||
| Non-cash flow changes | ||||||
| SEK M | Business combination | Reclassi-fication | New leases | Currency/FX | Other | Dec 31, 2024 |
| Interest-bearing non-current -liabilities | - | -1 | - | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Interest-bearing current liabilities | - | 1 | - | 0 | 0 | 1 |
| Lease liabilities | - | 0 | 65 | 8 | 18 | 460 |
| Share swap | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| Dividends paid | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| Total | - | 0 | 65 | 8 | 18 | 461 |
| Cash flow | |||
| SEK M | Jan 1, 2023 | New loans | Amortization |
| Interest-bearing non-current -liabilities | 9 | 0 | 0 |
| Interest-bearing current liabilities | 0 | 18 | -22 |
| Lease liabilities | 391 | - | -128 |
| Share swap | - | - | -20 |
| Dividends paid | - | - | -351 |
| Total | 401 | 18 | -521 |
| -503 | |||
| Non-cash flow changes | ||||||
| SEK M | Business combination | Reclassi-fication | New leases | Currency/FX | Other | Dec 31, 2023 |
| Interest-bearing non-current -liabilities | 0 | -8 | - | 0 | 0 | 1 |
| Interest-bearing current liabilities | 0 | 8 | - | 0 | 0 | 3 |
| Lease liabilities | 83 | 0 | 111 | -5 | 58 | 505 |
| Share swap | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| Dividends paid | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| Total | 83 | 0 | 111 | -5 | 58 | 510 |
Note 22
Other provisions
| SEK M | Warranties | Restructuring | Employee benefits | Environmental obligations |
| Balance at January 1, 2024 | 16 | 37 | 147 | 211 |
| Provisions made during the year | 4 | 0 | 63 | 2 |
| Provisions used during the year | -3 | -21 | -29 | -30 |
| Unutilized provisions reversed during the year | 0 | 0 | -3 | 0 |
| Reclassifications | 0 | 0 | 4 | 0 |
| Business combinations | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Translation differences | 0 | 0 | 2 | 0 |
| Balance at December 31, 2024 | 17 | 15 | 184 | 183 |
| of which current | 2 | 5 | 27 | 0 |
| of which non-current | 15 | 10 | 157 | 183 |
| SEK M | Legal disputes | Other obligations | Total |
| Balance at January 1, 2024 | 7 | 48 | 467 |
| Provisions made during the year | 13 | 21 | 103 |
| Provisions used during the year | -2 | -7 | -93 |
| Unutilized provisions reversed during the year | 0 | 0 | -3 |
| Reclassifications | 0 | -4 | 0 |
| Business combinations | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Translation differences | 0 | 2 | 3 |
| Balance at December 31, 2024 | 18 | 60 | 476 |
| of which current | 0 | 57 | 91 |
| of which non-current | 17 | 2 | 385 |
The provisions for environmental obligations mainly refer to waste material and slag, investigations and remedial measures in Sweden. Regarding environmental obligations, see also Note 1 Critical estimates and key judgments.
| SEK M | Warranties | Restructuring | Employee benefits | Environmental obligations |
| Balance at January 1, 2023 | 32 | 56 | 111 | 203 |
| Provisions made during the year | 1 | 32 | 74 | 41 |
| Provisions used during the year | -17 | -48 | -41 | -23 |
| Unutilized provisions reversed during the year | 0 | -3 | 0 | -11 |
| Reclassifications | 0 | 0 | 5 | 0 |
| Business combinations | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Translation differences | 0 | 0 | -2 | 0 |
| Balance at December 31, 2023 | 16 | 37 | 147 | 211 |
| of which current | 2 | 21 | 12 | 26 |
| of which non-current | 15 | 16 | 136 | 185 |
| SEK M | Legal disputes | Other obligations | Total |
| Balance at January 1, 2023 | 5 | 57 | 465 |
| Provisions made during the year | 2 | 40 | 191 |
| Provisions used during the year | 0 | -50 | -180 |
| Unutilized provisions reversed during the year | 0 | -2 | -16 |
| Reclassifications | 0 | -5 | 0 |
| Business combinations | 0 | 11 | 11 |
| Translation differences | 0 | -2 | -3 |
| Balance at December 31, 2023 | 7 | 48 | 467 |
| of which current | 1 | 39 | 101 |
| of which non-current | 6 | 8 | 366 |
Note 23
Other non-interest--bearing liabilities
| SEK M | 2024 | 2023 |
| Other non-current liabilities | ||
| Derivatives designated as | 124 | 125 |
| hedging instruments | ||
| Other | 0 | 0 |
| Total | 124 | 124 |
| Other current liabilities | ||
| Derivatives designated as | 276 | 369 |
| hedging instruments | ||
| VAT liabilities | 82 | 95 |
| Deferred purchase price business combinations | - | - |
| Other | 222 | 242 |
| Total | 580 | 706 |
Other current liabilities refers mainly to personnel related liabilities.
Note 24
Accrued expenses
| SEK M | 2024 | 2023 |
| Personnel related | 971 | 986 |
| Customer discounts | 11 | 21 |
| Other accrued expenses | 283 | 301 |
| Total | 1,264 | 1,307 |
Personnel related expenses includes social contribution, salaries and bonuses. Other accrued expenses includes accrued property tax, accrued IT costs, accrued commission to agents and accrued expenses for electricity and gas etc.
Note 25
Contingent liabilities and pledged assets
| SEK M | 2024 | 2023 |
| Bank guarantees | 148 | 174 |
| Other contingent liabilities | 141 | 141 |
| Total | 288 | 315 |
Contingent liabilities
Other contingent liabilities refer mainly to bank guarantees provided by Sandvik to cover underlying business by Alleima. Sandvik has the right to recourse against Alleima for the guarantees. Other contingent liabilities also include pension related guarantees.
Pledged assets
At the end of 2024, no assets have been pledged as collateral (0).
Note 26
Financial risk management
Financial assets and liabilities by valuation category
| Designated for hedge accounting | Fair value through profit or loss | |||
| SEK M | 2024 | 2023 | 2024 | 2023 |
| Financial assets | ||||
| Trade receivables | - | - | - | - |
| Other receivables | - | - | - | - |
| Derivatives | 51 | 227 | 3 | 100 |
| Cash and cash equivalents | - | - | - | - |
| Total financial assets | 51 | 227 | 3 | 100 |
| Financial liabilities | ||||
| Borrowings | - | - | - | - |
| Derivatives | 391 | 412 | 10 | 81 |
| Accounts payable | - | - | - | - |
| Other liabilities | - | - | - | - |
| Total financial liabilities | 391 | 412 | 10 | 81 |
| Amortized cost | Total carrying amount | |||
| SEK M | 2024 | 2023 | 2024 | 2023 |
| Financial assets | ||||
| Trade receivables | 2,911 | 2,952 | 2,911 | 2,952 |
| Other receivables | 596 | 509 | 596 | 509 |
| Derivatives | - | - | 54 | 327 |
| Cash and cash equivalents | 1,912 | 1,595 | 1,912 | 1,595 |
| Total financial assets | 5,419 | 5,057 | 5,474 | 5,384 |
| Financial liabilities | ||||
| Borrowings | 1 | 5 | 1 | 5 |
| Derivatives | - | - | 400 | 493 |
| Accounts payable | 2,249 | 2,003 | 2,249 | 2,003 |
| Other liabilities | 1,299 | 1,399 | 1,299 | 1,399 |
| Total financial liabilities | 3,550 | 3,407 | 3,950 | 3,900 |
The carrying amounts are considered to represent a good approximation of the fair values due to the short durations. All derivatives belong to Level 2 in the fair value hierarchy, i.e. observable inputs have been used in deriving the fair values.
Financial exposure and risk management
Alleima is exposed to financial risks through its global operations. The Financial Risk Management Policy is established and decided by the Board of Directors of which outlines the framework on the identified financial risks of Alleima and how it shall be managed, measured, and reported.
Group Treasury is the Group function responsible for managing most of the Group’s financial risks. The primary objective of the function is to minimize the impact on the Group’s net profit from the financial risks to which the Group is exposed.
Through internal banking operations, Group Treasury carries out its mission by supporting group companies with loans, deposits, currency and commodity hedging transactions. Through the internal transactions, the financial risks are channeled to Group Treasury, which can then measure the Group’s total risk and carry out risk mitigation measures with external parties. The function is also responsible for the infrastructure that applies to the Group’s bank accounts and payment solutions. Group account structures and netting payment solutions are important tools for Group Treasury to measure and optimally allocate the total liquidity to where there is a need within the group and minimize the number of internal transactions and the costs that comes with them. In the event of a funding need for the group, it is primarily Group Treasury that seeks financing solutions, analogously, excess liquidity is also managed by Group Treasury for an optimal return. Group Treasury assists group companies in financial matters, trade finance and credit management solutions, as well as on behalf of the pension trust funds with risk measurement and management of the pension liability and related assets.
Capital structure and dividend policy
The Group has financial targets on both capital structure and dividends. The capital structure is monitored by measuring the net debt/equity ratio and shall have a ratio below 0.3. Net debt is defined as interest-bearing current and non-current liabilities, including net pension liabilities and leases, less cash and cash equivalents. Dividend shall be on average 50% of net profit (adjusted for metal price effects) over a business cycle.
Currency risk - Transaction exposure
Transaction exposure occurs when the value of the foreign cash flows from sales and purchases fluctuate due to changes in foreign exchange rates and impacts the Group’s profit and loss. Alleima’s annual transaction exposure, meaning the Group’s net flow of currencies, after full offsetting of the counter-value in the exporting companies’ local currencies, and measured at the average exchange rate, amounted to SEK 4,691 million (4,625) in 2024. The most important currencies for one year of exposure are shown in the following diagram.
Exposure - Net flow in foreign currency

Alleima generally offers customers the possibility to pay in their own currencies through the global sales organization. As a result, the Group is continuously exposed to currency risks associated with account receivables denominated in foreign currency and with invoicing to foreign customers. Since a large percentage of production is concentrated to a few countries, while sales occur in many countries, Alleima is exposed to a large net inflow of foreign currencies.
To reduce exposure to foreign currencies, currencies received are used to pay for purchases in the same currency via a netting structure.
A certain portion of the anticipated net flow of sales and purchases is hedged through financial instruments and bank account balances in accordance with guidelines set in the Group’s policy for financial risk management. In addition, major project orders are currency hedged to protect the gross margin. Under the finance policy, the CFO has a mandate to hedge the annual transaction exposure. At year-end, the total hedged amount was SEK 5,339 million (5,375). The average duration for the hedged volume of foreign currency was 13 months (10). Unrealized gain from outstanding currency contracts for hedging of future net flows amounted to SEK -216 million (11). This amount consists of SEK -141 million (35) related to contracts maturing in 2025 and SEK -75 million (-24) related to contracts maturing in 2026 or later.
To avoid transaction risk in the balance sheets of subsidiaries, they are financed in their functional currency through Group Treasury. The currency risk that arises in Group Treasury as a result of this is managed using various derivatives to minimize the transaction risk.
If all exchange rates for the exposure currencies were to change by 5% in, for Alleima unfavorable direction, total operating profit over a 12-month period would change by approximately SEK -334 million (-351), assuming that the composition is the same as it was at year-end.
Sensitivity analysis by currency
| CAD | CHF | CZK | CNY | EUR | GBP | |
| -4 | -1 | -51 | -13 | -57 | -17 |
| JPY | KRW | NOK | USD | Other | Total | |
| -13 | -4 | -3 | -165 | -7 | -334 |
Currency risk - Translation exposure
Translation exposure occurs when assets and liabilities in subsidiaries are denominated in currencies other than Alleima’s presentation currency.
Since the Swedish krona (SEK) is Alleima’s presentation currency, a translation risk related to the valuation of the net assets in foreign subsidiaries and the profit/loss in foreign currency achieved during the period occurs. The net assets, which usually consist of the foreign subsidiaries’ shareholders equity, are translated to SEK at the rates applied at the balance sheet date. At December 31, 2024 the Group’s net assets in subsidiaries in local currencies amounted to SEK 6,815 million (6,088).
Exposure - Net assets by foreign currency

Alleima has chosen not to hedge future profits in foreign subsidiaries. Net assets are also not hedged, but the differences that arise due to changes in exchange rates are recognized directly in other comprehensive income. The diagram above shows the distribution of net assets among various currencies.
If exchange rates were to change by 5% in an unfavorable direction the net effect on other comprehensive income would be approximately SEK -341 million (-304). This net effect primarily comprises translation exposure in equity.
Sensitivity analysis by currency
| CHF | CNY | CZK | EUR | GBP | |
| -6 | -56 | -71 | -68 | -13 |
| INR | JPY | USD | Other | Total | |
| -43 | -11 | -61 | -12 | -341 |
Commodity price risk
Alleima’s financial risks related to commodities are primarily concentrated to energy such as electricity and gas and alloy metals such as nickel, molybdenum and copper.
A change in the electricity price of SEK 0.1 per kWh is estimated to affect Alleima’s operating profit by plus or minus SEK 80 million (80) on an annual basis, based on the prevailing conditions at year-end 2024. For Alleima’s largest production unit in Sweden, the electricity and gas prices are continuously hedged through derivatives.
When Alleima obtains a customer order containing a fixed price for nickel, molybdenum or copper, the prices of these materials are hedged by signing financial contracts. This means that Alleima’s operating profit is not impacted by movements in the price of these raw materials, relating to the aforementioned orders at a fixed price.
The Group applies a hedging strategy in order to minimize the metal price risk in connection with transactions conducted at a variable metal price. The measurement of inventory is not affected by hedging.
Changes in metal prices affect the profit and loss statement as a consequence of the lead time between the purchase of raw material and delivery of the finished product. The effect can be estimated through the rules regarding valuation of inventory. The net effect is presented in the “Development in business areas” section. Changes in metal prices may also lead to changes in net working capital.
Estimated consumption and hedged volumes
| Volume hedged | Hedging horizon | Average hedged price | ||
| Electricity | 800 GWh | 911 GWh | 36 months | 520 SEK/MWh |
| Gas | 190 GWh | 144 GWh | 24 months | 40 EUR/MWh |
| Nickel | 12,600 Mt | 3,031 Mt | 42 months | 16,840 USD/Mt |
| Molybden | 1,900 Mt | 271 Mt | 17 months | 22 USD/lb |
| Copper | 450 Mt | 7 Mt | 2 months | 8,950 USD/Mt |
Hedge accounting
Derivatives used in the hedging strategies are valued at fair value. To avoid impact on earnings from fluctuations in valuation of derivatives all commodity derivatives and the majority of the currency derivatives have been defined as cash flow hedges and hedge accounting is applied. The relationship between the hedging instrument and the hedged item is documen-ted when the hedging contract is made. Hedge effectiveness is measured both at the start of the hedging relationship and quarterly throughout the duration of the relationship. The effective part of changes in the fair value of the derivatives that are designated as, and qualify for, cash flow hedging is recognized in Other comprehensive income. The gain or loss relating to the effective portion of hedging instruments is recognized in the income statement within the same line as the hedged item i.e. Cost of goods sold.
Hedge accounting effect on financial position and performance for the Group
| 2024 | 2023 | |||||
| SEK M | Nominal amount of the hedge | Cash flow hedge reserve | Line item in the statement of financial position where the hedging instrument is included | Nominal amount of the hedge | Cash flow hedge reserve | Line item in the statement of financial position where the hedging instrument is included |
| Cash flow hedges | non-current/other current financial assest and non-interest-bearing liabilities/current non-interes-bearing liabilities | non-current/other current financial assest and non-interest-bearing liabilities/current non-interes-bearing liabilities | ||||
| Foreign exchange risk | ||||||
| FX Forward contracts | 4,951 | -148 | 4,089 | 238 | ||
| Commodity price risk | ||||||
| Electricity forward contracts | 911 GWh | -83 | 1,056 GWh | -296 | ||
| Gas forward contracts | 114 GWH | 6 | 132 GWh | -140 | ||
| Metal forward contracts | 3,309 tonnes | -40 | 2,952 tonnes | -216 | ||
| whereof | ||||||
| Nickel forward contracts | 3,031 tonnes | 2,607 tonnes | ||||
| Molybden forward contracts | 271 tonnes | 345 tonnes | ||||
| Copper forward contracts | 7 tonnes | 0 tonnes | ||||
| 2024 | 2023 | |||||
| SEK M | Change in fair value of the hedging instrument recognized in OCI | Hedge ineffectiveness recognized in finance net | Line item in income statement for ineffectiveness | Change in fair value of the hedging instrument recognized in OCI | Hedge ineffectiveness recognized in finance net | Line item in income statement for ineffectiveness |
| Cash flow hedges | ||||||
| Foreign exchange risk | ||||||
| FX Forward contracts | -386 | 0 | - | 96 | 0 | - |
| Commodity price risk | ||||||
| Electricity forward contracts | -23 | 0 | - | -834 | 0 | - |
| Gas forward contracts | 93 | 0 | - | -98 | 0 | - |
| Metal forward contracts | 281 | 0 | - | -129 | 0 | - |
| 2024 | 2023 | |||||
| SEK M | Amount reclassified from the cash flow hedge into profit and loss | Amount transferred from the cash flow hedgeinto cost of hedged item | Line item the in income statement that includes the -reclassified amounts | Amount reclassified from the cash flow hedge into profit and loss | Amount transferred from the cash flow hedgeinto cost of hedged item | Line item the in income statement that includes the -reclassified amounts |
| Cash flow hedges | ||||||
| Foreign exchange risk | ||||||
| FX Forward contracts | 0 | - | 0 | - | ||
| Commodity price risk | ||||||
| Electricity forward contracts | 0 | - | 0 | - | ||
| Gas forward contracts | 0 | - | 0 | - | ||
| Metal forward contracts | 0 | -165 | - | 0 | -153 | - |
Interest rate risk
Interest rate risk is defined as the impact that changes in market interest rates will have on the Group’s finance net items if a 1 percentage point change in interest rates occurs.
Depending of whether the interest bearing instrument is an asset or liability, interest risk is measured in two ways:
If Alleima has invested in an interest-bearing asset, the risk is measured as the value change of the asset from an interest rate changes.
If Alleima has interest bearing borrowings, the risk is measured as the increased interest cost for the coming twelve months is an impact of changed interest rates.
At December 31, 2024, Alleima had no interest-bearing loans with floating interest to be reset during 2025. Hence, if market rates were to rise by 1 percentage point across all terms interest costs would be impacted by SEK -0 million (-0).
The Group’s interest-rate risk arises mainly in connection with borrowing. The Group CFO has a mandate to vary the average fixed-interest term of the Group’s debt portfolio, provided that it does not exceed 36 months. At year-end, Alleima had equivalent SEK 1 million (4) in fixed interest-terms external borrowings with an average remaining time to maturity of 5 months (7).
In the event that Alleima has surplus liquidity, it is placed in bank deposits or in short-term money market instruments which means that the interest-rate risk (the risk of a change in value) is low.
Liquidity and refinancing risk
Liquidity and refinancing risk are defined as the risk that financing possibilities will be limited when loans are to be refinanced, and that payment commitments cannot be met as a result of insufficient liquidity. Mainly, all liabilities except certain derivatives, pension- and lease liabilities mature within 12 months.
According to the financial risk management policy, the Group’s capital employed (cash excluded) shall, in addition to equity, pensions liabilities, deferred tax and long-term provisions, be financed long-term (>1 year). At December 31, 2024, the Group’s capital employed, excluding cash and cash equivalents, was SEK 15,983 million (15,533) and long-term financing, including share capital, pension liabilities, long-term tax liabilities, long-term provisions and the guaranteed long-term credit facility, amounted to SEK 20,826 million (19,997). The short-term liquidity reserve, comprising committed credit facilities and accessible cash and cash equivalents was SEK 4,229 million (3,908). This reserve should at a minimum correspond to loans that mature for payment over the next six months and one-month operating expenses, calculated to SEK 1,481 million (1,501).
Alleima has a revolving credit facility of SEK 3,000 million that after extension during 2024 matures in 2029. That was the last opportunity to prolong the revolving credit facility. Alleima’s financing strategy is to achieve a well-balanced maturity profile for liabilities to thereby reduce the refinancing risk.
At December 31, 2024, SEK 1,912 million (1,595) was reported as Cash and Cash equivalent whereof SEK 1,229 million (1,021) are cash directly available for Group Treasury and SEK 683 million (574) are restricted cash such as short-term deposits and cash accounts with, for Group Treasury, limited access. The short-term deposits are considered as cash equivalent as they have a time to maturity less than
3 month.
Credit risk
The Group’s commercial and financial transactions give rise to credit risk in relation to Alleima’s counterparties. Credit risk or counterparty risk is defined as the risk for losses if the counterparty does not fulfill its commitments.
The credit risk to which Alleima is exposed to can be divided into the following categories:
|
Financial credit risk |
|
|
Credit risk in trade receivables |
Exposure
| SEK M | 2024 | 2023 |
| Trade receivables | 2,911 | 2,952 |
| Cash and cash equivalents | 1,912 | 1,595 |
| Unrealized net gains on -derivatives | 54 | 327 |
| Other receivables | 14 | 15 |
| Total | 4,892 | 4,890 |
Alleima has entered into agreements with the banks that are most important to the Group, covering such matters as the right to offset assets and liabilities that arise from financial derivative transactions, so-called ISDA agreements. This means that the Group’s counter-party exposure to the financial sector is limited to the unrealized net gains that arise in derivative agreements, and investments and bank balances. At December 31, 2024 the value of these amounted to SEK 1,967 million (1,923). Alleima only accepts financial counterparties with a solid credit rating and financial position.
Alleima is exposed to credit risk in connection with outstanding accounts receivable arising from sales of good and services to customers. The credit risk is spread over a large number of customers with various credit worthiness.
The total value of accounts receivable as per December 31, 2024 was SEK 2,911 million (2,952) while SEK 37 million (37) was reserved for doubtful accounts. The total credit losses, defined as the sum of receivables written off and change in bad debt reserve, was SEK 5 million (8) corresponding to 0.02% (0.04) of sales.
Pension commitments
The majority of the pension liability for Alleima is with its Swedish entities. Other countries with defined benefit pension plans are Germany and USA. Risks associated with Alleima’s pension obligations are amongst others, interest rate fluctuations, capital market volatility, and changes in life expectancy.
The Group-funded pension liability has an average duration of 18.9 years (18.1). The allocation to interest-bearing assets is 27% (38) of the pension portfolio. Due to the asset allocation and differences in duration between the interest-bearing assets and the liability, Alleima is exposed to interest rate fluctuations, both when discounting the liability but also as market values change in the bond portfolio. If the average discount rate falls by -50 basis points the pension liability would increase by SEK 223 million (209).
23% (17) of the pension portfolio is invested in equities. A 20% movement in the equity portfolio would result in a change in market value of SEK 71 million (54). If the life expectancy assumptions increase by one year, the pension liability would rise by 3.8% (3.4) which corresponds to SEK 89 million (80). More information on pensions and pension risks is found in
Development of pension liability and assets

In 2024, the pension assets totaled SEK 1,530 million (1,518) and the corresponding pension liability amounted to SEK 2,350 million (2,361), which is equal to a funding level of 65% (64). The value of Alleima’s pension assets changed by +1% during the year (-9). The value of the pension liability changed by -1% during the year (+9).
The pension plans are governed through a Pension Supervisory Board (PSB). PSB is responsible for imple-menting policies and directives, approving new plans or material changes and closure of existing plans.
Supply chain finance
Supply chain finance (SCF) is a financing structure linking three parties together: the buyer, the supplier and the bank or financial institution. SCF enables the buyer to receive longer payment terms while the supplier can receive early payment. Incentives for using SCF are typically cash flow enhancement and reduction of working capital. Alleima entities can play the role of either the buyer or the seller, i.e. the counterpart can be either a customer or a supplier.
When Alleima use SCF as a customer, the company receives extended payment terms. Alleima has an SCF program that suppliers can join, which gives Alleima an extended credit period of up to 120 days in exchange for the supplier to receive a discounted amount of the original invoiced amount within 10 to 15 days. Ordinary credit time is usually 30-60 days. At the end of 2024, the extended payment period was 69 (79) days on average and total debt in the program was SEK 339 million (464), whereof SEK 189 million has been paid to the supplier by the program. The debt is shown in row Accounts payables in the balance sheet and during the year the impact from non-cash movements was SEK 0 million.
Alleima using SCF being a supplier, gives extended payment terms to its clients. The payment terms are discussed on case-by-case basis. At the end of 2024 the total value of the Account Receivable program was SEK 9 million (170).
Note 27
Related parties
Transactions with shareholders
On August 31, 2022 the Alleima shares were delivered to the shareholders of Sandvik and Alleima is no longer part of the Sandvik Group.
During 2022, the subsidiary Alleima Rock Drill Steel AB (RDS) made a directed share issue to Sandvik AB regarding 10,000 B-shares in the Company, which resulted in the majority owner Alleima now owning 90% of the shares in RDS, i.e. all A-shares, and Sandvik 10%. The Class B shares held by Sandvik are not subject to future dividends. According to agreement between the parties, Alleima has, subject to certain conditions, the right, but not the obligation to acquire, Sandvik’s Class B shares at its quota value (SEK 2,778). Furthermore, Alleima has issued a call option to Sandvik, which can only be exercised if a few predetermined events occur and in the event that the call option is exercised, the purchase price shall be set at Fair Market Value. Alleima has in all previous periods presented prior to the rights issue consolidated RDS to 100%, i.e. without accounting for a non-controlling interest. In the new issue of Class B shares, Alleima reports in its consolidated financial statements a minority shareholding of SEK 2,778 corresponding to the issue proceeds that RDS received from Sandvik AB. No “profit share” belonging to the minority shareholder Sandvik AB will be reported in the future as Sandvik is not entitled to any dividend. This means that the minority share in equity will be SEK 2,778 in all future periods unless Alleima acquires Sandvik AB’s B shares in accordance with the agreement or Alleima divests RDS at fair value according to the agreement’s call option.
Compensation to key management personnel
Compensation to the Board and Group Management is disclosed in Note 3.
Note 28
Business combinations
During 2024 there were no acquisitions of business combinations executed. The acquisition of Endox that was closed in January 2025 will be presented in the interim report for the first quarter of 2025 (refer to Note 30). For the acquisition in 2023 please refer to in the Alleima Annual report 2023 Note 28.
Note 29
Government grants
Alleima has received various forms of government grants in countries where the Group operates, consisting of mainly electricity support, they amount to SEK 0 million (95).The grants have been recognized as a reduction of the cost to which the grant is attributable. The majority of the grants have no unfulfilled conditions of contingencies attached to the grants.
Note 30
Events after the close of the period
On January 14, Alleima announced the completion of its acquisition of Endox Feinwerktechnik GmbH and Endox Polska z o.o. (“Endox”), which had been previously announced on December 10, 2024. Endox strengthens the company’s medical business and will be reported in the Kanthal division.
On January 24, the Nomination Committee proposed the re-election of Board members Göran Björkman, Claes Boustedt, Ulf Larsson, Andreas Nordbrandt, Susanne Pahlén Åklundh, Victoria Van Camp and Karl Åberg. Andreas Nordbrandt is proposed to be re-elected as Chairman of the Board.
On February 26, it was announced that Per Eklund has been appointed President for the Strip division and member of the Group Executive Management from March 1, 2025.
Parent company financial information
Parent company income statement
| SEK M | Note | 2024 | 2023 |
| Revenues | 2 | 27 | 24 |
| Gross Profit | 27 | 24 | |
| Administrative expenses | -75 | -84 | |
| Other operating income | 0 | 1 | |
| Other operating expense | -2 | 0 | |
| Operating loss | -50 | -59 | |
| Dividend from Group companies | 1,076 | 485 | |
| Interest revenue and similar income | 3 | 36 | 32 |
| Interest expense and similar costs | -1 | -1 | |
| Profit after net financial items | 1,060 | 458 | |
| Appropriations | 0 | 31 | |
| Income tax | 4 | 3 | 0 |
| Profit for the year | 1,063 | 488 |
Parent company statement of comprehensive income
| SEK M | Note | 2024 | 2023 |
| Profit for the year | 1,063 | 488 | |
| Other comprehensive income | |||
| Total other comprehensive income | 0 | 0 | |
| Total comprehensive income | 1,063 | 488 |
Parent company balance sheet
| SEK M | Note | Dec 31, 2024 | Dec 31, 2023 |
| Shares in group companies | 5 | 11,907 | 11,907 |
| Deferred tax assets | 5 | 2 | |
| Non- current assets | 11,912 | 11,909 | |
| Receivables from group companies | 6 | 2,121 | 1,572 |
| Other current receivables | 10 | 3 | |
| Prepaid expenses and accrued income | 6 | 4 | |
| Current receivables | 2,136 | 1,580 | |
| Cash and cash equivalents | 0 | 0 | |
| Current assets | 2,136 | 1,580 | |
| Total assets | 14,048 | 13,490 | |
| Share capital | 251 | 251 | |
| Restricted equity | 251 | 251 | |
| Retained earnings | 12,673 | 12,700 | |
| Net profit | 1,063 | 488 | |
| Unrestricted equity | 13,737 | 13,188 | |
| Total equity | 13,987 | 13,439 | |
| Provision for pensions | 2 | 2 | |
| Non-current interest-bearing liabilities | 2 | 2 | |
| Other non-current provisions | 14 | 13 | |
| Non-current non-interest-bearing liabilities | 14 | 13 | |
| Non- current liabilities | 17 | 14 | |
| Accounts payable | 1 | 1 | |
| Current tax liabilities | 1 | 1 | |
| Other current liabilities | 2 | 1 | |
| Other liabilities to group companies | 29 | 17 | |
| Accrued expenses and deferred income | 11 | 15 | |
| Current non-interest-bearing liabilities | 44 | 36 | |
| Current liabilities | 44 | 36 | |
| Total equity and liabilities | 14,048 | 13,490 |
Parent company cash flow statement
| SEK M | Note | 2024 | 2023 |
| Operating activities | |||
| Operating loss | -50 | -59 | |
| Adjustments for non-cash items: | |||
| Other non-cash items | 3 | 12 | |
| Received interest | 35 | 32 | |
| Cash flow from operating acitivities before changes in working capital | -13 | -15 | |
| Changes in working capital | |||
| Accounts receivable | 0 | -1 | |
| Other receivables | -1 | 4 | |
| Accounts payable | 0 | -1 | |
| Other payables | -4 | 2 | |
| Changes in working capital | -5 | 4 | |
| Cash flow from operating activities | -18 | -11 | |
| Investing activities | |||
| Lending to group companies | 6 | -536 | -133 |
| Dividend and appropriations received from group companies | 1,076 | 516 | |
| Cash flow from investing activities | 540 | 383 | |
| Financing activities | |||
| Equity swap | -20 | -20 | |
| Dividend | -501 | -351 | |
| Cash flow from financing activities | -521 | -371 | |
| Net change in cash and cash equivalents | 0 | 0 | |
| Cash and cash equivalents at beginning of the year | 0 | 0 | |
| Cash and cash equivalents at end of the year | 0 | 0 |
Parent company changes in equity
| SEK M | Note | Restricted equity Share capital | Unrestricted equity Retained earnings | Total equity |
| Equity at January 1, 2023 | 251 | 13,069 | 13,320 | |
| Changes | ||||
| Net profit | - | 488 | 488 | |
| Other comprehensive income for the year, net of tax | - | 0 | 0 | |
| Total comprehensive income for the year | - | 488 | 488 | |
| Share-based payments | - | 2 | 2 | |
| Equity swap | - | -20 | -20 | |
| Dividends | - | -351 | -351 | |
| Total transactions with owners | - | -369 | -369 | |
| Equity at December 31, 2023 | 251 | 13,188 | 13,439 | |
| Changes | ||||
| Net profit | - | 1,063 | 1,063 | |
| Other comprehensive income for the year, net of tax | - | 0 | 0 | |
| Total comprehensive income for the year | - | 1,063 | 1,063 | |
| Share-based payments | - | 6 | 6 | |
| Equity swap | - | -20 | -20 | |
| Dividends | - | -501 | -501 | |
| Total transactions with owners | - | -515 | -515 | |
| Equity at December 31, 2024 | 251 | 13,737 | 13,987 |
Note 1 | Significant accounting principles - assessments and assumptions for accounting purposes
The parent company’s financial statements have been prepared according to the Swedish Annual Accounts Act and RFR 2 Reporting for legal entities and other statements issued by the Swedish Financial Reporting Board.
The parent company follows the same accounting policies as the Group (see Group Note 1) with the following exceptions.
Subsidiaries
Shares in subsidiaries are recognized at cost, including expenses directly related to the acquisition, less any impairment. Group contributions are reported as appropriations in the income statement.
Classification and measurement of financial instruments
IFRS 9 Financial Instruments is adopted, except regarding financial guarantees where the exception allowed in RFR 2 is chosen. Financial guarantees are included in contingent liabilities. Internal loans are managed by the Group’s Treasury function and all internal credit facilities are reviewed on regular basis. Internal loans are managed to collect contractual cash flows and is therefore designated as amortized cost. Impairment losses are calculated based on expected credit losses.
Other information
The annual report has been approved by the Board
of Directors on March 12, 2025. The balance sheet and income statement are subject to adoption by the Annual General Meeting on April 28, 2025.
Note 2 | Revenue
Revenues relates to sales to other companies within the Group.
Note 3 | Interest revenue and similar income
Interest revenue and similar income consist mainly of interest income from receivables from group -companies.
Note 4 | Income tax
| SEK M | 2024 | 2023 |
| Current tax expense | 0 | -1 |
| Deferred tax expense/income | 3 | 1 |
| Total tax on profit for the year | 3 | 0 |
The difference between recorded tax and the tax based on prevailing tax rate consists of the below listed components.
| SEK M | 2024 | 2023 | ||
| Profit before tax | 1,060 | 488 | ||
| Tax effect according to tax rate in Sweden | -218 | -20.6% | -101 | -20.6% |
| Tax effect of : | ||||
| Non-taxable dividend from group company | 222 | 20.9% | 100 | 20.5% |
| Other | 0 | 0.0% | 1 | 0.2% |
| Total recognized tax income | 3 | 0.3% | 0 | 0.0% |
Note 5 | Shares in group companies
| Company, reg. No ., reg’d office | Number of shares | Holding (capital / votes) | Dec 31, 2024 SEK M |
Dec 31, 2023 SEK M |
| Alleima EMEA AB, 556734-2026, Sweden | 501,000 | 100.0% | 11,907 | 11,907 |
| Alleima India Private Limited, U29308PN2019PTC182454 , India | 1 | 0.1% | 0 | 0 |
| Total shares in group companies | 11,907 | 11,907 |
| SEK M | Dec 31, 2024 | Dec 31, 2023 |
| Acquisition value at January 1 | 11,907 | 11,907 |
| Total shares in group companies | 11,907 | 11,907 |
Indirectly owned subsidiaries (not directly owned by Alleima AB)
| Company, reg. No ., reg’d office | Holding (capital / votes) |
| Alleima StripTech AB, 559250-4905, Sweden | 100% |
| Alleima Rock Drill Steel AB, 559235-0986, Sweden | 90% |
| Alleima Söderfors AB, 559415-0285, Sweden | 100% |
| Alleima PT AB, 556207-5191, Sweden | 100% |
| Alleima Treasury AB, 559216-9139, Sweden | 100% |
| Alleima Sverige AB, 559456-3321, Sweden | 100% |
| Alleima Tube AB, 556234-6832, Sweden | 100% |
| Kanthal AB, 556442-5576, Sweden | 100% |
| Alleima Denmark ApS, 42 82 89 63, Denmark | 100% |
| Alleima Finland Oy, 3228605-8, Finland | 100% |
| Kanthal Norway AS, 927733161, Norway | 100% |
| Alleima Limited, 13164633, United Kingdom | 100% |
| Alleima France SAS, 501352033, France | 100% |
| Alleima Benelux B.V., 24350347, Netherlands | 100% |
| Alleima Italia S.r.l., MI-2588812, Italy | 100% |
| Alleima Calimera S.r.l, LE-182270, Italy | 100% |
| Alleima Portugal, Unipessoal Lda., 516848720, -Portugal | 100% |
| Alleima Switzerland AG, CHE-178.868.723, -Switzerland | 100% |
| Alleima Sonceboz SA, CHE-107.535.722, Switzerland | 100% |
| Alleima Zug AG, CHE-110.271.251, Switzerland | 100% |
| Alleima Spain S.I., B67599217, Spain | 100% |
| Alleima CZ Spol. S.r.o., CZ60278773, Czech Republic | 100% |
| Alleima Karlsruhe GmbH, HRB 109839, Germany | 100% |
| Kanthal GmbH, HR B 102852, Germany | 100% |
| Alleima GmbH, HRB 12806, Germany | 100% |
| Alleima Engineering GmbH, HRB 5049, Germany | 100% |
| Alleima Special Metals, LLC, 91-0817881, USA | 100% |
| PennPower Inc, 25-1706867, USA | 100% |
| Alleima USA LLC, 82-5283200, USA | 100% |
| Alleima Precision Tube LLC, 84-3834789, USA | 100% |
| Pennsylvania Extruded Tube Co., 23-2685343, USA | 100% |
| Kanthal Corporation, 06-1057960, USA | 100% |
| Kanthal Thermal Process Inc., 94-2739405, USA | 100% |
| Alleima do Brasil Industria e Comercio Ltda, 11.149.881/0001-23, Brazil | 100% |
| A L L E I M A Advance Materials de Costa Rica SRL, 4062001304267, Costa Rica | 100% |
| Alleima Materials Technology, S.A. de C.V., SMT191120RH2, Mexico | 100% |
| Alleima Middle East DMCC, DMCC192604, United Arab Emirates | 100% |
| Alleima India Private Limited, U29308PN2019PTC182454 , India | 100% |
| Alleima Japan K.K., 9140001004795, Japan | 100% |
| Alleima Materials Technology (Jiangsu) Co., 913211916657999610, Ltd, China | 100% |
| Alleima (Shanghai) Materials Technology Co., Ltd, 91310115607381700W, China | 100% |
| Alleima Korea Co.,Ltd, 180111-1265031, Republic of Korea | 100% |
| Alleima Malaysia SDN. BHD., 6819T, Malaysia | 100% |
| Alleima South East Asia Pte. Ltd., 201942268N, -Singapore | 100% |
| Taiwan Alleima Limited, 90523423, Taiwan | 100% |
Note 6 | Receivables from group companies
| SEK M | Dec 31, 2024 | Dec 31, 2023 |
| Cash pool | 2,118 | 1,054 |
| Trade receivables group -companies | 3 | 3 |
| Other current receivables group companies | 0 | 516 |
| Total | 2,121 | 1,572 |
Note 7 | Contingent liabilities and other -commitments
At December 31, 2024, the parent company’s provided guarantees for the benefit of group companies amounted to SEK 2,904 million (2,745).
Note 8 | Employees
The average number of employees in the parent company is 9 (9), of whom 3 are women (2).
Salaries and remunerations for the Board and the President and CEO is presented below.
| SEK M | 2024 | 2023 |
| Salaries and remunerations | 15 | 13 |
| Social costs | 7 | 7 |
| Total | 23 | 21 |
| Of which, pension costs | 2 | 3 |
| recognized in social costs |
Note 9 | Fees and remuneration to auditors
Audit fees to appointed auditor was SEK 5 million (6).
Board of Directors’ and President’s certification
The Board of Directors and the President here-by certify that the Annual Report has been prepared in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles in Sweden and that the consolidated financial statements have been prepared in accordance with the international financial reporting standards referred to in the regulation (EU) no. 1606/2002 of the European Parliament and Council dated July 19, 2002, pertaining to the application of international financial reporting standards. The Annual Report and the consolidated financial statements give a true and fair view of the Parent Company’s and the Group’s financial position and results. The Report of the Directors pertaining to the Parent Company and the Group gives a fair overview of the development of the Parent Company’s and the Group’s operations, financial position, and results, and describes the significant risks and uncertainties facing the Parent Company and the companies included in the Group.
Sandviken, March 12, 2025
Andreas Nordbrandt, Chairman
Karl Åberg, Board member
Claes Boustedt, Board member
Susanne Pahlén Åklundh, Board member
Ulf Larsson, Board member
Victoria Van Camp, Board member
Göran Björkman, Board member, President and CEO
Tomas Kärnström, Board member, Employee representative
Mikael Larsson, Board member, Employee representative
Our auditors’ report was rendered on March 13, 2025
PricewaterhouseCoopers AB
Magnus Svensson Henryson, Authorised Public Accountant, Auditor-in-Charge
Auditor’s report
To the general meeting of shareholders of Alleima AB (publ), corp. id 559224-1433
Report on the annual accounts and consolidated accounts
Opinions
We have audited the annual accounts and consolidated accounts of Alleima AB (publ) for the year 2024. The annual accounts and consolidated accounts of the company are included on pages 29-73 and 78-92 of this document.
In our opinion, the annual accounts have been prepared in accordance with the Annual Accounts Act, and present fairly, in all material respects, the financial position of the Parent Company as of 31 December 2024 and its financial performance and cash flow for the year then ended in accordance with the Annual Accounts Act. The consolidated accounts have been prepared in accordance with the Annual Accounts Act and present fairly, in all material respects, the financial position of the Group as of 31 December 2024 and its financial performance and cash flow for the year then ended in accordance with International Accounting Standards (IFRS), as adopted by the EU, and the Annual Accounts Act. The statutory administration report and the corporate governance statement are consistent with the other parts of the annual accounts and consolidated accounts. The corporate governance statement is in agreement with the Annual Accounts Act.
We therefore recommend that the general meeting of shareholders adopts the income statement and balance sheet for the Parent Company and the Group.
Our opinions in this report on the annual accounts and consolidated accounts are consistent with the content of the additional report that has been submitted to the Board of the Parent Company and the Group in accordance with the Audit Regulation (537/2014) Article 11.
Basis for opinions
We have conducted our audit in accordance with the International Standards on Auditing (ISA) and generally accepted auditing standards in Sweden. Our responsibilities under these standards are further described in the Auditor’s Responsibilities section. We are independent of the Parent Company and the Group in accordance with professional ethics for accountants in Sweden and have otherwise fulfilled our ethical responsibilities in accordance with these requirements. This includes, based on the best of our knowledge and belief, that no prohibited services referred to in the Audit Regulation (537/2014) Article 5.1 have been provided to the audited company or, where applicable, its Parent Company or its controlled companies within the EU.
We believe that the audit evidence we have obtained is sufficient and adequate as a basis for our opinions.
Our audit approach
Audit scope
We have designed our audit by determining the materiality level and assessing the risk of material misstatement in the financial statements. We have considered where the Managing Director and the Board of Directors have made significant accounting estimates about future events or outcomes that are inherently uncertain. In the audit, we have also addressed the risk that the Board of Directors and the Managing Director may have overridden internal controls, including considering whether there is evidence of systematic deviations that could indicate irregularities.
We have designed our audit to enable us to provide an opinion on the financial statements as a whole, taking into account how the Group is organised, the processes for financial reporting and the industry that the business belongs to.
Materiality
The scope of our audit has been influenced by our application of materiality. An audit is designed to obtain reasonable assurance about whether the financial statements are free from material misstatement. Misstatements may arise due to fraud or error. They are considered material if they, individually or in aggregate, could reasonably be expected to influence the economic decisions of users taken on the basis of the financial statements.
Based on our professional judgement, we have determined quantitative thresholds for materiality concerning the financial statements as a whole. With the help of these and qualitative considerations, we have established the audit approach and scope as well as the nature and the timing of our audit procedures. Quantitative thresholds for materiality have also been used to assess the effect of potential misstatements, individually and in aggregate, on the financial statements as a whole.
Key audit matters
Key audit matters of the audit are those matters that, in our professional judgement, were of most significant in our audit of the annual accounts and consolidated accounts for the current period.
These matters were addressed in the context of our audit of, and in forming our opinion thereon, the annual accounts and consolidated accounts as a whole, but we do not provide separate opinions on these matters.
Description of key audit matter
Revenue recognition in the appropriate period
Revenue amounts to SEK 19,691 million in 2024 and is a material item in the consolidated accounts (see income statement and note 1 & 2).
The Group has various revenue streams that largely consist of precision strip products, seamless tubes and other long products in advanced stainless steel and alloys as well as heating materials and ultra fine wire products that are sold to customers.
Sales are generally recognised as revenue at a point in time when control has been transferred to the customers. Some significant orders are being delivered over a longer period of time and have characteristics that require additional attention to identify the transfer of control and other performance commitments so that revenue is recognised in the appropriate period.
The revenue streams are mostly transaction--rich and require robust processes with controls and monitoring in place to ensure accurate reporting.
In light of the inherent characteristics and the significant amount reported, the cut off in revenue recognition is considered a key audit matter in our audit.
How our audit addressed the key audit matter
Our audit procedures have included, but were not limited to, the procedures listed below. We have:
|
Evaluated if the Group’s accounting principles for revenue recognition comply with IFRS. |
|
|
Mapped and evaluated processes for the recognition of significant revenue streams. |
|
|
Tested a sample of IT and business process controls in revenue processes. |
|
|
Tested a sample of transactions against supporting agreements and payments, as well as obtained accounts receivable confirmation from external customers. |
|
|
Tested a sample of transactions before and after year end to assess whether revenue has been recognised in the appropriate period. |
|
|
Performed tests to verify if intra group sales have been eliminated in the consolidated accounts. |
|
|
Evaluated the information on revenue recognition presented in the annual accounts and consolidated accounts and assessed whether it provides sufficient information according to the financial reporting frameworks. |
Description of key audit matter
Measurement of inventories
The Group’s inventories amount to SEK 7,407 million as of 31 December 2024 and is a significant item in the consolidated accounts (see balance sheet and note 1 & 16).
Alleima keeps its significant stocks of raw materials, work-in-progress and finished goods at its production and sales units. An accurate measurement of volumes and cost of assets included in inventories at the balance sheet date is important for a fair presentation of gross profit.
Robust processes are required to establish the acquisition cost of a product when procurement, production and logistical processes are complex. Establishing product costing requires many instances of management judgement which has an impact on the reported values. This includes, but is not limited to, assessing normal production volumes, foreign exchange rates, prices of raw materials and allocation of direct and indirect costs. Management evaluates the condition and how sellable finished products are to measure inventories at the lower of cost and market price. Finally, there is a complexity in measuring volumes, particularly for some raw materials and work in progress, and to eliminate effects from intra group transactions
The significant nature of the item and the inherent complexity in establishing acquisition cost, makes the measurement of inventories a key audit matter in our audit.
How our audit addressed the key audit matter
Our audit procedures have included, but were not limited to, the procedures listed below. We have:
|
Evaluated if the Group’s accounting principles for the measurement of inventories comply with IFRS. |
|
|
Mapped and evaluated significant systems and processes for reporting of inventory and tested a sample of key controls in processes for establishing cost and existence. |
|
|
Tested book value of raw materials to actual prices on a sample basis. |
|
|
Assessed the reasonableness of the product costing for work in progress and finished goods. |
|
|
Participated in stock takes and performed own testing on a sample basis at a number of locations. |
|
|
Evaluated the Group’s analysis of slow movers and assessments of obsolescence. |
|
|
Traced disclosure information to accounting records and other supporting documentation. |
|
|
Read the information presented in the annual accounts and consolidated accounts and assessed whether it provides sufficient information according to IFRS. |
Other information than the annual accounts and consolidated accounts
This document also contains information other than the annual accounts and consolidated accounts, which is found on pages 1-28 and 93-133, and includes the Sustainability Report (“Other information”). The remuneration report that we obtained prior to the date of this auditor’s report also constitutes Other information. The Board of Directors and the Managing Director are responsible for Other information.
Our opinion on the annual accounts and consolidated accounts does not cover Other information and we do not express any form of assurance conclusion regarding Other information.
In connection with our audit of the annual accounts and consolidated accounts, our responsibility is to read the Other information identified above and consider whether the information is materially inconsistent with the annual accounts and consolidated accounts. In this procedure, we also take into account our knowledge obtained in the audit and assess whether Other information otherwise appears to be materially misstated.
If we, based on the work performed concerning Other information, conclude that the Other information contains a material misstatement, we are required to report this. We have nothing to report in this regard.
The Board of Directors’ and Managing -Director’s responsibilities
The Board of Directors and the Managing Director are responsible for the preparation of the annual accounts and consolidated accounts and that they give a fair presentation in accordance with the Annual Accounts Act and, concerning the consolidated accounts, in accordance with IFRS as adopted by the EU. The Board of Directors and the Managing Director are also responsible for such internal control as they determine is necessary to enable the preparation of annual accounts and consolidated accounts that are free from material misstatement, whether due to fraud or error.
In preparing the annual accounts and consolidated accounts, the Board of Directors and the Managing Director are responsible for assessing the company’s and the Group’s ability to continue as a going concern. They disclose, as applicable, matters related to going concern and using the going concern basis of accounting. The going concern assumption applies unless the Board and the Managing Director intend to liquidate the company or cease to operate or have no realistic alternative to doing so.
The auditor’s responsibility
Our objectives are to obtain reasonable assurance about whether the annual accounts and consolidated accounts as a whole are free from material misstatement, whether due to fraud or error, and to issue an auditor’s report that includes our opinions. Reasonable assurance is a high level of assurance but is not a guarantee that an audit conducted in accordance with ISAs and generally accepted auditing standards in Sweden will always detect a material misstate-ment when it exists. Misstatements can arise from fraud or error and are considered material if, individually or aggregated, they could reasonably be expected to influence the economic decisions of users taken on the basis of these annual accounts and consolidated accounts.
A further description of our responsibility for the audit of the annual accounts and consolidated accounts is available on the website of the Swedish Inspectorate of Auditors: www.revisorsinspektionen.se/revisornsansvar. This description is part of the auditor’s report.
Report on other legal and regulatory requirements
The auditors’ examination of the administration and the proposed appropriations of the profit or loss.
Opinions
In addition to our audit of the annual accounts and consolidated accounts, we have also audited the administration of the Board of Directors and the Managing Director of Alleima AB (publ) for the year 2024 as well as the proposed appropriations of the company’s profit or loss.
We recommend to the general meeting of shareholders that the profit be appropriated in accordance with the proposal in the statutory administration report and that the members of the Board of Directors and the Managing Director be discharged from liability for the financial year.
Basis of opinion
We have conducted our audit in accordance with generally accepted auditing standards in Sweden. Our responsibilities under those standards are further described in the Auditor’s Responsibilities section. We are independent of the Parent Company and the Group in accordance with professional ethics for accountants in Sweden and have otherwise fulfilled our ethical responsibilities in accordance with these requirements.
We believe that the audit evidence we have obtained is sufficient and adequate as a basis for our opinion.
The Board of Directors’ and Managing -Director’s responsibilities
Responsibility for the proposed appropriation of the company’s profit or loss rests with the Board of Directors. In conjunction with the proposal of a dividend, this includes an assessment of whether the dividend is justifiable considering the requirements which the company’s and the Group’s type of operations, size and risks place on the size of the Parent Company’s and the Group’ equity, consolidation requirements, liquidity and position in general.
The Board of Directors is responsible for the organisation and administration of the company’s affairs. This includes continuous assessment of the company’s and the Group’s financial situation and ensuring that the company’s organisation is designed so that the accounting, management of assets and the company’s financial affairs otherwise are controlled in a reassuring manner. The Managing Director is responsible for day-to-day management in accordance with the guidelines and instructions issued by the Board and is required to take such actions as may be necessary to ensure compliance with the company’s statutory accounting obligations and satisfactory management of funds.
The auditor’s responsibility
Our objective for the management audit, and thus for our opinion on release from liability, is to obtain audit evidence which enables us to assess with reasonable assurance whether any member of the Board or the Managing Director has in any material respect:
|
taken any action or been guilty of any neglect that could give rise to a liability to indemnify the company or, |
|
|
otherwise acted in contravention of the Companies Act, the Annual Accounts Act or the Articles of Association. |
Our objective in respect of our audit of the proposed appropriation of the company’s profit or loss, and thus for our opinion on the same, is to obtain reasonable assurance that the proposed appropriation is consistent with the Companies Act.
Reasonable assurance is a high level of assurance but is not a guarantee that an audit conducted in accordance with generally accepted auditing standards in Sweden will always detect actions or omissions that can give rise to liability to the company, or that the proposed appropriations of the company’s profit or loss are not in accordance with the Companies Act.
A further description of our responsibility for the audit of the administration is available on the website of the Swedish Inspectorate of Auditors: www.revisorsinspektionen.se/revisornsansvar. This description forms part of the statutory annual report.
The auditor’s opinion on the ESEF report
Opinion
In addition to our audit of the annual accounts and consolidated accounts, we have also examined whether the Board of Directors and the Managing Director have prepared the annual accounts and the consolidated accounts in a format that facilitates uniform electronic reporting (the ESEF report) according to Chapter 16, Section 4 a of the Securities Market Act (2007:528) for Alleima AB (publ) for the year 2024.
Our examination and our opinion refer only to the statutory requirement.
In our opinion, the ESEF report has been prepared in a format that in all significant respects facilitates uniform electronic reporting.
Basis for Opinion
We have conducted our examination in accordance with FAR’s recommendation, RevR 18 Examination of the Esef report. Our responsibilities under this recommendation are further described in the Auditor’s Responsibilities section. We are independent of Alleima AB (publ) in accordance with professional ethics for accountants in Sweden and have otherwise fulfilled our ethical responsibilities in accordance with these requirements.
We believe that the evidence we have obtained is sufficient and appropriate to provide a basis for our opinion.
Responsibilities of the Board of Directors and the Managing Director
The Board of Directors and the Managing Director are responsible for ensuring that the Esef report has been prepared in accordance with Chapter 16, Section 4 a of the Securities Market Act (2007:528) and for ensuring that there is such internal control as the Board of Directors and the Managing Director regard as necessary to prepare the Esef report in a manner that is free from material misstatement, whether due to fraud or error.
The auditor’s responsibility
Our responsibility is to obtain reasonable assurance whether the Esef report is in all material respects prepared in a format that meets the requirements of Chapter 16, Section 4a of the Swedish Securities Market Act (2007:528), based on the procedures performed.
RevR 18 requires us to plan and execute procedures to achieve reasonable assurance that the Esef report is prepared in a format that meets these requirements.
Reasonable assurance is a high level of assurance, but it is not a guarantee that an engagement carried out according to RevR 18 and generally accepted auditing standards in Sweden will always detect a material misstatement when it exists. Misstatements can arise from fraud or error and are considered material if, individually or in aggregate, they could reasonably be expected to influence the economic decisions of users taken on the basis of the Esef report.
The audit firm applies ISQC 1 Quality Control for Firms that Perform Audits and Reviews of Financial Statements, and other Assurance and Related Services Engagements and accordingly maintains a comprehensive system of quality control, including documented policies and procedures regarding compliance with professional ethical requirements, professional standards and legal and regulatory requirements.
The examination involves obtaining evidence, through various procedures, that the Esef report has been prepared in a format that enables uniform electronic reporting of the annual accounts and consolidated accounts. The procedures selected depend on the auditor’s judgment, including the assessment of
the risks of material misstatement in the report, whether due to fraud or error. In carrying out this risk assessment, and in order to design procedures that are appropriate in the circumstances, the auditor considers those elements of internal control that are relevant to the preparation of the Esef report by the Board of Directors and the Managing Director, but not for the purpose of expressing an opinion on the effectiveness of those internal controls. The examination also includes an evaluation of the appropriateness and reasonableness of assumptions made by the Board of Directors and the Managing Director.
The procedures mainly include a validation that the Esef report has been prepared in a valid XHTML format and a reconciliation of the Esef report with the audited annual accounts and consolidated accounts.
Furthermore, the procedures also include an assessment of whether the consolidated statement of financial performance, financial position, changes in equity, cash flow and disclosures in the Esef report has been marked with iXBRL in accordance with what follows from the Esef regulation.
PricewaterhouseCoopers AB, Torsgatan 21, SE-113 97 Stockholm, was appointed auditor of Alleima AB (publ) by the general meeting of the shareholders on 2 May 2024 and has been the company’s auditor since 28 October 2020.
Stockholm, March 13, 2025
PricewaterhouseCoopers AB
Magnus Svensson Henryson, Authorised Public Accountant, Auditor-in-Charge
This is a translation of the Swedish language original. In the event of any differences between this translation and the Swedish language original, the latter shall prevail.
Corporate governance
Corporate governance report
Board of Directors
Group Executive Management
Remuneration of senior executives
Guidelines for the remuneration of senior executives
Corporate governance report
The corporate governance report describes how Alleima applies internal and external regulations in the governance of the Group, and how these regulations are applied in the Group’s management structures and decision-making processes.
Alleima’s corporate governance and decentralized business management model are intended to make Alleima competitive in the market over the long term and to promote confidence in Alleima among all of the company’s stakeholders. Alleima’s operations must be efficiently organized, with clear areas of responsibility. The company’s financial reporting and sustainability reporting must be correct, transparent and supported by a robust framework for risk management and monitoring.
As a Swedish company listed on the Nasdaq Stockholm stock exchange, Alleima is subject to several external regulations that are relevant to how the company is governed, such as the Swedish Companies Act, the Swedish Corporate Governance Code (the “Code”) and the Nasdaq Nordic Main Market Rulebook for Issuers of Shares. Additionally, Alleima’s corporate governance is regulated by a number of internal regulations, such as the Articles of Association, the procedural guidelines for the Board of Directors, the instructions to the President and CEO and the company’s policies.
In 2024, Alleima applied the Code without any deviations.
This corporate governance report for 2024 has been prepared in accordance with the Swedish Annual Accounts Act (SFS 1995:1554) and the Code, and has been reviewed by the company’s auditors. This report describes the company’s management structure and organization. It sets out the Board’s duties and responsibilities and presents the Board’s activities during the year. It also describes Alleima’s internal control with regard to the company’s financial reporting and sustainability reporting.
1. Shareholders
As of December 31, 2024, Alleima’s share capital amounted to SEK 250,877,184 represented by 250,877,184 shares. Alleima has only one share class, and each share corresponds to one vote. Beyond this, there are no limitations as to how many votes each shareholder can cast at a General Meeting.
At year-end, Alleima had 107,306 share-holders. Two of these shareholders - AB Industri-värden and L E Lundbergföretagen AB - had direct
or indirect holdings in the company that represented at least one tenth of the number of votes for all shares in the company.
The 2024 Annual General Meeting (AGM) authorized the Board of Directors of Alleima to decide, for the period up until the 2025 AGM, on the repurchase of own shares up to a maximum of 10% of all shares in the company. Alleima has not exercised the authorization to repurchase shares and does not hold any treasury shares.
Additional information on the share and Alleima’s shareholders is provided in the section “The share” on pages 12-13.

2. General Meeting
The General Meeting is Alleima’s highest decision-making body, where shareholders exercise their voting rights. The company’s Board of Directors and auditor are elected at the AGM. The AGM also adopts the company’s income statement and balance sheet, and resolves on issues including distribution of the company’s profits, discharge from liability for the Board and CEO, and fees to Board members. If the Articles of Association, the instructions in force for the Nomination Committee, or the company’s guidelines for remuneration to senior executives are to be amended, resolutions to that effect are also made by the General Meeting.
Each shareholder that is entered in the share register, and registers their participation in accordance with the notice to attend, has the right to participate and exercise the voting rights for their shares at a General Meeting. Shareholders are also entitled to be represented by a proxy. Under the Articles of Association, the Board may also decide to allow shareholders to exercise their voting rights through postal voting. Each shareholder has, independent of the scope of their shareholding, a legal right - under certain prescribed conditions - to have a matter addressed at a General Meeting.
Alleima’s AGM must be held within six months of the end of the financial year on December 31. Normally, the AGM is held in late April or early May. At the latest, the date and location of the AGM is announced in conjunction with publication of the interim report for the third quarter. The notice to attend is issued through an announcement in Post- och Inrikes Tidningar and on the company’s website, at the earliest six weeks and at the latest four weeks ahead of the date of the AGM.
The Swedish Corporate Governance Code is available at www.bolagsstyrning.se
Further information on Alleima’s corporate governance is available at www.alleima.com, including:
| ― |
Alleima AB’s Articles of Association |
| ― |
Alleima’s instructions for the Nomination Committee |
| ― |
Corporate governance reports from previous years |
| ― |
Information on the 2025 AGM, including the notice to attend (once issued) |
| ― |
Information on the activities of the Nomination Committee ahead of the AGM |
| ― |
Information and minutes from previous AGMs |
2024 Annual General Meeting
Alleima’s 2024 AGM was held on May 2, 2024 at Göransson Arena i Sandviken, Sweden. Shareholders representing 162,996,807 shares and votes, or approximately 65% of the total number of shares and votes, were in attendance at the meeting.
The notice to attend the meeting was issued on March 26, 2024. Shareholders who wished to attend the AGM could either participate in person on the premises, via proxy or through postal voting.
The company’s Chairman of the Board, and its President and CEO, each gave presentations that were published on Alleima’s website after the meeting.
The AGM passed the following resolutions:
|
Adoption of the income statements and balance sheets for the Parent Company and the Group for 2023; |
|
|
Discharge from liability for the President and CEO, and for the Board of Directors, for the 2023 financial year; |
|
|
Adoption of the Board’s proposal for a dividend of SEK 2.00 per share; |
|
|
Election of the Board of Directors; |
|
|
Appointment of auditor; |
|
|
Resolution on fees to Board members and the auditor; |
|
|
Adoption of revised instructions for the Nomination Committee; |
|
|
Approval of the Board of Directors’ remuneration report for 2023; |
|
|
Adoption of a long-term incentive program (LTI 2024) in the form of a performance share program for 30 senior executives and key employees in the Group; and |
|
|
Authorization for the Board of Directors to make decisions on acquisitions of the company’s own shares up to a maximumof 10% of the total number of shares in the company. |
|
|
Complete minutes from the 2024 AGM and other information are available on www.alleima.com. |
3. Nomination Committee
The main task of the Nomination Committee is to prepare and submit proposals to the AGM regarding election of the Board, election of the Chairman of the Board, appointment of the auditor, and fees to Board members who are not company employees and to the auditor. The 2024 AGM adopted revised instructions for the Nomination Committee, which includes a procedure for appointing the Nomination Committee and will be valid until the AGM resolves on a change. In accordance with the instructions, the Nomination Committee shall consist of members appointed by each of the four largest shareholders in terms of the number of votes on the final business day in August and the Chairman of the Board.
The composition of the Nomination Committee is announced each year in a press release and on Alleima’s website. Information to shareholders on how to submit proposals to the Nomination Committee is also provided on the website.
In its work, the Nomination Committee specifically considers the demands that the company’s strategic development, international operations, and governance and control place on Alleima’s Board of Directors with regards to competencies and composition. The Nomination Committee applies rule 4.1 of the Code as its diversity policy. The goal of the diversity policy is that the Board shall have an appropriate composition in view of the company’s operations, phase of development and other relevant circum-stances, display diversity and breadth in terms of qualifications, experience and background of the Board members elected by the General Meeting, and promote efforts to achieve gender balance.
Nomination Committee for 2025 AGM
For the 2025 AGM, the Nomination Committee consists of Chairman Fredrik Lundberg (AB Industrivärden); Bo Selling (L E Lundbergföre-tagen AB); Martin Nilsson (Första AP-fonden); Jan Dworsky (Swedbank Robur Funds) and Alleima’s Chairman of the Board Andreas Nordbrandt. The composition of the Nomination Committee was announced in a press release and on the company’s website on September 25, 2024.
The Committee held two minuted meetings ahead of the AGM. At the statutory meeting of the Committee, the Chairman of the Board informed the Committee of the Board’s activities during the year and about the results of the Board’s annual evaluation. The Committee also met all of the Board members elected by the AGM, including the President and CEO, in separate individual meetings.
The Committee’s proposal for election of the Board was presented through a press release on January 24, 2025 and on the company’s website where the Committee proposed the re-election of all members of the Board. The other proposals of the Nomination Committee are presented in the notice to attend the 2025 AGM. The members of the Nomination Committee did not receive any remuneration from the company for their work on the Committee.
4. Board of Directors

Alleima’s Board of Directors has overall responsibility for the company’s organization and management, and is tasked with achieving profitable and sustainable development in the company in accordance with the interests of the company and its shareholders. The Board regularly evaluates the company’s strategy and long-term goals, and routinely monitors the company’s financial position, financial reporting, sustainability reporting and risk management. The Board is tasked with making decisions on issues concerning major acquisitions and investments, or significant changes in Alleima’s organization and operations. Moreover, the Board appoints the President and CEO, who is responsible for the daily operations pursuant to the Board’s guidelines and instructions.
Every year, the Board adopts written procedural guidelines for its activities. These procedural guidelines describe the Board’s duties, the Board committees to be formed and the allocation of responsibilities among the Board, the committees and the President and CEO. The Board also adopts a yearly plan that establishes which ordinary agenda items are to be addressed at the various Board meetings during the year.
Composition of the Board
As set out in Alleima’s Articles of Association, the Board is to consist of a minimum of three and a maximum of ten members, elected by the AGM. The members of the Board are elected yearly by the AGM for the period up until the next AGM. Additionally, the trade union organizations that are represented in the company’s operations have the right to jointly elect two employee representatives and two deputies to the Board.
Alleima’s Board of Directors currently consists of seven members elected by the AGM, two employee representatives and two deputies for the employee representatives. The members of the Board have experience from different industrial segments and the financial markets. Moreover, all of the Board members elected by the AGM have experience of the requirements imposed on a listed company, including through their board assignments with other companies. In electing the Board members, Rule 4.1 of the Code was applied as diversity policy for the purpose of attaining diversity as regards gender, age and experience as well as educational and occupational background. Two of the seven members (approx. 29%) elected by the AGM are women. The Board members are presented in more detail on pages 85-87.
Alleima’s Board fulfills the requirements of the Code as regards independence. Under the Code, a majority of the Board’s members must be independent in relation to the company and its management. On Alleima’s Board, all members elected by the AGM - apart from the company’s President and CEO, Göran Björkman - are independent in relation to the company and its management. Furthermore, under the Code at least two of these members must be independent in relation to the company’s major shareholders, which is achieved as all members elected by the Board apart from Karl Åberg and Claes Boustedt meet this requirement. The latter two members represent the company’s two major shareholders, AB Industrivärden and L E Lundbergföretagen AB, whose business models are built on long-term active and responsible ownership in selected holding companies.
Board activities in 2024
The Board held 13 meetings in 2024. Five of these were physical meetings held at Alleima’s premises in Sandviken or Stockholm, one was a physical meeting held during the Board’s annual trip to one of Alleima’s other production facilities, six meetings were virtual and one meeting was held per capsulam. Board member attendance is presented on pages 85-87. In advance of each meeting, an agenda and related pre-read materials were circulated to the Board members.
The President and CEO routinely reported to the Board regarding the company’s development, financial results and market conditions. The Board approved the company’s strategy for 2024-2028, and then regularly followed up on the company’s implementation of the strategy. The Division Presidents also presented the current strategies of their respective operations to the Board. During the year, the Board approved a number of major investments that expanded Alleima’s production capacity and capabilities as well as the acquisition of medical technology manufacturer Endox, with operations in Germany and Poland. Furthermore, the Board routinely oversaw the company’s financial reporting and dissemination of information to the market to ensure that they were of good quality and accurately reflected the company’s financial position. Reports from the Audit and Remuneration Committees were routinely addressed, and the Board met with the company’s auditor to discuss the auditors observations on the audit activities for the year. The Board also reviewed the company’s work in the areas of internal control, risk management, sustainability and compliance, and conducted an annual review of the Group’s Code of Conduct and other policies. During the year, particular attention was devoted to oversight of the company’s preparations for starting sustainability reporting in 2025 in accordance with the EU Corporate Sustainability Reporting Directive (CSRD), which has been enacted in Swedish law. In the fall of 2024, the Board visited Alleima’s operations at its Kanthal division in Mörfelden-Walldorf, Germany.
Remuneration to the Board
The AGM resolved that the total fees to all Board members who are elected by the AGM and who are not company employees would amount to SEK 4,637,000 for 2024. For more detailed information on remuneration of the Board, refer to pages 85-86 and Note 3.5 on page 52.
Evaluation of Board activities
The activities of the Board are evaluated annually to ensure the quality of the work, and to identify any need to add further competence or experience to the Board or to change the Board’s working methods. In 2024, the evaluation was carried out by way of each Board member responding anonymously to an online questionnaire. The Chairman of the Board then held individual discussions with each Board member, where the results were discussed. The compiled findings of the evaluations were presented to the Board as well as to the Nomination Committee.
5. Audit Committee
The foremost tasks of the Audit Committee include supporting the Board in its efforts to monitor and ensure the quality and robustness of the company’s accounting, financial reporting, sustainability reporting and dissemination of information to the market. The Committee monitors the efficiency of the Group’s internal controls, internal audits, risk management and regulatory compliance. The Committee also oversees the work of the auditor, takes positions on any discoveries during the audit, reviews the independence of the auditor and assists the Nomination Committee in its work on proposing an auditor for appointment by the AGM. The work of the Audit Committee is governed by the regulations of the Swedish Companies Act, the Code and written instructions that are revised and approved annually by the Board.
The members of the Audit Committee are selected by the Board at its statutory Board meeting after the AGM, for a period of one year at a time. In 2024, the members of the Audit Committee were Susanne Pahlén Åklundh, Karl Åberg and Claes Boustedt. Up until the statutory Board meeting in 2024, Karl Åberg was Chairman of the Committee. Susanne Pahlén Åklundh subsequently succeeded to the post. All members are independent in relation to the company and its management, and Susanne Pahlén Åklundh is also independent in relation to the company’s major shareholders. Furtermore, the Committee holds the auditing experience required under the Companies Act.
The Committee held six meetings during the year at which all members, the company’s external auditor and representatives of company management were in attendance. The Chairman of the Committee reported to the Board after each meeting, and the meeting minutes were made available to the Board.
6. Remuneration Committee
The Remuneration Committee prepares issues related to remuneration of senior executives in the company. A central task is submitting proposals to the Board regarding remuneration of the President and CEO. The Committee also oversees the establishment of remuneration of senior executives who report directly to the President and CEO. Moreover, the Committee prepares proposals for long-term incentive programs for senior executives and key employees for resolution by the General Meeting, with the purpose of setting criteria for variable remuneration that benefits the interests of the shareholders. Similarly, the Committee prepares guidelines for the remuneration of senior executives that are then resolved on by the AGM. The Committee also prepares the remuneration report that the Board compiles for every financial year and presents for approval by the AGM. Furthermore, the Committee oversees succession planning for the President and CEO, Group Executive Management, and other key roles in the group. The work of the Remuneration Committee is governed by the regulations of the Code and written instructions that are revised and approved annually by the Board.
The members of the Remuneration Committee are selected by the Board at its statutory Board meeting after the AGM, for a period of one year at a time. In 2024, the Remuneration Committee consisted of Chairman Andreas Nordbrandt and member Ulf Larsson, both of whom are independent in relation to the company and its management.
The Committee held three meetings during the year at which all members and representatives of company management were in attendance. The Chairman of the Committee repor-ted to the Board after each meeting, and the meeting minutes were presented to the Board.
For guidelines, remuneration and other bene-fits payable to Group Executive Management, refer also to pages 90-92, Note 3.5 on pages 52-53 and the remuneration report for 2024 on www.alleima.com.
7. President and CEO and Group Executive Management
The President and CEO governs the company’s daily operations in accordance with the instructions and directions of the Board. The President and CEO is responsible for ensuring that the company works toward and achieves its goals and strategic plans. Moreover, the President and CEO is responsible for preparing and providing pre-read materials to the Board ahead of Board meetings and keeping the Board up to date regarding the company’s financial position, development, risks and opportunities. The role, areas of responsibility and authority of the President and CEO are described in the instructions to the CEO, which are adopted every year by the Board.
The President and CEO is supported by Group Executive Management, to which responsibilities and authority are delegated. Group Executive Management also has an advisory function. In addition to the President and CEO, Group Executive Management includes the three Division Presidents and six managers responsible for the company’s Group functions: finance, strategy and IT, legal, communication, HR and strategic research. Group Executive Management holds minuted meetings once a month. The members of the Group Executive Management are presented further on pages 88-89.
8. Divisions and Group functions

Alleima’s business operations follow the principle of clear decentralization of responsibilities and authority. Primary operational responsibility in the company lies with the divisions and their business units, which have been delegated responsibility for pursuing and developing their respective operations in accordance with established targets and strategies. The divisions and their respective business units are responsible for their operational earnings, capital and cash flows. The business and earnings situations are regularly monitored by the President and CEO and Group Executive Management.
Alleima has three divisions, each with its own distinct product range, production and sales organization: Tube, Kanthal and Strip. The divisions are described in more detail on pages 23-28.
The Group functions have Group-wide responsibility for issues within their respective areas of responsibility, and coordinate with corresponding functions in the divisions. The Group functions are responsible for establishing policies and processes in their areas of responsibility that will apply to the company as a whole.
Alleima has seven Group functions: corporate governance and sustainability, finance, strategy and IT, legal, communication, HR and strategic research.
The policies and processes that are decided on by the Group functions and by the heads of the division functions, together with the overall principles of decentralization that Alleima applies, are jointly called “The Alleima Way” and can be divided into three blocks: management, core and supporting processes.
9. External auditor
The external auditor is a control body that is appointed every year by the AGM. The task of the external auditor is to review the company’s annual report and consolidated financial statements as well as management of the company by the President and CEO. The outcome of the external auditor’s work- the auditor’s report - is distributed to shareholders in the annual report and at the AGM. Prior to the AGM, the external auditor submits its opinion regarding the adoption of the income statements and balance sheets, appropriation of profit or loss, discharge from liability for the Board and President and CEO, and the preparation of the ESEF report.
Alleima AB’s Articles of Association state that the company is to have a minimum of one and a maximum of three auditors, with a maximum of three deputy auditors, and that a registered audit company may be appointed auditor. At the 2024 AGM, the audit firm PricewaterhouseCoopers AB was re-elected auditor of Alleima AB for the period until the 2025 AGM. Magnus Svensson Henryson is auditor-in-charge.
In accordance with its procedural guidelines, the Board met with the external auditor in 2024. Moreover, the external auditor attended every meeting of the Audit Committee. The external auditor’s activities included presenting the scope and orientation of the planned audit and submitting audit and review reports.
Audit fees are paid on an ongoing basis according to approved current invoices. For detailed information on fees paid to the external auditor, see Note 4 on page 54.
10. Internal audit
The internal audit function is subordinate to the Audit Committee. The task of the function is to provide independent and objective assurance of the company’s internal control, risk management and governance by conducting internal audits. Internal control activities are governed by written instructions that are revised and approved annually by the Audit Committee and the Board.
The basis for the internal control activities is a risk-based annual plan that is prepared using a risk analysis based on documentation from the Board, the President and CEO, Group Executive Management and the divisions. The annual plan is approved by the Audit Committee.
Nine internal audits were conducted in 2024. The head of the internal audit function attended all Audit Committee meetings during the year, and the outcomes of the internal audits were reported to the Audit Committee. Opportunities for improving the efficiency of the company’s governance and processes for internal control or risk management that were identified in internal audits were also reported to the executives responsible.
- Corporate governance report
2025 Annual General Meeting
The AGM for Alleima AB will be held on Monday, April 28, 2025 in Sandviken, Sweden. The notice to attend the AGM will be published in Post- och Inrikes Tidningar and on the company’s website. Issuance of the notice will be announced in Svenska Dagbladet and in a daily newspaper published in
Sandviken or Gävle. Documentation for decision-making will be published on Alleima’s website ahead of the AGM. Copies of these documents will also be sent to any shareholders who request them and provide their mailing address.
Internal control and risk management pertaining to financial reporting and sustainability reporting
Alleima’s internal control activities are intended to ensure that the company’s financial position and consolidation of sustainability reporting are correct and reliable, and that the company is in compliance with applicable laws and regulations.
The starting point for internal control activities is the framework for internal controls issued by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations (COSO) of the Treadway Commission. This framework identifies five integral components of internal control activities: control environment, risk assessment, control activities, information and communication, and monitoring.

I. Control environment
Alleima’s control environment is built on a clear allocation of duties and responsibilities between the company’s various bodies and functions as well as a corporate culture in which integrity, ethics and transparency are fundamental values.
The Board is ultimately responsible for ensuring that the company has an efficient system for internal control and exercises oversight through regular follow-ups of internal control activities as well as through the Audit Committee and the President and CEO. The allocation of duties is clarified in the procedural guidelines to the Board, the instructions to the Audit Committee and the instructions to the President and CEO.
The Audit Committee routinely follows up on the company’s internal control activities and prepares the Board’s work related to quality assurance of the company’s financial reporting and sustainability reporting. Additionally, both the Board and the Audit Committee meet the company’s external auditor at least once a year without company management in attendance. The President and CEO leads the practical internal control activities through Group Executive Management and the internal control function. The company’s management also has the important task of working clearly to ensure that all employees understand what is required to maintain good internal control and how they are expected to promote it.
The internal regulations for internal control activities are documented in policies, processes and manuals that are included in The Alleima Way and are reviewed and adopted annually.
II. Risk assessment
All divisions and selected Group functions perform an assessment of business risks in accordance with the enterprise risk management (ERM) methodology at least once a year, as part of their strategy work. Risks that are noted by the divisions and Group functions, as well as observations from internal and external audits, are then taken into account in the design of Alleima’s Risk and Control Matrix (RACM) internal control framework to ensure that adequate controls are established to address identified risks. Identified and relevant risks are then reported to the Audit Committee and the Board.
III. Control activities
Based on identified and relevant risks, the internal control framework is designed, addressing different control perspectives for financial reporting (ICFR - including Group functions and local entities), general IT controls (ITGC - covering main financial IT systems), sustainability reporting, and governance and risk functions. For each control perspective, an individual is appointed to monitor whether the internal control is carried out in accordance with valid procedures. In addition, the individual operations within each respective control perspective appoint an indivdual to supervise and follow up their respective local units.
IV-V. Communication, information and monitoring
Internal control is monitored regularly through self-assessments to ensure that risks are managed appropriately and in accordance with the requirements of the internal control framework. The results from the self-assessments of completed internal controls, identified deficiencies, analysis and action plans are included in the CFO’s report to the Audit Committee. The Chairman of the Audit Committee regularly reports on the Committee’s work to the Board regarding internal control. The Board also carries out an annual review of the company’s processes for internal control together with the results of completed controls and self-assessments.
Board of Directors
| Name | Andreas Nordbrandt | Karl Åberg | Claes Boustedt | Susanne Pahlén Åklundh |
| Position | Chairman of the Board | Board member | Board member | Board member |
| Chairman of the Remuneration Committee | Member of the Audit Committee | Member of the Audit Committee | Chairman of the Audit Committee | |
| Born | 1971 | 1979 | 1962 | 1960 |
| Election to the Board | 2021 | 2021 | 2021 | 2022 |
| Education | Master of Science in Mechanical Engineering from the Institute of Technology at Linköping University, Sweden. | Master of Science in Economics and Business Administration from Stockholm School of Economics, Sweden. | Master of Science in Economics and Business Administration from Stockholm School of Economics, Sweden. | Master of Science in Chemical Engineering from Lund Institute of Technology, Sweden. |
| Other material board assignments | Chairman of the board of SaltX Technology AB. | Member of the board of Essity AB and Telefonaktiebolaget L M Ericsson. | Member of the board of Sandvik AB, Hufvudstaden AB and Förvaltnings AB Lunden. | Chairman of the board of Alfdex AB. |
| as per 31 December 2024 | Member of the board of Sandvik AB. | Member of the board of ASSA ABLOY AB and Sweco AB. | ||
| Professional experience | Formerly Division President at Epiroc Underground Rock Excavation and Atlas Copco Rocktec. | Deputy CEO and head of the investment organization and the finance function at AB Industrivärden. Formerly partner an co-founder of Zeres Capital Partners AB, partner at CapMan Public Market Fund, and various positions within Handelsbanken Capital Markets. | Deputy CEO of L E Lundbergföretagen AB and CEO of L E Lundberg Kapitalförvaltning AB. Former Head of Research at Öhman Fondkommission. | Various previous positions within Alfa Laval AB, including President of the Energy Division and the Equipment Division and member of Alfa Laval Group Management. |
| Attendance | ||||
| Board meetings | 13/13 | 13/13 | 13/13 | 13/13 |
| Audit Committee meetings | - | 6/6 | 6/6 | 6/6 |
| Remuneration Committee meetings | 3/3 | - | - | - |
| Annual General Meeting | Yes | Yes | Yes | Yes |
| Independence | ||||
| In relation to the company and its management | Yes | Yes | Yes | Yes |
| In relation to major shareholders | Yes | No | No | Yes |
| Remuneration (kSEK) | 1,578 | 618 | 618 | 727 |
| Holdings1 | 9,180 | 12,000 | 30,000 | 10,000 |
1) Own and related parties’ holdings in Alleima AB (publ) as of December 31, 2024.
| Name | Ulf Larsson | Victoria Van Camp | Göran Björkman |
| Position | Board member | Board member | Board member |
| Member of Remuneration Committee | President and CEO | ||
| Born | 1962 | 1966 | 1965 |
| Election to the Board | 2023 | 2024 | 2019 |
| Education | Bachelor of Science in Forestry from the Swedish University of Agricultural Sciences in Umeå. | Master of Science in Mechanical Engineering and Ph.D. in Machine Elements from Luleå University of Technology, Sweden. | Master of Science in Mechanical Engineering from KTH Royal Institute of Technology in Stockholm, Sweden. |
| Other material board assignments | Member of the board of Swedish Forest Industries and CEPI. | Member of the board of Billerud AB, ASSA ABLOY AB, LumenRadio AB, SR Energy AB and the Chalmers University of Technology Foundation. Deputy member of the board of Viking Analytics AB. | Chairman of the board of Industriarbets-givarna i Sverige service AB. Member of the board of the Confederation of Swedish Enterprise. |
| as per 31 December 2024 | |||
| Professional experience | President and CEO of Svenska Cellulosa Aktiebolaget SCA. Former CEO of SCA Forest Products AB. Member of the Royal Swedish Academy of Engineering Sciences and the Royal Swedish Academy of Agriculture and Forestry. | Adjunct professor of Machine Elements at Luleå University of Technology. Member of the Royal Swedish Academy of Engineering Sciences. Founder and owner of consulting firm, Axa Consulting. Former CTO and President Technology, with several senior positions at SKF. | Various previous management positions within the Sandvik Group, including President of the business area Sandvik Materials Technology and member of Sandvik’s Group Executive Management Team as well as VP and Head of Global Production at AB Sandvik Coromant. |
| Attendance | |||
| Board meetings | 13/13 | 7/132) | 13/13 |
| Audit Committee meetings | - | - | - |
| Remuneration Committee meetings | 3/3 | - | - |
| Annual General Meeting | Yes | Yes | Yes |
| Independence | |||
| In relation to the company and | Yes | Yes | No |
| its management | |||
| In relation to major shareholders | Yes | Yes | Yes |
| Remuneration (kSEK) | 586 | 510 | - |
| Holdings1 | 5,000 | 1,589 | 53,523 |
1) Own and related parties’ holdings in Alleima AB (publ) as of December 31, 2024. 2) Full attendance starting from election at 2024 AGM.

Employee representatives
| Name | Tomas Kärnström | Mikael Larsson | Niclas Widell | Maria Sundqvist |
| Position | Board member | Board member | Deputy Board member | Deputy Board member |
| (appointed by IF Metall) | (appointed by Unionen) | (appointed by IF Metall) | (appointed by Akademikerföreningen) | |
| Born | 1966 | 1963 | 1974 | 1964 |
| Election to the Board | 2021 | 2021 | 2021 | 2021 |
| Attendance, Board meetings | 13/13 | 13/13 | 12/13 | 11/13 |
| Holdings1 | 577 | 27 | 24 | 144 |
1) Own and related parties’ holdings in Alleima AB (publ) as of December 31, 2024.
Group Executive Management
| Name | Göran Björkman | Carl von Schantz | Robert Stål |
| Position | President and CEO | President Tube Division | President Kanthal Division |
| Born | 1965 | 1973 | 1983 |
| In the position since | 2017 | 2023 | 2023 |
| Education | Master of Science in Mechanical Engineering from KTH Royal Institute of Technology in Stockholm, Sweden. | Master’s degree in Business Administration from Kellogg School of Management at Northwestern University and Bachelor of Arts degree in Economics from Northwestern University, USA. | Master of Science in Material Science from KTH Royal Institute of Technology, Sweden. Bachelor of Science in Business and Economics from Stockholm University, Sweden. |
| Material board assignments1 | Chairman of the board of Industriarbetsgivarna i Sverige service AB. Member of the board of the Confederation of Swedish Enterprise. | - | - |
| as per 31 December 2024 | |||
| Professional experience | Various previous management positions within the Sandvik Group, including President of the business area Sandvik Materials Technology and member of Sandvik’s Group Executive Management Team as well as Vice President and Head of Global Production at AB Sandvik Coromant. | Formerly President of the General Industry division at Atlas Copco, Senior Vice President and Head of the Energy Sector at Lantmännen, and Managing Director within the Sapa Group (now Hydro Extrusions). | Former CEO of Dafo Vehicle Fire protection; various positions within Sandvik Materials Technology, including President of Business Unit EMEA within the Tube Division, Global Sales and Marketing Manager as well as Product Manager for Nuclear Power Products within the Tube Division, and Product Manager within the Metallurgy department at ABB AB. |
| Holdings2 | 53,523 | 17,595 | 11,209 |
| Name | Per Eklund | Olof Bengtsson |
| Position | President Strip Division | CFO |
| Born | 1971 | 1961 |
| In the position since | 20253 | 2019 |
| Education | Master’s degree in Mechanical Engineering and Materials Science from Luleå University of Technology, Sweden. | Master of Science in Economics and Business Administration from Stockholm School of Economics, Sweden. |
| Material board assignments1 | - | - |
| as per 31 December 2024 | ||
| Professional experience | Formerly General Manager Marketing and Sales at the Strip Division, as well as various senior positions within the Sandvik Group, including Head of Strategy Execution and Corporate Business Development at Sandvik Coromant and other roles primarily in sales and marketing as well as business development. | Former CFO and Head of Treasury and Corporate Finance at Capio AB, Finance Director and Head of Treasury and Corporate Finance at Securitas AB, VP Treasury and Cash Management at Stora AB, and Treasury Manager at Atlas Copco AB. |
| Holdings2 | 611 | 18,936 |
Other member of Group Executive Management in 2024
Claes Åkerblom was President Strip Division until December 9, 2024.
1) Pertains to board assignments outside the Alleima Group.
2) Own and related parties’ holdings in Alleima AB (publ) as of December 31, 2024.
3) Acting since December 13, 2024. Member of Group Executive Management since March 1, 2025.
| Name | Johanna Kreft | Mikael Blazquez | Ulrika Dunker | Tom Eriksson | Elja Nordlöf |
| Position | General Counsel | EVP and Head of Strategy, M&A and IT | EVP & Head of Human Resources | EVP & Head of Strategic Research | EVP & Head of Communications |
| Born | 1976 | 1972 | 1975 | 1973 | 1985 |
| In the position since | 2015 | 2018 | 2020 | 2018 | 2018 |
| Education | Master of Laws from Uppsala University, Sweden. | Master of Science in Automatic Data Processing from University of Gävle, Sweden. | Bachelor’s degree in Education from University of Gävle, Sweden. Liquid Leader certificate from Hanken & SSE Executive Education. | Doctor of Philosophy in Materials Chemistry from Uppsala University, Sweden. Bachelor’s degree in Inorganic Chemistry from Uppsala | Master of Science in Media and Communication from University of Gävle, Sweden. |
| University, Sweden. | |||||
| Material board assignments1 | - | - | - | Member of the board of SWERIM AB. | - |
| as per 31 December 2024 | |||||
| Professional experience | Formerly Business Area General Counsel and Chief Legal Counsel at Sandvik Materials Technology, Legal Counsel at Sandvik AB, and Associate at Ahlford Advokatbyrå and Michelson & Werner Advokatbyrå. | Various previous positions within Sandvik Materials Technology, including Business Unit Manager Nuclear Power and Global Sales and Marketing Manager Nuclear Power & Aerospace within the Tube division, and various positions within Telefonaktiebolaget L M Ericsson, including Manager Market Supply Americas and Manager Customer Logistics. | Various previous positions within the Sandvik Group, including VP and Head of HR at Sandvik Venture AB and Sandvik Construction AB; Executive VP Human Resources and EHS at Ramirent AB, HR Director at Kungliga Operan AB, and HR Assistant at the Boston Consulting Group. | Various previous positions within Sandvik Materials Technology, including Head of Materials Design and Strategic Research Manager; Discovery Research Manager and Material Specialist at St. Jude Medical AB; and Researcher at Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory. | Various previous positions within the Sandvik Group, including Corporate Communications Manager and Communications Specialist; and Communications Officer at the German-Swedish Chamber of Commerce. |
| Holdings2 | 6,060 | 7,414 | 6,199 | 7,066 | 274 |
1) Pertains to board assignmenst outside the Alleima Group.
2) Own and related parties’ holdings in Alleima AB (publ) as of December 31, 2024.

Remuneration of senior executives
Remuneration of senior executives in listed companies is regulated by the Swedish Companies Act and the regulations of the Stock Market Self-Regulation Committee. The aim is for remuneration to be both market-based and predictable, and to promote the interests of the company’s shareholders.
Guidelines for the remuneration of senior executives
Under the Companies Act, listed companies must have established guidelines for remuneration of senior executives (“remuneration guidelines”).
The remuneration guidelines are adopted by the General Meeting following proposals from the Board. Under the Companies Act, proposals must be submitted at least once every four years. The proposals are prepared by the Remuneration Committee. For more information on the activities of the Remuneration Committee, refer to page 82.
The remuneration guidelines describe which types of remuneration the company can offer senior executives and how such remuneration is to promote the company’s business strategy, long-term interests and sustainability. Remuneration that is resolved on by the General Meeting (ordinary Board fees, for example) is not covered by the guidelines.
Alleima’s current remuneration guidelines were adopted by the AGM on May 2, 2023 and can be read at www.alleima.com and on page 91-92.
Board fees
Remuneration of the company’s Board members elected by the AGM is determined by the AGM. For information on Board fees for 2024, which were resolved on by the 2024 AGM, refer to pages 85-86 and Note 3.5 on page 52.
The Nomination Committee will propose fees for Board activities in 2025 for resolution by the AGM on April 28, 2025. Additional information will be included in the notice to attend the AGM when it is issued. For more information on the activities of the Nomination Committee, refer to page 80.
Remuneration of the President and CEO and Group Executive Management
Remuneration of the President and CEO is decided on by the Board after preparation by the Remuneration Committee. Remuneration to Group Executive Management is prepared by the President and CEO, and approved by the Remuneration Committee. When the Board and Remuneration Committee address and decide on remuneration issues, the individuals in company management to whom the decision pertains will not be in attendance. For more information on the activities of the Remuneration Committee, refer to page 82.
For more information on the remuneration of the President and CEO and of Group Executive Management expensed in 2024, refer to Note 3.5 on pages 52-53.
Share-related incentive programs for senior executives and other key employees
Alleima’s AGM resolved in 2023 and 2024 to offer share-related incentive programs to 30 senior executives, including the President and CEO and Group Executive Management, and other key employees.
For further information on Alleima’s current share-related and other incentive programs, refer to Note 3.5 on page 53 and alleima.com. The incentive programs are prepared by the Board and the Remuneration Committee.
For more information on the activities of the Remuneration Committee, refer to page 82.
Remuneration report for 2024
In accordance with the regulations of the Companies Act, the Board prepares an annual report on remuneration paid and outstanding covered by the remuneration guidelines for Board members elected by the AGM and for the President and CEO.
The remuneration report for 2024 will be presented for approval at the AGM on April 28, 2025 and will be available at alleima.com. The remuneration report is reviewed by the company’s auditor, who submits a statement to the Board on whether the remuneration guidelines have been observed.
Guidelines for the renumeration of senior executives
Adopted by the AGM on May 2, 2023
(Unofficial translation of the Swedish text)
Scope of the guidelines
The guidelines apply to the President and CEO and other members of Group Executive Management. The guidelines do not cover remuneration decided or approved by the General Meeting.
The guidelines’ promotion of the company’s business strategy, long-term interests and sustainability
A prerequisite for the successful implementation of the company’s business strategy and safeguarding of its long-term interests, including its sustainability, is that the company is able to recruit and retain qualified personnel. To this end, it is necessary that the company offers competitive remuneration.
The guidelines enable the company to offer senior executives a competitive total remuneration. For more information regarding the company’s business and sustainability strategy, please see the company’s website www.alleima.com.
Forms of remuneration
The total remuneration package should be based on market terms, be competitive and reflect the individual’s performance and responsibilities as well as the Group’s earnings trend. The remuneration may consist of fixed salary, variable remuneration, pension benefits and other benefits.
Fixed salary
The purpose of the fixed salary is to attract and retain senior executives with the right competence for the respective positions. The salary level should be determined by comparing the salary to similarly complex positions within a defined peer group, which may change over time.
Variable consideration
Variable share-related remuneration
The company may offer long-term share-related or share price-related remuneration. Such programs (including any cash-based incentive programs that may be offered as an alternative, when deemed appropriate) are adopted by the General Meeting and are therefore not covered by the guidelines.
Variable cash remuneration
The company may offer short or long-term variable cash remuneration. The company may only offer long-term variable cash remuneration as a three-year program and during a year when the General Meeting has not resolved to adopt a share or share price-related program.
The long-term variable cash remuneration shall be a maximum of 75% of the fixed annual cash salary, paid during the program’s third and final year, for the President and CEO, and a maximum of 60% of the fixed annual cash salary, paid during the program’s third and final year, for other members of Group Executive Management. The fulfillment of objectives for awarding such remuneration shall be measured over a period of one to three years and paid out year four.
The short-term variable cash remuneration shall be a maximum of 70% of the fixed annual cash salary for the President and CEO and a maximum of 50% of the fixed annual cash salary for other members of Group Executive Management.
Any variable cash remuneration shall be conditional upon the fulfillment of defined and measurable criteria. These criteria shall aim at promoting the company’s business strategy and performance as well as its long-term interests, including its sustainability. At the beginning of each year, the criteria are proposed by the Remuneration Committee and approved by the Board of Directors, including key performance indicators (KPIs) and the target ranges deemed relevant for the upcoming measurement period.
The criteria may be financial, and non-financial, and shall always be related to business performance. At least 80% of the variable cash remuneration shall be linked to the financial criteria.
The established KPIs shall be presented on the company’s website www.alleima.com.
The extent to which the criteria for awarding variable cash remuneration have been fulfilled shall be determined when the measurement period has ended and will be published in the remuneration report the following year. For financial criteria, the evaluation shall be based on the latest financial information made public by the company.
Special arrangements
Provided that remuneration is only made on an individual basis, the company may offer one-off remuneration in specific cases for the purpose of recruiting or retaining senior executives. The remuneration may not exceed an amount corresponding to 100% of the individual’s fixed annual salary including maximum variable cash remuneration.
Right to withhold or reclaim remuneration
Terms and conditions for variable remuneration shall be designed so that the Board of Directors (i) has the right to limit or refrain from payment of variable remuneration if exceptional economic circumstances prevail and such a measure is considered reasonable, and (ii) has the right to withhold or reclaim variable remuneration paid to an executive based on results that afterward were found to have been misstated because of wrongdoing or malpractice (so-called malus and clawback).
Pension benefits
Pension shall be paid in accordance with relevant national legislation, applicable collective agreements (or similar).
For senior executives based in Sweden, pension benefits are subject to the ITP plan (Industry and Trade Supplemental Pension). Accordingly, there are both premium-based (“defined contribution”) and benefits-based (“defined benefit”) pension undertakings, based on individual prerequisites and applicable regulations. Variable cash remuneration shall qualify for pension benefits to the extent required by mandatory collective agreement provisions (or similar) applicable to the executive.
In addition to ITP, Alleima may offer complementary pension benefits. Senior executives are offered disability pension and a defined contribution pension scheme with an Alleima approved insurance provider in accordance with Alleima’s Procurement Policy (Alleima Procurement Procedure).
For senior executives residing outside Sweden, deviations may be made for pension benefits, if required by local law or established market practice.
Total pension premiums shall not amount to more than 37.5% of the fixed annual salary.
Other benefits
Other benefits may include, for example, life insurance, medical insurance and company car benefit. Such benefits may not amount to more than 5% of the fixed annual salary. For senior executives in need of double accommodation: paid accommodation, etc. may be added in line with Alleima’s regulations and such benefits may not amount to more than 20% of the fixed annual salary.
Termination of employment
Severance pay may be paid when employment is terminated by Alleima. The President and CEO and the other senior executives may have a period of notice of not more than 12 months, in combination with severance pay correspon-ding to 6-12 months fixed salary.
When employment is terminated by the senior executive, the notice period may not exceed six months and no severance pay shall be paid.
In case a senior executive is not entitled to severance pay, but is covered by a non-compete undertaking, the senior executive may instead be compensated for such a non-compete undertaking. Any remuneration paid as compensation for a non-compete undertaking shall not exceed 60% of the fixed salary at the time of notice of termination of the employment and shall not be paid for a longer period than 18 months. Fixed salary during the notice period together with any compensation for the non--compete undertaking shall not exceed an amount equivalent to the senior executive’s fixed salary for 24 months.
Consideration of remuneration to the company’s employees
When preparing the proposal for the guidelines, the employment conditions applied within the company as a whole have been used as a benchmark, following the principle that the remuneration packages of all Alleima employees should be based on the complexity of the position, performance and market practice. In general, the same combination of remuneration components such as fixed salary, variable remuneration, pension and other benefits are offered within Alleima.
The decision-making process for determining, reviewing and implementing the guidelines
The Board of Directors has established a Remuneration Committee. The Committee’s tasks include preparing the Board of Directors’ decision to propose guidelines for senior executive remuneration.
The Remuneration Committee shall annually assess whether a revision of the guidelines is needed. The Board of Directors shall prepare a proposal for guidelines at least once every four years and submit it to the General Meeting for resolution. The guidelines shall be in force until new guidelines are adopted by the General Meeting.
The Remuneration Committee shall also monitor and evaluate programs for variable remuneration for the executive management, the application of the guidelines for senior executive remuneration as well as the current remuneration structures and compensation levels in the company.
The members of the Remuneration Committee are independent of the company and its executive management. The President and the CEO and other senior executives do not participate in the Board of Directors’ processing of and resolutions regarding remuneration related matters to the extent that they are affected by such matters.
Decisions on remuneration to the President and CEO are taken by the Board of Directors, based on proposals from the Remuneration Committee, and decisions on remuneration to the other senior executives are taken by the Remuneration Committee
Adjustment to local regulations
Remuneration under employment is subject to other rules than Swedish may be duly adjusted to comply with mandatory rules or established local practice, taking into account, to the extent possible, the overall purpose of these guidelines.
Derogation from the guidelines
The Board of Directors may temporarily resolve to derogate from the guidelines, in whole or in part, if in a specific case there is special cause for the derogation and a derogation is necessary to serve the company’s long-term interests, including its sustainability, or to ensure the company’s financial viability.
Sustainability report
General disclosures
Sustainability as a part of the commercial strategy
Material sustainability topics in the value chain95
Alleima’s focus areas
Materiality assessment
Sustainability governance
Alleima’s management of material topics
Environmental sustainability
Leadership in sustainability
Climate and circularity
Social sustainability
A responsible employer
Business ethics
Ethical business conduct
The EU Taxonomy
About this report
GRI content index
Auditor’s statement
General disclosures
Sustainability is firmly established in Alleima’s operations and is an integral part of its strategy. By contributing to making customers’ products more efficient, safer, and more sustainable, Alleima contributes to the transition of society.
Alleima is to be a competitive, respectful and reliable partner for its customers, current and future employees, as well as suppliers and other stakeholders. Sustainability is an integral part of Alleima’s strategy, and the company manages the impact on the environment, people, human rights, and operations equally with other business decisions.
Sustainability as part of the commercial strategy
Alleima is a global developer, manufacturer and supplier of high value-added products in advanced stainless steels and special alloys as well as products for industrial heating. Through its close and long-standing customer relationships, the company develops products and applications that are light, sustainable and corrosion resistant, and can withstand high temperatures and pressure.
Alleima has identified sustainability as an important success factor and driver of profitable growth. Sustainability is a natural part of all aspects of the company’s operations and is an integral part of the company’s commercial strategy. It involves continuous work to further minimize emissions and ensure employee safety and well-being.
Alleima’s greatest contribution to sustainability is through its product offering. The company’s products, based on over 900 active alloys, contribute to making customers’ products, applications and processes safer, more efficient and more sustainable. They also enable the transition to renewable sources of energy, the electrification of industries and innovations in the medical sector.
Alleima’s customers are located in ten different segments, in more than 80 countries, and the offering includes products such as seamless stainless steel tubes, electric heating technology and resistance materials, ultra-fine wire and components for medical applications, precision strip steel, and coated strip steel for hydrogen applications.
Business model and value chain
Alleima’s business model aims to deliver profitable growth and create added value for its stakeholders. With a fully integrated value chain, from research and development to final product, Alleima has the opportunity to influence and minimize the climate footprint in all phases of the production. The company’s upstream value chain consists of suppliers of direct and indirect materials. Downstream, there are customers and end products.
Alleima’s core values
We care
|
At Alleima, we take pride in what we do. We care about our customers, our people, our owners, the environment, the communities in which we operate, and the future that we share. |
We deliver
|
At Alleima, we deliver on our commitments. With a solution-oriented mindset, we enable our customers to be their very best: more efficient, more profitable, more sustainable. |
We evolve
|
At Alleima, we constantly evolve. Together, we take the lead to advance materials, ambitions, industries, ourselves - and societies for the better. |
Material sustainability topics in the value chain

Alleima’s focus areas
Alleima’s long-term sustainability agenda is based on four focus areas: climate and circularity, leadership in sustainability, being a responsible employer, and ethical business conduct.
Climate and circularity
Alleima primarily melts steel scrap instead of virgin material in its steel production. More than 80% of the company’s products consist of recycled steel. Together with the use of fossil-free electricity at the company’s production facilities, this means that Alleima has a relatively low carbon footprint. Since 2013, all of Alleima’s operations in Europe and approximately 96% worldwide use fossil-free electricity.
Leadership in sustainability
Alleima’s goal is to be an industry leader in sustainability in terms of its operations as well as its product offering. The main contribution to sustainability comes from the company’s products and solutions, which allow customers to transition to fossil-free energy, improve their energy efficiency and reduce their climate impact.
A responsible employer
Alleima’s success is largely due to the company’s ability to attract, develop and retain the right employees. Workplace health and safety is the top priority and all operations have clear plans for how the work environment and employee safety can be improved. Diversity, equality and inclusion are also prioritized areas that help employees thrive and develop.
Ethical business conduct
Alleima’s operations are to be characterized by a high level of business ethics to foster pride and create long-term value for customers, the company and society. The company has zero tolerance for corruption and bribery and places great importance on evaluating suppliers to ensure responsible sourcing.

Materiality assessment
The materiality assessment aims to assess Alleima’s impact on the outside world and the impact of the outside world on Alleima. In 2023, the company carried out its first double materiality assessment, where impacts as well as risks and opportunities were identified. In 2024, the materiality assessment was reviewed.
The materiality assessment was carried out in the following steps:
Step 1 - Mapping stakeholders and the value chain
A comprehensive mapping of Alleima’s value chain was carried out in combination with an analysis of the operating environment and interviews with stakeholders. The goal was to better understand the company’s context and pave the way for the next step in the materiality assessment.
Step 2 - Identifying impacts, risks and opportunities
A mapping of possible impacts, risks and opportunities along the value chain was carried out. This resulted in several potential material topics. Internal and external stakeholders were then identified for each topic.
Step 3 - Assessment
To establish material topics, workshops were held with internal stakeholders along with interviews with Group Executive Management and the Board. Materiality thresholds were based on these initiatives, and each topic was weighted based on scale, scope, irremediable character and likelihood. The weighting resulted in a summary of material topics.
Step 4 - Validation and documentation
The selection was then validated by the finance function and the corporate governance function, along with Group Executive Management and the Board, which resulted in a final collection of topics that are material for Alleima and that will therefore be included in the company’s sustainability reporting.
The materiality assessment was reviewed in 2024 and the descriptions of identified impacts, risks and opportunities were expanded.
The material topics identified define the scope of Alleima’s reporting. The material topics should also be reflected in the company’s sustainability targets and strategies and be integrated into its risk and business processes.
The materiality assessment covers Alleima’s entire value chain. The process and method used for the double materiality assessment and the predetermined threshold for materiality are approved annually by the Board and the Audit Committee. Topics are deemed material if they exceed the threshold for likelihood and/or impact.
The results of the double materiality assessment are reported annually to the Board and the Audit Committee. The results are also used as input for Alleima’s risk management process.
The topics deemed material are:
| ― |
Climate and energy |
| ― |
Pollution |
| ― |
Water |
| ― |
Resource use and waste |
| ― |
Health and safety |
| ― |
Diversity |
| ― |
Business ethics |
| ― |
Growth in products that support increased sustainability |
Climate and energy include reporting of greenhouse gas emissions in scope 1, 2, and 3. Pollution is reported under emissions and water. Resource use and waste cover Alleima’s material inflows and outflows of resources and their circularity, reported as metallic raw materials and waste management. Health and safety encompass both the company’s own workforce and employees in the value chain. Diversity includes the company’s own workforce. Business ethics include compliance and sustainable procurement. Alleima has also defined a company-specific material topic, the growth of products that contribute to increased sustainability.
Step 5 - Dialogue with stakeholders
Alleima’s main stakeholders are its employees, customers, owners and suppliers. The company also has common interests with the communities and organizations where it operates, both locally near its operations and at the national and global levels. There are also more distant stakeholders, such as the employees of its business partners.
Communication with stakeholders uses the same channels as other company communication, which includes interim reports, annual reports, investor calls, employee webinars and committees for consultation.
Several different stakeholder groups were involved in Alleima’s first materiality assessment as an independent company back in 2022. Interviews were carried out with a number of external stakeholders (suppliers and customers) as well as with internal stakeholders from different central functions within the Group, from the divisions and from the Board and management. In the 2023 materiality assessment, the results were expanded to include consultations with internal and external specialist experts and other external sources and reports as well as a geographic mapping of impacts, risks and opportunities. The review in 2024 included those responsible for the various topic groups as well as the Board and management.
- General disclosures
Sustainability governance

The highest responsibility for sustainability work is held by the Board of Directors of Alleima. This responsibility includes the governance and oversight of the processes needed to ensure efficiency and due diligence in various areas such as reporting, compliance with regulations and policies, as well as the international principles that Alleima follows. Alleima is governed based on its internal corporate governance framework, The Alleima Way, which implements the laws and external rules to be followed and also sets out the internal rules and principles for governance that apply specifically within Alleima.
The Alleima Way is based on three blocks: management, core and supporting processes. The processes are governed by policies, procedures and other governing documents describing the common ways of working implemented throughout the entire organization. Sustainability governance is integrated into The Alleima Way and there is a clear structure in place for how sustainability is to be managed within the company. For a more detailed description of The Alleima Way, refer to page 79 in the corporate governance report.
Alleima’s Board of Directors has the overall responsibility for sustainability reporting, monitored by the Audit Committee. Group Executive Management has the overall responsibility for the company’s strategy as well as its sustainability work and agenda, while the divisions are responsible for implementation and follow-up.
Alleima has established a Sustainability Council with representatives from various Group functions and divisions, tasked with coordinating the Group’s sustainability work. The council coordinates the preparation of sustainability governing documents, such as the Sustainability Policy and related procedures, as well as preparing materials that require approval from Group Executive Management. The head of the governance and sustainability function chairs the Sustainability Council and reports to the President and CEO.
The Sustainability Council reports to Group Executive Management quarterly. In these reviews, management is informed about any issues related to sustainability as well as the company’s progress towards its sustainability targets and plans for further progress towards reaching long-term targets. Sustainability work is reported to the Board twice per year.
The Nomination Committee is responsible for ensuring that Board members have the requisite expertise. Information from the sustainability function allows the Board to continuously develop their sustainability expertise. The Board also participates in the double materiality assessment and helps identify Alleima’s impacts, risks and opportunities.
Long- and short-term operational targets are set based on Alleima’s materiality assessment. The long-term targets are approved by the Board and management. Monitoring and follow-up of progress towards sustainability targets are integrated into the company’s overall performance review process. The targets are followed up on a monthly basis and reported to Group Executive Management on a quarterly basis. Short-term targets are followed up continuously and the results are used for deciding on improvement plans and actions.
Key performance indicators (KPIs) and other relevant information are consolidated at the Group level on a monthly, quarterly or annual basis depending on the type of target or reporting requirement.
The Annual General Meeting has adopted guidelines for variable cash remuneration for senior executives, making it conditional upon the fulfillment of defined and measurable criteria, see page 91. These criteria shall aim at promoting the company’s business strategy and performance as well as its long-term interests, including sustainability. At the beginning of each year, the criteria are proposed by the Remuneration Committee and approved by the Board of Directors, including KPIs and the target ranges deemed relevant for the upcoming measurement period. Variable remuneration for the year is based on factors such as the company’s reduction of CO2 emissions.
Policies
Alleima has a long history of operating in accordance with applicable laws and internationally recognized principles and is committed to following sustainable business practices. This involves its own internal work as well as its interactions with business partners.
Group-wide policies governing the operations are established based on The Alleima Way and the company’s risk management process. These are supported by procedures and process descriptions. Some of the company’s most important policy documents are:
| ― |
Code of Conduct |
| ― |
Supplier Code of Conduct |
| ― |
Sustainability Policy |
| ― |
People Policy |
| ― |
Procurement Policy |
| ― |
Ethics and Compliance Policy |
Alleima’s Code of Conduct provides principles for how the company is to do business and establishes responsible, ethical behavior as a requirement. There is also a separate Supplier Code of Conduct. The Codes of Conduct are based on internationally recognized principles for environmental, social and governance aspects, such as the ten principles in the UN Global Compact, the UN Universal Declaration of Human Rights, the ILO (International Labour Organization) Declaration on Fundamental Principles and Rights at Work, the Rio Declaration on Environment and Development, and he UN Convention Against Corruption.
Alleima also follows the principles in the OECD Guidelines for Multinational Enterprises, the UN Guiding Principles on Business and Human Rights, the Responsible Minerals Initiative and the UN Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs). Alleima is also a signatory to the UN Global Compact (UNGC) and reports on the ten principles in accordance with the UN Global Compact.
Alleima does not accept any form of harassment, bullying or discrimination. The company has zero tolerance for forced labor, slave labor, and child labor and supports children’s rights and the right to education. All Alleima employees have the right to join a trade union if they so wish.
The Board is ultimately responsible for the Code of Conduct, the Sustainability Policy, and the Ethics and Compliance Policy. Group Executive Management has the ultimate responsibility for the supplier Code of Conduct, the People Policy and the Procurement Policy.
The Code of Conduct and Supplier Code of Conduct can be found on Alleima’s website: www.alleima.com/sustainability/codeof-conduct.
Alleima’s commitments to respect human rights are also available on the website: www.alleima.com/sustainability/humanrights.
Risk management and internal control
The Board is ultimately responsible for establishing effective systems for risk management and internal control. Sustainability risks are managed in Alleima’s overall risk management process. The Sustainability Council helps develop the risk management process for climate-related risks and opportunities, while the HR function helps with social and workplace risk management and the compliance function helps with risks related to business ethics. he program for internal control also includes compliance follow-up, for example with the company’s Code of Conduct.
The Board reviews the company’s work in the areas of internal control, risk management, sustainability and compliance on an annual basis, with the latter including a review of the Group’s Code of Conduct and other internal policies.
In a situation that does not appear to conform with Alleima’s principles as set out in the Code of Conduct, policies, or currently prevailing law, we expect employees and business partners to bring their concerns to the company’s attention. This can be done through the company’s whistle-blower service, Speak Up. Read more on page 115.
Management system
Alleima has implemented a multi-site certification according to ISO 45001 and ISO 14001 that covers each major location and workers that perform work for Alleima at these locations. Whether a location is deemed major is based on the risk profile of that facility. If a location is not covered by a certified management system, it will instead be covered by a separate procedure under the Sustainability Policy, which aims to ensure that environmental, health and safety considerations are sufficiently addressed.
At the end of 2024, all of the company’s major locations were covered by a management
system that was verified by a third party.
Alleima’s management of material topics
Alleima’s governance, management and follow-up of material topics are presented in the following table.
| Climate and circularity | Leadership in sustainability | A responsible employer | Ethical business conduct | |
| GRI Standards | 301: Materials | Own disclosure: Growth in products that support increased sustainability | 403: Occupational Health and Safety | 205: Anti-corruption |
| 302: Energy | 405: Diversity and Equal Opportunity | 308: Supplier Environmental Assessment | ||
| 303: Water and Effluents | 406: Non-discrimination | 414: Supplier Social Assessment | ||
| 305: Emissions | ||||
| 306: Waste | ||||
| Material sustainability topics | Climate and energy | Growth in products that support increased sustainability | Health and safety | Business ethics |
| Pollution | Diversity | |||
| Water | ||||
| Resource use and waste | ||||
| Responsibility in the | Alleima sets requirements for and evaluates its suppliers, for example with respect to water consumption in material extraction. The company’s products contribute to lowering customers’ carbon footprint. | Alleima helps customers increase their circularity, reduce the weight of their products and lower their carbon footprint as well as their costs related to CO2 emissions. | In addition to taking responsibility for its own employees, Alleima strives to ensure a good work environment at its suppliers as well. This is accomplished through supplier evaluations and by following up compliance with Alleima’s Supplier Code of Conduct. | Alleima requires its suppliers to comply with the company’s business ethics principles. The company also engages with the local communities where it operates and contributes to activities that make a difference and are aligned with its values and focus areas. |
| value chain | ||||
| Reporting limitations | See page 107 | See page 111 | ||
| Way of working | Alleima strives to minimize the company’s impact on the environment and climate by using a high percentage of recycled material and renewable energy sources in production. The company also works to minimize the use of hazardous materials and conflict minerals and metals and to apply the precautionary principle when choosing materials or handling chemicals. | Products from Alleima play an essential role in developing new technologies. By continuously investing in developing the product offering, Alleima strives to be a market leader within sustainability and circularity. | Being a responsible employer is a top priority. “Safety first” is Alleima’s motto, and the company works preventively to minimize the | At Alleima, ethical business conduct means |
| number of incidents. Alleima strives to ensure that all employees thrive and develop in the company and is convinced that diversity, equality and inclusion are key to its continued success. | that all employees, contractors and partners comply with legal requirements as well as the highest ethical standards. The company | |||
| promotes a culture where ethics and compliance are essential to operations at every level. | ||||
| Outcomes | Alleima’s approach is expected to contribute to a decreasing climate impact over time. | Alleima’s main contribution to sustainability comes from the company’s products and solutions, which allow customers to transition to fossil-free energy and improve their energy efficiency. | Through active work with diversity and | Alleima’s values and corporate culture lay the foundation for sustainable business. Supplier follow-up supports ethical business conduct throughout the entire value chain. |
| inclusion, Alleima creates sustainable | ||||
| workplaces where employees thrive and grow. | ||||
| Policies | Sustainability Policy | Sustainability Policy | Code of Conduct | Code of Conduct |
| People Policy | Supplier Code of Conduct | |||
| Ethics and Compliance Policy | ||||
| Procurement Policy | ||||
| Overall targets | Reduce Scope 1 and 2 CO2 emissions by more than 50% by 2030, compared with 2019. | Grow the product portfolio of applications for the green transition, electrification, energy efficiency and improved quality of life at a faster pace than total growth. | Reduce TRIFR by more than 50% by 2030, compared with 2019. | All suppliers are required to follow the company’s Supplier Code of Conduct by 2030. |
| For a more detailed description of the target, see page 101. | The share of female managers will be one-third of the total number of managers by 2030. | For a more detailed description of the target, see page 114. | ||
| For a more detailed description of the target, see page 109. | ||||
| Governance evaluation | Sustainability reporting, energy follow-ups, emissions calculations. | Annual updates of definitions of sustainable products. | Injury frequency rate follow-up, employee surveys. | Whistleblower function follow-up, supplier follow-up. |
Environmental sustainability
Alleima’s operations have a relatively low carbon footprint due to the company’s manufacturing based on recycled steel and focused work to reduce water consumption as well as waste and emissions.
Alleima’s aim is that its activities should have as little impact on the environment as possible. Alleima’s manufacturing process is based on recycled steel as an input material and uses an electric arc furnace in production, which is more energy-efficient and has a lower climate footprint than traditional steel manufacturing.
To reduce waste and residual products, Alleima strives to use all byproducts and all waste. This includes recycling slag, which accounts for the majority of the waste generated by the operations. Alleima is also actively working to reduce its water consumption.
The company strives to be compliant with the European Chemicals Regulation (REACH) in its chemical management.
Governance and targets
Targets and priorities
| Focus area | Long-term target | Milestones 2024 | Outcome 2024 | Milestones 2025 | Status of |
| long-term target | |||||
| Leadership in sustainability | Grow the product portfolio of applications for the green transition, electrification, energy efficiency and improved quality of life at a faster pace than total growth. | This product portfolio should show higher growth than Alleima’s total growth. | This product portfolio: 0% | This product portfolio should show higher growth than Alleima’s total growth. | Satisfactory performance relative to overall growth. |
| Alleima’s total growth: -5% | |||||
| Climate and | Reduce Scope 1 and 2 CO2 emissions by more than 50% by 2030, compared with 2019. | 4.5% decline year-on-year. | 3.1% decline year-on-year. | 4.5% decline year-on-year. | 37% reduction achieved since 2019. |
| circularity | |||||
| SBTi: Net-zero by 2050. | Target validated by the SBTi. | Target not validated by the SBTi. | Target validated by the SBTi. | The proposed target has been prepared and approved internally. The application was submitted for validation. | |
| 83% circularity in steel produced. | 81.7% | 80.8% | 81.9% | A change in mix led to a higher share of high-alloy primary raw materials. | |
| 76% circularity in waste generated. | 71.6% | 74.5% | 74.8% | The waste circularity rate has in-creas--ed from 70.1% to 74.5% since the target was established in 2022. | |
| Research, test and implement alternative solutions to reduce the amount of slag sent to landfill. | Continued focus on progress in new and existing areas. | Internal work proceeded as planned. External collaboration initiated with the ambition to find alternative use for slag. | Continued focus on progress in new and existing areas. | Satisfactory progress in external partnerships provided a good basis for progress in introducing alternatives to sending slag to landfill. | |
| Outcome reported in 2024 sustain-ability report. | Outcome reported in 2025 sustainability report. |
Alleima aims to have an action plan in place at each site to increase energy and resource efficiency and reduce CO2 emissions. The company’s Sustainability Policy governs its environmental and climate work. Read more about Alleima’s policies on page 98.
In December 2022, Alleima committed to the Science Based Target initiative (SBTi), committing to set scienced-based climate targets for net-zero emissions. The SBTi will provide a third-party review of the company’s targets and confirm them. The final SBTi application was submitted for validation in early 2025, and Alleima intends to establish targets in accordance with the SBTi in 2025.
During the year, the company identified the activities that could be carried out to further reduce emissions in its own operations. These include gradually shifting technologies in processes for heat treatment and increasing the share of fossil-free electricity and biofuel when possible. The Scope 3 inventory carried out in 2023 was also supplemented with a mapping of how the upstream value chain (primarily the supply of raw materials) can be managed to reduce emissions, which is a prerequisite for Alleima to reach net-zero emissions over time.
Leadership in sustainability
Alleima’s products contribute to developing advanced technologies required to address future sustainability challenges. The company’s goal is to be a leader in sustainability and for the product portfolio for green transition applications to grow faster than for other products.
Together with customers, Alleima develops products in durable materials to enable the transition from fossil-fueled to electric furnaces. This helps to reduce both customers’ carbon footprint and costs related to CO2 emissions.The company provides applications for production, distribution and use in hydrogen, biogas production, solar and bioenergy, offshore wind, and carbon capture and storage.
To guarantee Alleima’s customers that the products have a low carbon footprint, the company implemented LCAs for rock drill steel and solid bar products. All calculations were reviewed by the independent party IVL Swedish Environmental Research Institute to ensure that the figures are accurate. Reliable LCA data means that customers can more easily calculate the CO2 emissions for their own products.

Climate and circularity
Alleima’s operations currently have a relatively low carbon footprint, primarily due to the high percentage of recycled steel used production and a large proportion of fossil-free electricity. The areas deemed most material in terms of climate and circularity are climate and energy, pollution, water, and resource use and waste. In future sustainability reports, Alleima will also report on biodiversity.
Energy and climate
Alleima emits greenhouse gases in production and in the use of fuel. The company has secured volumes of biogas that are blended with the fuel used in furnaces and heating processes and has thereby been able to reduce the amount of fossil fuels. In addition, hydrogen gas cutting tests have been performed with positive results.
CO2 emissions from the company’s own operations in 2024 amounted to approximately 93 ktons, a decrease from the previous year. Compared with the base year 2019, the total decrease was 37%.
Emissions also arise from the company’s energy consumption, primarily within production. CO2 emissions from electricity, heating and steam in 2024 amounted to approximately 10 ktons, which corresponds to approximately 11% of total emissions. 68% of the total energy consumption came from fossil-free energy sources in 2024. Alleima’s operations are by nature energy intensive.
Alleima’s largest emissions arise in the value chain (Scope 3) and are linked to purchased goods and services, capital goods, fuel and energy-related activities, travel and transportation. During the year, additional Scope 3 emissions were mapped in connection with the company’s application to have its targets approved by the Science Based Targets initiatives. Read more on page 101.
The operations contribute to air and soil pollution, mainly through its own production and indirectly from extraction facilities, for example through the use of fossil fuels or pollution generated in production processes. The company’s production in Sandviken, Söderfors and Hallstahammar requires environmental permits. The company’s facilities generate pollutants covered by Annex II (of the Industrial and Livestock Rearing Emissions Directive) that exceed the reporting threshold.
Alleima’s operations are energy intensive. An energy management system has been established to ensure efficient energy consumption. Energy shortages and energy costs represent a present risk, which is managed as part of Alleima’s risk management process. The company’s steel manufacturing is located where it has access to fossil-free electricity to run its electric arc furnace. In 2024, Alleima used 638 GWh of fossil-free electricity, corresponding to 96% of the total electricity purchased.

Water
Alleima depends on water in its production processes, especially for cooling. The purchase, use, discharge and purification of water is monitored through environmental management systems at all facilities with manufacturing operations and also strictly monitored and regulated through local environmental permits. Alleima has nine facilities in areas with high levels of water stress. Eight are administrative offices, and the ninth is a production facility in Mehsana, India, with two boreholes measuring approximately 150 meters. In the national groundwater assessment conducted in 2023, Mehsana’s groundwater was categorized as overexploited and the nearby and surrounding areas were all either critical or overexploited. To reduce this burden, water equivalent to approximately one quarter of Mehsana’s annual requirement is recirculated.
In addition to water consumption in steel production and processing, the use of water is also essential for extracting raw materials. Using recycled steel to manufacture new steel reduces water consumption considerably. Alleima’s production is approximately 80% based on secondary raw materials, which means that the company’s indirect impact in connection with the extraction of metals is relatively small compared with manufacturing, where primary raw materials are predominant. However, production is based on the use of virgin materials, which gives rise to a certain impact.
Resource use and waste
Alleima’s most significant input material is various metallic raw materials. Our products are refined products based on advanced materials technology. A metallic raw material can be remelted and used many times, without compromising quality, which creates favorable conditions for circular material handling.
To increase circularity, Alleima - in collaboration with customers - has set up several buy-back programs where we buy back materials from end-of-life products that are returned to production process.
Alleima uses certain substances that are restricted under the REACH regulation due to their effects on human health. Nickel and molybdenum are two such examples. Most of the materials that Alleima handles are exempt from use restrictions when used for industrial purposes.
Alleima’s production generates significant amounts of waste, some of which are classified as hazardous. Waste is also produced upstream in the value chain by suppliers and downstream in customer operations.
Slag from steel manufacturing is the largest waste category and is also the one with the greatest impact on the environment. Alleima works continuously to reduce the amount of slag that goes to landfill and to instead identify possible alternatives. Slag, for example, has been used as a replacement for sand in the steel mill and as a construction material for depot surfaces, both with good results. At Alleima’s industrial location in Sandviken, Sweden, there are now multiple surfaces paved with asphalt in which slag produced in-house has replaced natural materials. The surfaces have proven to hold up well despite the stress from heavy vehicles and mechanical wear and tear.
Another area where waste is reused is magnesite-based tundish lining, which is sent externally for processing and mixing with lime. The material can then be repurchased as dolomite for the steel mill.
Alleima’s ambition also includes taking responsibility for waste generated from purchased goods as well as downstream impacts from packaging materials and the company’s products. This could involve activities within sourcing to identify recyclability in products and include this knowledge in purchasing decisions. It also involves engaging with waste management suppliers to understand what recovery operations are accessible in different regions where Alleima is present.
Based on identified potential improvements, either by reducing waste generation or by moving waste streams to circular recovery methods, Alleima aims to reach 76% circularity for these, by 2030. At the end of 2024, 74.5% waste circularity was reported, excluding slag. Total waste increased by 1% to 106 ktons.
Accounting principles
Environmental data is derived from Alleima’s Environment Health and Safety (EHS) reporting system, where reporting is conducted on a quarterly basis. The KPIs compiled are based on information available at the end of the most recent year-end reporting. Energy and greenhouse gas (GHG) emission data is calculated based on reported consumption data.
The conversion factors are established in the company’s EHS definitions presented in the management system documentation. For Scope 1, these factors originate from the Swedish Environmental Protection Agency (EPA). For Scope 2, location-based emissions are derived from reported consumption and recalculated using average grid emission factors, originating from the International Energy Agency (IEA). For the market-based emissions, the consumption data uses specific emission factors. Where this has not been possible, the same factors were used as for location-based emissions.
To establish water consumption in areas with high water stress, geodata for the company’s facilities were screened using the tool provided by the World Resources Institute.
Environmental outcomes
The EU Taxonomy for sustainable investments is designed to help financial actors identify economic activities that make a substantial contribution to achieving the EU environmental objectives and strategy for green growth.
Iron and steel manufacturing is a taxonomy-eligible activity, which means that the EU Taxonomy provides a framework for determining whether investments can be considered sustainable. The adjacent diagram illustrates how the company’s activities are classified according to the KPIs defined in the taxonomy for
revenues (turnover), investments (CapEx) and a limited proportion of operating expenses (OpEx). For a complete report, see page 118.


Energy consumption
| Energy consumption, TJ | 2024 | 2023 |
| Non-renewable fuels | 1,031 | 1,063 |
| Gasoline | 2 | 2 |
| Diesel | 5 | 6 |
| LPG | 422 | 428 |
| Natural gas | 538 | 548 |
| Fuel oil | 64 | 79 |
| Renewable fuels | 262 | 205 |
| Biopropane | 4 | 2 |
| HVO | 23 | 23 |
| Biogas | 235 | 181 |
| Total energy from fuels | 1,292 | 1,268 |
| Purchased electricity | 2,375 | 2,340 |
| Self-generated electricity | 12 | 17 |
| Purchased district heating and steam | 98 | 104 |
| Total electricity, district heating and steam | 2,485 | 2,461 |
| Total energy consumption | 3,777 | 3,729 |
Water and effluents
| 2024 | 2023 | |||
| Freshwater intake by source, 1,000 m3 | Total | Of which water stressed areas | Total | Of which water stressed areas |
| Surface water | 1,918 | 0 | 1,760 | 0 |
| Groundwater | 475 | 44 | 455 | 45 |
| Purchased water | 1,094 | 7 | 1,291 | 6 |
| Collected rainwater | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Total water withdrawal | 3,487 | 51 | 3,507 | 52 |
| 2024 | 2023 | |||
| Freshwater discharge by recipient, 1,000 m3 | Total | Of which water stressed areas | Total | Of which water stressed areas |
| Surface water | 640 | 17 | 654 | 11 |
| Total | 640 | 17 | 654 | 11 |
Water consumption pertains to production units. Wastewater refers to the water used in a production process. The difference between water intake and discharge comprises the water not used in a production process and evaporation from cooling and has therefore not been reported as process wastewater. Reported intake and discharge pertain exclusively to freshwater. No wastewater is discharged into the sea, discharged into groundwater or sent to third parties for use. Accordingly, reported wastewater is assumed to be exclusively returned to the recipient as surface water. Consumption reported in water stressed areas refers to use at production units in areas classified as having high or extremely high water stress during the mapping conducted in 2024 using the Aqueduct water tool from the World Resources Institute (WRI).
Emissions
| CO2 emissions, kton CO2 eq | 2024 | 2023 |
| Scope 1 | 83 | 86 |
| Scope 2, location-based | 61 | 61 |
| Initiative to purchase fossil-free market instruments for electricity | -51 | -51 |
| Scope 2, market-based | 10 | 10 |
| Total Scope 1 and 2, location-based | 145 | 148 |
| Total Scope 1 and 2, market-based | 93 | 96 |
| Biogenic emissions pertaining to, but outside the total for, Scope 1 and 2 | 21 | 17 |
| CO2 emissions, kton CO 2 eq | 2024 |
| Scope 3 | |
| 3.1 Purchased goods and services | 520 |
| 3.2 Capital goods | 22 |
| 3.3 Fuel- and energy-related activities | 28 |
| (not included in Scope 1 or Scope 2) | |
| 3.4 Upstream transportation and distribution | 32 |
| 3.5 Waste generated in operations | 5 |
| 3.6 Business travel | 3 |
| 3.7 Employee commuting | 8 |
| 3.8 Upstream leased assets | - |
| 3.9 Downstream transportation and distribution | Not available |
| 3.10 Processing of sold products | 7 |
| 3.11 Use of sold products | - |
| 3.12 End-of-life treatment of sold products | 1 |
| 3.13 Downstream leased assets | 0 |
| 3.14 Franchises | - |
| 3.15 Investments | - |
| Total Scope 3 | 627 |
Scope 3 emissions calculation is based on an annual data collection and a data model defined according to the GHG Protocol framework.
The following categories are either immaterial in relation to the totals or have been deemed too impractical to measure in relation to the amount of emissions they are deemed to include. They are therefore not included in the simplified data collection and calculations have largely been based on assumptions: 3.7 and 3.10.
The following categories are not applicable: 3.8, 3.11, 3.14 and 3.15. Data is not available for category 3.9.
| CO2 emissions by division, ton | Scope 1 | Scope 2 | Scope 1 + 2 | |
| Division | Fuels | Process-based | Electricity, district heating, steam | Total |
| Tube | 57,132 | 22,032 | 5,521 | 84,686 |
| Kanthal | 3,419 | 316 | 4,705 | 8,439 |
| Strip | 285 | 0 | 33 | 318 |
| Total | 60,836 | 22,348 | 10,259 | 93,443 |
| Significant emissions to air and water, kg | 2024 | 2023 |
| NOx to air | 156,000 | 190,000 |
| Hazardous air pollutants (HAP) to air | 481 | 832 |
| Zinc to air | 490 | 770 |
| Nitrogen to water | 86,364 | 70,241 |
| Nickel to water | 106 | 124 |
| Fluorine to water | 5,695 | 6,581 |
Values of emissions to air and water refer to the production unit in Sandviken, which is the only operation that meets the thresholds in Annex II of Regulation (EC) No 166/2006 of the European Parliament and of the Council. Alleima also measures SOx and particulate values in the air and persistent organic compounds, as well as calculates NMVOC in the air. These values are below the thresholds in Annex II. While emissions of zinc are not included in the HAP, the value exceeds the threshold in Annex II.
Accounting principles Scope 3
In 2024, greenhouse gas (GHG) data for scope 3 was included for the first time in Alleima’s sustainability reporting. The GHG inventory was based on a combination of activity data primarily from internal data sources and to some extent on emissions data from both internal and external data sources. The data set is considered complete for the most significant emission category, with a focus on obtaining a high proportion of primary data and supplier-specific emissions data, especially for raw material purchases in category 1. For other, less significant categories, expenditure data was used extensively. However, the calculation of greenhouse gas emissions based on expenditure data has higher uncertainty than using activity data such as consumption in weight, volume, or number of items. The accounting system and data model built for greenhouse gas accounting are based on the greenhouse gas protocol. Conversion factors come from suppliers where available; otherwise, industry averages have been used. For expenditure-based data, conversion factors from Exiobase have been used. Some categories were deemed not applicable, some were based on surveys, assumptions, and extrapolation. No primary data was available, and no data model based on assumptions was set up for downstream transportation. To some extent, this information is included in category 1. How these emissions will be reported will be determined at a later stage. More information per category is provided in the footnote under the table for Scope 3 emissions data.
Materials
| Metallic raw materials | 2024 | 2023 |
| Primary, kton | 47 | 45 |
| Secondary, kton | 195 | 182 |
| Recycled steel rate, % | 80.8 | 80.0 |
Metals are non-renewable, 100% recyclable materials.
Waste
| Waste by type, ton | Generated | Circular | Non-circular |
| Slag | 56,104 | 3,775 | 52,329 |
| Metals | 15,499 | 15,496 | 3 |
| Sludge | 6,199 | 43 | 6,155 |
| Industrial dust | 5,975 | 5,931 | 44 |
| Uncategorized | 4,408 | 3,083 | 1,325 |
| Emulsions | 4,153 | 2,611 | 1,542 |
| Mill scales | 4,092 | 4,092 | 0 |
| Other | 9,098 | 5,583 | 3,515 |
| Total | 105,527 | 40,614 | 64,913 |
| Waste by disposal method and legal classification, ton | Total | On site | Off site |
| Circular, hazardous waste | 10,145 | 0 | 10,145 |
| Reuse | 73 | 0 | 73 |
| Recycle | 10,072 | 0 | 10,072 |
| Circular, non-hazardous waste | 30,469 | 15,545 | 14,924 |
| Reuse | 3,390 | 0 | 3,390 |
| Recycle | 27,080 | 15,545 | 11,535 |
| Non-circular, hazardous waste | 8,398 | 2,390 | 6,008 |
| Incineration, energy recovery | 845 | 0 | 845 |
| Incineration | 781 | 0 | 781 |
| Landfill | 6,427 | 2,390 | 4,037 |
| Unspecified | 346 | 0 | 346 |
| Non-circular, non-hazardous waste | 56,515 | 48,244 | 8,270 |
| Incineration, energy recovery | 1,516 | 0 | 1,516 |
| Incineration | 18 | 0 | 18 |
| Landfill | 54,469 | 48,244 | 6,224 |
| Unspecified | 512 | 0 | 512 |
| Total | 105,527 | 66,179 | 39,348 |
Social sustainability
Alleima prioritizes being a responsible employer. The company strives to offer a safe and inclusive workplace where employees thrive and grow.
Alleima has a workforce of approximately 6,800, including employees and third-party workers, in more than 25 countries. It is crucial for the company’s long-term success that current and future employees thrive and develop. Alleima strives to offer a diverse and inclusive workplace with market-based remuneration and working conditions. The compensation ratio amounted to 18.6 which corresponded to an increase by 7.5%. Considerable emphasis is placed on creating a safe workplace through preventive efforts to minimize the number of incidents.
Governance and targets
Work is governed by the overall People Policy, which is supported by procedures and processes for various areas. The Board has delegated ownership of the People Policy to the CEO. The policy is broken down and implemented by each division. Several key initiatives were formulated in connection with Alleima’s overall strategy work, and they are continuously followed up.
The HR management team has quarterly follow-ups with the CEO, and the divisions report quarterly to Group Executive Management. Key activities are formulated and followed up on a quarterly basis, based on the company’s strategic focus.
Targets and priorities
| Focus area | Long-term target | Milestones 2024 | Outcome 2024 | Milestones 2025 | Status of long-term target |
| A responsible employer | Reduce TRIFR by more than 50% by 2030, compared with 2019. | TRIFR of 5.3 | TRIFR of 7.1 | TRIFR of 5.3 | Unsatisfactory trend. The trend has been flat in recent years, and an increased injury frequency rate was reported in 2024. |
| The share of female managers will be one-third of the total number of managers by 2030. | 25.6% female managers. | 24.0% female managers. | Target under review | A continued improvement was reported during the year. |
A responsible employer
Health and safety
Alleima has a systematic process to ensure the health and safety of those people working at the Group’s workplaces. The company has implemented a multi-site certification according to ISO 45001 and ISO 14001 that covers each major location and workers that perform work for Alleima at these locations. If a location is not covered by a certified management system, it will instead be covered by a separate procedure under the Sustainability Policy.
Assessing and reducing risks is a part of the company’s everyday work. It is the responsibility of each Alleima unit’s management to ensure that this is carried out. A task-based risk assessment method shall be used to systematically examine a job and identify hazards, evaluate the risks and specify controls. There is a procedure for this work, which also includes requirements that need to be met beyond any local, statutory or legal requirements.
Risk assessments shall be performed by a group of individuals with the necessary expertise, which must include, as a minimum, a trained facilitator, the local manager in charge, and the operator. The risk assessment shall be reviewed and approved by this group plus a health and safety representative, a relevant subject matter expert (if required) and the manager of the process that is being assessed for risk.

Review is conducted continuously to understand the effectiveness of measures and to update local risk assessments. Knowledge exchange between units also takes place through network meetings, where successful practices are shared and examples are presented for discussion. A system has been introduced for the dissemination and sharing of information about incidents and potentially serious incidents to create greater awareness of hazards and incidents that could occur in more than one location within the company.
Alleima has set up health and safety committees at several locations to promote partici-pation and consultation on all levels. Typically, committee representatives include local management, employees and EHS professionals.
In addition to KPIs that measure outcomes, leading indicators are also used. These are intended to measure the progress of local environment, health, and safety plans. The aim is to ensure that each site identifies, formulates and implements improvement measures based on the local risk profile or a shared priority focus area. Hazards and near misses are also measured, as is the percentage of these that have been managed and closed out.
During the year, the TRIFR developed negatively, increasing to 7.1 (6.8). In 2024, 85 injuries were reported among employees and non--employees at Alleima’s locations. A total of 38 lost time injuries were reported for employees and non-employees. The most common accidents were hand and finger injuries. One incident was reported during the year where the GRI criterion for high-consequence injury/illness (defined as absenteeism exceeding six months) was met.
Health and safety training is an important area. The aim is to ensure that everyone who works for Alleima has the relevant skills, know-ledge, competencies, and behaviors to undertake their work safely. The responsible manager ensures that all employees and anyone working on Alleima’s behalf understands their responsibilities and that they have been offered and participated in training as needed.

Diversity
Diversity, equality and inclusion are critical to innovation, business performance and the future success of the company. Alleima works actively to create an inclusive and gender-equal workplace, with zero tolerance for discrimination. All employees should feel valued and be able to achieve their full potential. The company takes measures to promote an inclusive culture and ensure the physical and psychological well-being of its employees.
One focus area involves working proactively to ensure future expertise and diversity by defining new skills and hybrid skills that could be in demand in the future. To assess necessary future skill needs, the talent management work is linked to the overall business strategy and to the global trends and events affecting the company.
Another focus area is increasing diversity and inclusion in recruitment processes. Alleima has developed a tool to support managers in the organization, and the HR function also helps the organization by formulating and managing job listings to promote diversity and inclusion.
Alleima has three leadership programs for developing new leaders as well as experienced managers. Alleima Commit and Elevate is for new managers, Alleima Empower and Advance is for those who have been managers for some time and Alleima Accelerate and GoBeyond is for senior executives. Diversity and inclusion perspectives are a natural part of the structure for every leadership program. Additionally, through the Accelerate and GoBeyond program, Alleima coordinates with the Stockholm School of Economics Executive Education. In 2024, 24 managers completed the Accelerate and GoBeyond program.
Alleima has an ambassador program in Sweden that aims to raise awareness of, and encourage, inclusive behavior. There are also several different initiatives ongoing within the divisions and in different countries to promote diversity and inclusion. One example is in India, where the company offers diversity and inclusion courses in collaboration with Business Sweden.
The company also aims to increase the number of female managers. One way to accomplish this is to provide training in the company’s core values, diversity and inclusion, and psycho-logical well-being in order to promote new ways of thinking, strengthen the organization’s culture, and create networks for women. Alleima’s target is to have one-third female managers by 2030. The share of female managers increased to 24.0% (23.3) in 2024.
Employee engagement
The Alleima Colleague Engagement Survey (ACES) aims to regularly measure employee satisfaction, engagement, and sense of belonging. It provides insights into Alleima’s company performance and enables improvements in identified and prioritized areas. The survey is conducted twice a year.
Inclusion is followed up in the employee survey and, if necessary, measures are taken to improve the company’s initiatives in various employee groups based on the results.
Measures against violence and harassment
Alleima does not accept any form of harassment or bullying. Unreported cases are also identified in employee surveys and other dialogues with employees about their perceptions of the work environment, such as in the ambassador programs for diversity and inclusion. Processes and procedures are in place to address suspected cases of violence and harassment. In 2024, 16 cases of harassment or discrimination were reported through the whistleblower channel, Speak Up. Read more about Speak Up on page 115.
Workers in the supply chain
Alleima also strives to take responsibility for workers in the supply chain. Some of them work in countries with a risk of inadequate or dange-rous working conditions. Alleima also purchases primary materials, such as nickel and molybdenum, that are associated with a high risk of poor working conditions, such as inadequate health and safety measures.
The Supplier Code of Conduct requires suppliers to comply with applicable legislation, including health and safety legislation. Suppliers are also obligated to provide a safe and healthy work environment and to take every possible action to prevent incidents and injuries. Compliance is verified through checkpoints such as risk screening, evaluations and physical audits. Read more about supplier evaluations on page 116.
Reporting principles
Alleima monitors its health and safety performance globally, using a number of KPIs. This includes the lost time injury frequency rate (LTIFR) and TRIFR.
A lost time injury (LTI) is an accident resulting in time away from work, a restricted work injury (RWI) is an injury where the employee can be at work but cannot perform their ordinary work, and a medical treatment injury (MTI) is when the employee requires some kind of medical treatment but can still perform their normal work.
Worked hours are defined as exposure hours, meaning all hours during which employees, contractors and sub-contractors are exposed to the risk of a work-related incident.
The data is derived from our EHS reporting system, where safety-related indicators and exposure hours are recorded on a monthly basis.
The GRI term “high-consequence injury/illness” is incorporated into the KPI for LTI.
The compensation ratio is calculated as the ratio between the highest-paid individual and the median for the company, excluding the highest-paid. Variable components are not included.
Occupational health and safety
| 2024 | 2023 | |||||
| Incidents | Employees | Non- employees | Total workforce | Employees | Non- employees | Total workforce |
| Number of fatal injuries | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Number of LTIs1 | 38 | 0 | 38 | 35 | 1 | 36 |
| LTIFR2 | 3.5 | 0.0 | 3.2 | 3.4 | 1.1 | 3.2 |
| Number of TRIs3 | 85 | 0 | 85 | 73 | 3 | 76 |
| TRIFR4 | 7.9 | 0.0 | 7.1 | 7.1 | 3.2 | 6.8 |
| Million hours worked | 10.794 | 1.251 | 12.045 | 10.313 | 0.940 | 11.253 |
| Hazards | 10,372 | 11,390 | ||||
| Hazards closed out | 9,917 | 10,589 | ||||
| Hazard close out ratio, % | 95.6 | 93.0 | ||||
| Near misses | 1,185 | 1,269 | ||||
| TRIFR by division | 2024 | 2023 |
| Tube | 6.9 | 6.7 |
| Kanthal | 5.8 | 7.0 |
| Strip | 14.5 | 8.2 |
| Common functions | 0.0 | 0.0 |
| Total | 7.1 | 6.8 |
1) Lost time injuries
2) Number of lost time injuries and fatal injuries per million hours worked
3) Total recordable injuries
4) TRIs per million hours worked
Diversity among management and employees
Accounting principles
All personnel statistics (number of employees, age, employment statistics, part-time/full-time, gender, management levels) are retrieved from the company’s global HR system. Values are based on employment rate (FTE). In the reporting, a “manager” is defined as an employee who has personnel responsibility for at least one other employee. Third-party workers are not included in the figures.
| Women | Men | |||
| Board of Directors by gender and age group, number, December 31 | 2024 | 2023 | 2024 | 2023 |
| Under 30 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| 30-50 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 2 |
| Over 50 | 3 | 2 | 7 | 6 |
| Total | 3 | 2 | 8 | 8 |
| Women | Men | |||
| Group Executive Management by gender and age group, number, December 31 | 2024 | 2023 | 2024 | 2023 |
| Under 30 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| 30-50 | 3 | 3 | 2 | 4 |
| Over 50 | 0 | 0 | 5 | 3 |
| Total | 3 | 3 | 7 | 7 |
| 2024 | ||||
| All employees by age group and employee | Under 30 | 30-50 | Over 50 | Share |
| category, and share of women by employee | of women | |||
| category, FTE %, December 31 | ||||
| Group Executive Management (GEM) | 0 | 50 | 50 | 30 |
| Management teams headed by a member of GEM | 0 | 44 | 56 | 51 |
| Other managers | 2 | 55 | 43 | 23 |
| Other staff | 13 | 49 | 38 | 22 |
| Total | 11 | 50 | 39 | 22 |
| 2023 | ||||
| All employees by age group and employee | Under 30 | 30-50 | Over 50 | Share |
| category, and share of women by employee | of women | |||
| category, FTE %, December 31 | ||||
| Group Executive Management (GEM) | 0 | 70 | 30 | 30 |
| Management teams headed by a member of GEM | 0 | 58 | 42 | 44 |
| Other managers | 1 | 56 | 43 | 22 |
| Other staff | 11 | 51 | 38 | 21 |
| Total | 10 | 51 | 39 | 21 |
| 2024 | ||||
| All employees by age group and | Under 30 | 30-50 | Over 50 | Share |
| division, and share of women by | of women | |||
| division, FTE %, December 31 | ||||
| Tube | 12 | 50 | 38 | 19 |
| Kanthal | 11 | 49 | 40 | 26 |
| Strip | 10 | 45 | 45 | 24 |
| Common functions | 8 | 53 | 39 | 42 |
| Total | 11 | 50 | 39 | 22 |
| 2023 | ||||
| All employees by age group and | Under 30 | 30-50 | Over 50 | Share |
| division, and share of women by | of women | |||
| division, FTE %, December 31 | ||||
| Tube | 10 | 52 | 38 | 19 |
| Kanthal | 11 | 49 | 41 | 25 |
| Strip | 8 | 47 | 45 | 23 |
| Common functions | 8 | 56 | 36 | 43 |
| Total | 10 | 51 | 39 | 21 |
Business ethics
Alleima’s policy, Code of Conduct and core values form the basis of its ethical business conduct. All employees, contractors and partners are to comply with legal requirements as well as the company’s ethical standards.
At Alleima, ethical business conduct means a business that is conducted with honesty and integrity, where all employees, contractors and partners comply with legal requirements as well as the highest ethical standards. This is ensured through policies, integrated into core processes and maintained through continuous engagement and training. The company promotes a culture where ethics and compliance are essential to operations at every level of the company.
Governance and targets
Alleima’s Ethics and Compliance Policy has been designed to address legal, regulatory and internal requirements and describes how the company is to incorporate these to achieve compliance. The policy is governed by procedures for specific issues, for example gifts and hospitality and data security.
The Board is responsible for the Ethics and Compliance Policy. Policy revisions are prepared by the Audit Committee and decided by the Board. The company’s compliance function regularly reports to the Audit Committee about the implementation of the policy, including the effectiveness of the entire compliance program. Matters dealt with by the Audit Committee are recorded in minutes and reported to the Board.
To ensure sustainable sourcing, Alleima has a Procurement Policy that is supported by a procedure for evaluating supplier sustainability work. The Procurement Council establishes structures and processes to manage the requirements imposed by the compliance function, the Board and the CEO. Governing documents are managed through the Procurement Council, but there is also scope for local processes. The Procurement Policy is owned by Group Executive Management. For information about other policies, see page 98.
The compliance function establishes the requirements outlined in the Group’s compliance program. These include the identification of risks, policy development, training, controls, audits, reporting, and monitoring. Each division is responsible for implementing the program within its organization. The Group’s compliance function reports to Alleima’s General Counsel.
Employees in the compliance function monitor developments with respect to new legislation and regulations as well as external factors such as geopolitical developments that impact the operations and their governance. Collaboration takes place with external parties as well as internal functions such as the company’s risk management process.
Several systems are used to ensure that Alleima follows all regulations and internal requirements, including controls in production and checking business partners against sanction lists.
The Ethics and Compliance Policy and related procedures regulate how employees are to act, and the policy is further supported by Compliance House, a tool used to monitor effectiveness and performance. By monitoring and analyzing employees’ ethical conduct, the tool supports the organization in identifying and addressing any shortcomings. When shortcomings are identified, measures are taken to ensure that all defined requirements are managed and that there are no issues left unaddressed. Alleima did not receive any sanctions in 2024 for insufficient compliance with laws or regulations related to the program’s six areas, as described below.
Targets and priorities
| Focus area | Long-term target | Milestones 2024 | Outcome 2024 | Milestones 2025 | Status of long -term target |
| Ethical business | Alleima shall have a business ethics and compliance culture evolving with the regulatory standards utilizing technological advancements. | 100% completed evaluations in Compliance House and all cases of non-compliance | 98% of Alleima’s units had completed their evaluation and remedied any cases of non-compliance | 100% completed evaluations of regulatory compliance. | Development and adaptation of the follow-up program for regulatory compliance |
| conduct | have a remedial activity. | All cases of non-compliance to be addressed with remedial actions and a deadline for implementation. | completed. | ||
| All suppliers compliant with the Alleima Supplier Code of conduct by 2030. | 59% of suppliers, based on purchase volume, complied with the Supplier Code of Conduct. | 63% of suppliers, based on purchase volume, complied with the Supplier Code of Conduct. | 69% of suppliers, based on purchase volume, complied with the Supplier Code of Conduct. | Continued progress on the introduction of systematic supplier performance monitoring. |
In August 2024, Alleima was awarded a gold medal by EcoVadis, a leading supplier of sustainability ratings. This prestigious recognition of sustainable business practices places Alleima among the top 5% of the over 130,000 companies assessed around the world.
Ethical business conduct
Compliance
Alleima’s compliance program encompasses six main areas: anti-bribery and corruption, the Speak Up whistleblower mechanism, compe-tition law, trade compliance and sanctions, customs, and data privacy.
Compliance House is used to identify and manage any shortcomings in compliance and business ethics, which also includes sourcing policies. A Compliance House review is carried out annually for the entire business. This involves a comprehensive assessment of the key compliance risks identified for each entity. This review is conducted collaboratively by the entity’s management team and Alleima’s compliance team. Throughout the annual review process, the effectiveness of existing remedial actions was thoroughly assessed.
Any new compliance risks noted were assigned an action plan with a timeline for completion. The results of the audit can also indicate a need for training.
Continuous training is a prerequisite for facilitating successful implementation as well as ensuring employees have the awareness needed to adhere to the compliance program. Compliance training was offered to employees in different formats, including e-learning, webinars, and classroom training. There is also specific training for roles identified as high-risk, for example related to corruption. At year-end, the implementation rate for this training was 84%. Various parts of the organization may also have a need for special training.
SpeakUp
Employees and partners are expected to alert Alleima to any violation of the company’s Codes of Conduct and policies as well as applicable laws and regulations in countries where the company operates. Receiving reports on violations allows Alleima to improve its work environ-ment, reduce its risks and continuously work to be an ethical and sustainable company.
Employees and external stakeholders can file reports through Alleima’s whistleblower service, Speak Up. This online service is owned and managed by the compliance function. All reports received are evaluated and, if necessary, an internal investigation is carried out.
The privacy and integrity of the person reporting the incident are always of the utmost importance. The information reported is kept confidential, and reports can be submitted anonymously if local laws permit. The Ethics and Compliance Policy states that there will be no retaliation taken against an employee or business partner who, in good faith, provides information about a violation. The SpeakUp process follows all applicable whistleblower and data privacy laws, and personal data is deleted in accordance with the General Data Protection Regulation (GDPR) - all to ensure personal data is kept safe.

In 2024, a total of 53 reports were made through the SpeakUp system. See more details in the chart below. Of the 53 matters reported, 26 were predicated for investigation by the business integrity function, 16 were referred back to the relevant manager for appropriate investigation and action, and 11 were recorded but deemed not to require any further action. 48 of the reports had been closed by year-end, while five are still open, ongoing or awaiting appropriate action.
Anti-bribery and corruption
Alleima has business partners in many regions around the world and there is a risk of corruption and bribery in various parts of the company’s value chain. The Group’s compliance work within this area aims to ensure a well-implemen-ted way of working to prevent bribery and corruption from occurring and includes processes and tools to detect and counteract any shortcomings. The principle of the program stems from the US Foreign Corrupt Practices Act, the UK Bribery Act and other national legislation.
It includes risk identification and risk assessment, control elements such as policies, procedures and instructions, and control activities such as record keeping, advice, and support. Training is an important part of the program, as is the process for reporting, following up and carrying out improvement activities.
Competition law
Any violation of competition law could entail a serious impact and financial consequences for Alleima’s brand. The employees involved risk punishment in the form of imprisonment, personal fines, a ban on serving as a director, and disciplinary actions.
As part of its compliance program, Alleima has a common platform aimed at minimizing the risk of a breach of competition law. All employees are individually responsible, as set out in the Code of Conduct, for having a basic understanding of competition law so they can identify situations where issues may occur. Employees in roles where a deeper knowledge of competition law is relevant are also to undergo competition law training every other year to ensure that they have sufficient knowledge.
Trade compliance and sanctions
Alleima moves goods, tangible as well as intangible, domestically and across national borders. When moving goods, it is vital to comply with applicable trade laws and regulations. This reduces the risk of fines, penalties, delays of shipments, loss of export/import privileges, criminal liability, and damage to the Group’s brand.
The Ethics and Compliance Policy and the export control procedure are applicable for all Group companies, and the company has committed to following applicable trade laws and regulations in the countries where it operates. All Alleima businesses, companies, and relevant employees worldwide are to be familiar with and adhere to the content of the policy and procedure covering trade compliance.
Customs compliance
Alleima is a global group with manufacturing and trade operations - and a footprint - in many parts of the world. Our extensive portfolio - made up of different products, including raw material, semi-finished goods, equipment, exhibition materials, and inventories - passes through customs borders every day, all year round. Understanding and complying with customs law is important to reduce the risk of disturbances in the supply chain, penalties, or damage to the reputation of the brand.
The Ethics and Compliance Policy and customs procedure define the important elements of customs compliance, such as product classification, origin determination and utilization of free trade. Other important elements include relevant staff training, documentation, reporting and management of customs agents.
Data privacy
The right to privacy includes an individual’s fundamental right to protection of their personal data. Alleima’s commitment to this fundamental right is expressed in the company’s Code of Conduct and implemented as a part of the Ethics and Compliance Policy. The policy estab-lishes the basic principles and requirements for compliance with data privacy in the Group and applies to all processing of personal data.
Long-term sustainable sourcing
Alleima has thousands of suppliers in nearly 60 countries, from which we source products, materials and services. It is important that our suppliers share the sustainability values that we uphold. Therefore, all our suppliers are expected to commit to, and comply with, Alleima’s Supplier Code of Conduct. Business relationships are built on honesty, trust and cooperation, the company strives to develop transparency around suppliers’ sustainability performance.
Responsibility and governance
Alleima’s Supplier Code of Conduct applies to all suppliers providing products, materials, or services to the company. It contains supplier requirements in areas such as legal compliance, health and safety, human and labor rights, responsible sourcing of minerals and metals, the environment, and business ethics. It also encourages suppliers to adopt climate targets in line with the 2015 Paris Agreement on climate change, and to provide working conditions that enable a healthy work-life balance. The Supplier Code states that suppliers are expected not only to implement the requirements in their own operations, but also to set equivalent requirements in their value chain.
Each division is responsible for ensuring that supplier contacts are managed sustainably. This is followed up regularly in the company's sustainability reviews. It is also important that all employees involved are aware of and understand the requirements in place to maintain sustainable sourcing. In 2024, we continued to train buyers on the Alleima Supplier Code and its requirements as well as the process for supplier sustainability evaluations. Three courses on sustainable sourcing have also been launched.
Responsible supplier management
Through a structured supplier evaluation process, Alleima works to identify, prevent, mitigate and address the supply chain’s negative impacts on the environment and human rights. The process is based on the OECD Due Diligence Guidance for Responsible Business Conduct.
The process follows the sustainability requirements set out in the Supplier Code of Conduct, and suppliers are assessed as to whether or not they meet these requirements. The supplier sustainability evaluation process includes controls such as risk screening, sustainability performance evaluation and audits. The tools for risk screening and sustainability performance evaluation are provided by EcoVadis.
Supplier risk identification
Suppliers are screened for sustainability risks arising from the fact that they operate in a
specific country or industry. This screening covers four areas: environment, labor and human rights, ethics, and sustainable sourcing.
Through the risk screening carried out in 2024, 158 suppliers were identified as having a significant potential negative environmental impact, and 259 were identified as having a significant potential negative social impact.
The largest supplier risks identified relate to, for example, different kinds of raw materials and how they are extracted as well as operations in high-risk countries such as Brazil, China and India.
Assessment and sustainability evaluations
High-risk suppliers are prioritized for sustainability performance evaluation. The evaluation covers energy consumption, emissions, bio-diversity, waste, employee health and safety, social impact, child labor, forced labor, human trafficking, discrimination and harassment, corruption, anti-competitive practices, and more. The assessment is analyzed by EcoVadis, which creates a scorecard showing the suppliers’ performance within the areas.
Supplier audits
Supplier audits are a supplement to the supplier performance evaluation and are conducted by a third party. The extent to which the supplier meets the requirements of the Supplier Code of Conduct is checked during the audit. Audits include document reviews, site visits and interviews with supplier employees.
Management of negative impacts
Deviations and improvement activities are managed through corrective action plans. If necessary, Alleima offers support in establishing improvement activities and provides training to help the supplier improve their understanding of environmental and social matters. If the deviation is too significant or if the supplier does not cooperate, this leads to a risk escalation process whereby the matter is raised internally at Alleima for a decision, for example whether to terminate the partnership. However, Alleima’s initial approach is to always try to solve deviations together with the supplier. No supplier contracts were terminated during the year as a result of identified breaches of the Supplier Code.

Responsible sourcing of minerals and metals
There are major risks related to extracting, trading, exporting, and procuring minerals from conflict and high-risk areas. Alleima is a member of the Responsible Minerals Initiative (RMI), which provides tools and processes for improving compliance and establishing sustainable sourcing processes for minerals originating from conflict or high-risk areas. Alleima sources minerals and metals exclusively from suppliers that are approved in RMI’s third-party review.
To identify, assess and manage risks related to sourcing minerals and metals, Alleima also follows the OECD Guidelines for Due Diligence and takes appropriate measures. The company conducts an annual country-of-origin survey based on OECD guidelines to identify the smelters and refineries linked to the supply chain. Of the suppliers identified in the country-of-origin survey, 100% returned completed documents in accordance with the RMI’s Conflict Minerals Reporting Template.
Alleima’s website includes a statement by the company on responsible sourcing of minerals and metals. The statement, together with Alleima’s Supplier Code of Conduct, forms the basis for responsible sourcing and describes supplier requirements for 3TG (tin, tungsten, tantalum and gold) and cobalt. Of the total primary alloys used in 2024, 3TG accounted for approximately 0%.
| Employees trained in compliance , number per area | Number |
| Anti-bribery and anti-corruption | 584 |
| Trade and sanctions | 74 |
| Competition law | 370 |
| Data privacy | 33 |
| Customs operations and incoterms | 53 |
| Outcome 2024, percentage | |
| of relevant spend | |
| Supplier Code of Conduct signed | 90% |
| by contracted suppliers | |
| Risk-screened suppliers | 87% |
| Complies with requirements of | 63% |
| Supplier Code of Conduct |
| Percentage of buyers who | |
| have attended sustainability courses | |
| Alleima’s Supplier Code of Conduct | 57% |
| and its requirements | |
| Supplier sustainability evaluation | 63% |
| Sustainability for sourcing | 56% |
| Circularity for sourcing | 49% |
| Climate for sourcing | 47% |
| Identified improvement activities | Completed improvement activities | ||||
| Supplier assessments | Number | Environment | Social | Environment | Social |
| Evaluation | 283 | 148 | 164 | 25 | 33 |
| Audit | 6 | 22 | 130 | 5 | 41 |
The EU Taxonomy
The EU Taxonomy is a classification system that aims to identify whether economic activities contribute to achieving the EU’s environmental objectives.
Reporting policies
The following section describes how the KPIs were calculated.
Turnover
Turnover was derived from the consolidated income statement on page 39 and reconciled with reported revenues of the group. Total turnover aligns with revenues in the income statement.
The identification of eligible turnover was determined based on a screening of significant revenue streams that comply with the screening criteria. Manufacture of iron and steel was identified.
Alleima’s steel manufacturing and the reported turnover originating from its supply chain are included based on the fact that they comply with the criteria for the manufacture of iron and steel, including its sub-groups, which for the company include, for example, manufacturing of tube products, precision strip steel, ultra-fine wire for medical devices and material for heating technology. No other activities that generate significant revenue streams comply with any of the classifications listed in the taxonomy. The year-on-year development for revenue-generating activities is presented in Note 2 on page 50.
Capex
Capex was derived from Group Notes 12-14 detailing intangible assets, property, plant and equipment, and leases, on pages 56-58. Capex in the company’s steel manufacturing facility and the units to which it supplies are considered taxonomy-aligned given that they are considered necessary to maintain taxo-nomy-aligned activities. Total capex for the year included reported new acquisitions and business combinations pertaining to intangible assets, excluding goodwill, property, plant and equipment, and leases.
Capex reported as taxonomy-aligned includes plant and machinery, assets under construction, and equipment, tools, fixtures and fittings amounting to SEK 30 million (64), SEK 594 million (398) and SEK 21 million (31), respectively. The difference in taxonomy--aligned capex compared with the previous year is due to production-related capex.
Opex
Opex is determined based on items in the consolidated income statement. Deductions for non-eligible opex have been made. Eligible activities include the steel manufacturing facility and the units in the company to which it supplies.
Opex reported as taxonomy-aligned includes SEK 25 million (9) related to research and development. Other expenses related to service and maintenance of taxonomy-aligned activities include costs for repairs and maintenance, and short-term leases. These are included in an amount of SEK 1,487 million (1,568). The increase was mainly attributable to repairs and main-tenance.
Assessment of compliance with Regulation (EU) 2020/852
The following section summarizes the company’s assessment of its compliance with the regulation, detailing the key aspects of the process to identify and categorize the company’s core operations as generally set out in the EU regulation on the establishment of a framework to facilitate sustainable investment.
The review was conducted to identify taxonomy-eligible activities. The review found that the company’s manufacture of iron and steel meets the criteria as an eligible economic activity. The steel material is manufactured by two subsidiaries. These are classified as manufacturing electric arc furnace (EAF) high-alloy steel, which is a taxonomy-eligible technology. The company further processes the steel material into finished products, which the delegated act describes as sub-groups of the category “manufacture of iron and steel.” The sub-groups are based on the European Statistical Classification of Economic Activities (NACE).
The technical screening criteria for climate change mitigation and the emissions reporting to EU Emissions Trading System (EU-ETS) are aligned. Testing of alignment with the criteria for the EU environmental objective for climate change mitigation was therefore based on reported and verified GHG emissions in the product benchmark.
The subsidiaries that produce steel reported a GHG intensity of 140 kg and 152 kg of CO2 per ton of steel produced, respectively. When tested against the technical screening criteria, both were found to meet the listed thresholds for steel manufactured using an electric arc furnace. To a limited extent, the manufacturing operations are supplied with purchased steel, for which the company has not been able to verify that the technical screening criteria have been met. This share was reported as not taxonomy-aligned.
Alleima is only covered by the environmental objective of making a substantial contribution to climate change mitigation through the economic activity of manufacture of iron and steel. This means that the risk of double counting has been eliminated.
Do no significant harm
Climate change adaptation
A climate change risk analysis and assessment has been carried out. An updated climate change analysis and assessment was carried out during the year. The analysis confirmed that water-related risks, such as flooding during heavy rainfall, constitute the main climate-related risk for steel production.
Sustainable use and protection of water and marine resources
An environmental impact assessment has been carried out in accordance with the Water Framework Directive (2000/60/EC) in connection with the permit application. The identified risks were included as a condition in the permit. All conditions have been met.
Pollution prevention and control
Within the framework of chemical management and the established chemical register, the review showed that no significant amounts of substances listed in Appendix C are used, manufactured or released to the market. The current permit originates from an application that was based on the best available techniques.
Protection and restoration of biodiversity and ecosystems
An environmental impact assessment has been carried out in accordance with 2000/60/EC in connection with the permit application. The identified risks were included as a condition in the permit. All conditions have been met.
Minimum safeguards
Alleima has ensured that it has the governing documents, including policies, procedures and instructions, needed to conduct its business in accordance with established guidelines and principles for companies and human rights. This included examining whether the company has explicitly stated its commitment to comply with these guidelines and principles and whether requirements and expectations are included in the company’s Codes of Conduct for its own operations and the value chain.
Controls have been carried out to ensure that the company’s policy documents and actual procedures comply with the commitments made and that the company’s policies are thus followed. The review concluded that the company’s commitments, governing documents and actual procedures entail that these minimum safeguards have been met.
| Turnover table, 2024 financial year | 2024 | ||
| Economic Activities | Code | Turnover, SEK M |
Proportion of turnover, % |
| A. Taxonomy-eligible activities | |||
| A.1. Environmentally | |||
| sustainable activities (Taxonomy-aligned) | |||
| Manufacture of iron and steel | CCM 3.9 | 17,66 | 90 |
| Turnover of environmentally sustainable activities | 17,66 | 90 | |
| (Taxonomy-aligned) (A.1) | |||
| Of which Enabling | 0 | 0 | |
| Of which Transitional | 17,66 | 90 | |
| A.2 Taxonomy-Eligible but not environmentally | |||
| sustainable activities (not Taxonomy-aligned activities) | |||
| Manufacture of iron and steel | CCM 3.9 | 328 | 2 |
| Turnover of Taxonomy-eligible but not environmentally | 328 | 2 | |
| sustainable activities (not Taxonomy-aligned activities) (A.2) | |||
| A. Turnover of Taxonomy eligible activities (A.1+A.2) | 17,988 | 91 | |
| B. Taxonomy-non-eligible activities | |||
| Turnover of Taxonomy-non-eligible activities | 1,703 | 9 | |
| Total | 19,691 | 100 | |
| Turnover table, 2024 financial year | Substantial Contribution | |||||
| Criteria | ||||||
| Economic Activities | Climate Change Mitigation | Climate Change Adaptation | Water | Pollution | Circular Economy | Biodiversity |
| A. Taxonomy-eligible activities | ||||||
| A.1. Environmentally | ||||||
| sustainable activities (Taxonomy-aligned) | ||||||
| Manufacture of iron and steel | Y | N/EL | N/EL | N/EL | N/EL | N/EL |
| Turnover of environmentally sustainable activities | 90 | - | - | - | - | - |
| (Taxonomy-aligned) (A.1) | ||||||
| Of which Enabling | 0 | - | - | - | - | - |
| Of which Transitional | 90 | |||||
| A.2 Taxonomy-Eligible but not environmentally | ||||||
| sustainable activities (not Taxonomy-aligned activities) | ||||||
| Manufacture of iron and steel | EL | N/EL | N/EL | N/EL | N/EL | N/EL |
| Turnover of Taxonomy-eligible but not environmentally | - | - | - | - | - | |
| sustainable activities (not Taxonomy-aligned activities) (A.2) | ||||||
| A. Turnover of Taxonomy eligible activities (A.1+A.2) | - | - | - | - | - | |
| B. Taxonomy-non-eligible activities | ||||||
| Turnover of Taxonomy-non-eligible activities | ||||||
| Total | ||||||
| Turnover table, 2024 financial year | DNSH criteria | |||||
| (‘Does Not Significantly Harm’) | ||||||
| Economic Activities | Climate Change Mitigation | Climate Change Adaptation | Water | Pollution | Circular Economy | Biodiversity |
| A. Taxonomy-eligible activities | ||||||
| A.1. Environmentally | ||||||
| sustainable activities (Taxonomy-aligned) | ||||||
| Manufacture of iron and steel | - | Y | Y | Y | - | Y |
| Turnover of environmentally sustainable activities | - | Y | Y | Y | - | Y |
| (Taxonomy-aligned) (A.1) | ||||||
| Of which Enabling | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| Of which Transitional | - | Y | Y | Y | - | Y |
| A.2 Taxonomy-Eligible but not environmentally | ||||||
| sustainable activities (not Taxonomy-aligned activities) | ||||||
| Manufacture of iron and steel | ||||||
| Turnover of Taxonomy-eligible but not environmentally | ||||||
| sustainable activities (not Taxonomy-aligned activities) (A.2) | ||||||
| A. Turnover of Taxonomy eligible activities (A.1+A.2) | ||||||
| B. Taxonomy-non-eligible activities | ||||||
| Turnover of Taxonomy-non-eligible activities | ||||||
| Total | ||||||
| Turnover table, 2024 financial year | ||||
| Economic Activities | Minimum safeguards | Proportion of Taxonomy aligned (A.1.) or eligible (A.2.) turnover, 2023 % |
Category enabling activity | Category transitional activity |
| A. Taxonomy-eligible activities | ||||
| A.1. Environmentally | ||||
| sustainable activities (Taxonomy-aligned) | ||||
| Manufacture of iron and steel | Y | 91 | - | T |
| Turnover of environmentally sustainable activities | Y | 91 | ||
| (Taxonomy-aligned) (A.1) | ||||
| Of which Enabling | - | - | - | |
| Of which Transitional | Y | 91 | T | |
| A.2 Taxonomy-Eligible but not environmentally | ||||
| sustainable activities (not Taxonomy-aligned activities) | ||||
| Manufacture of iron and steel | 1 | |||
| Turnover of Taxonomy-eligible but not environmentally | 1 | |||
| sustainable activities (not Taxonomy-aligned activities) (A.2) | ||||
| A. Turnover of Taxonomy eligible activities (A.1+A.2) | 92 | |||
| B. Taxonomy-non-eligible activities | ||||
| Turnover of Taxonomy-non-eligible activities | ||||
| Total |
Y - Yes, Taxonomy-eligible and Taxonomy-aligned activity with the relevant environmental objective.
N - No, Taxonomy-eligible but not Taxonomy-aligned activity with the relevant environmental objective.
N/EL - Not eligible, Taxonomy non-eligible activity for the relevant environmental objective.
EL - Taxonomy-eligible activity for the relevant objective.
| Nuclear and fossil gas related activities | |
| Nuclear energy related activities | |
| 1. The undertaking carries out, funds or has exposures to research, development, demonstration and deployment of innovative electricity generation facilities that produce energy from nuclear processes with minimal waste from the fuel cycle. | No |
| 2. The undertaking carries out, funds or has exposures to construction and safe operation of new nuclear installations to produce electricity or process heat, including for the purposes of district heating or industrial processes such as hydrogen production, as well as their safety upgrades, using best available technologies. | No |
| 3. The undertaking carries out, funds or has exposures to safe operation of existing nuclear installations that produce electricity or process heat, including for the purposes of district heating or industrial processes such as hydrogen production from nuclear energy, as well as their safety upgrades. | No |
| Fossil gas related activities | |
| 4. The undertaking carries out, funds or has exposures to construction or operation of electricity generation facilities that produce electricity using fossil gaseous fuels. | |
| 5. The undertaking carries out, funds or has exposures to construction, refurbishment, and operation of combined heat/cool and power generation facilities using fossil gaseous fuels. | |
| 6. The undertaking carries out, funds or has exposures to construction, refurbishment and operation of heat generation facilities that produce heat/cool using fossil gaseous fuels. |
| Capex table, 2024 financial year | 2024 | ||
| Economic | Code | Capex, SEK M |
Proportion of capex, % |
| Activities | |||
| A. Taxonomy-eligible activities | |||
| A.1. Environmentally | |||
| sustainable activities (Taxonomy-aligned) | |||
| Manufacture of iron and steel | CCM 3.9 | 697 | 55 |
| Capex of environmentally sustainable activities | 697 | 55 | |
| (Taxonomy-aligned) (A.1) | |||
| Of which Enabling | 0 | 0 | |
| Of which Transitional | 697 | 55 | |
| A.2 Taxonomy-Eligible but not environmentally | |||
| sustainable activities (not Taxonomy-aligned activities) | |||
| Manufacture of iron and steel | CCM 3.9 | 15 | 1 |
| Capex of Taxonomy-eligible but not environmentally | 15 | 1 | |
| sustainable activities (not Taxonomy-aligned activities) (A.2) | |||
| A. Capex of Taxonomy eligible activities (A.1+A.2) | 712 | 56 | |
| B. Taxonomy-non-eligible activities | |||
| Capex of Taxonomy-non-eligible activities | 548 | 44 | |
| Total | 1,26 | 100 | |
| Capex table, 2024 financial year | Substantial Contribution | |||||
| Criteria | ||||||
| Economic Activities | Climate Change Mitigation | Climate Change Adaptation | Water | Pollution | Circular Economy | Biodiversity |
| A. Taxonomy-eligible activities | ||||||
| A.1. Environmentally | ||||||
| sustainable activities (Taxonomy-aligned) | ||||||
| Manufacture of iron and steel | Y | N/EL | N/EL | N/EL | N/EL | N/EL |
| Capex of environmentally sustainable activities | 55 | - | - | - | - | - |
| (Taxonomy-aligned) (A.1) | ||||||
| Of which Enabling | 0 | - | - | - | - | - |
| Of which Transitional | 55 | |||||
| A.2 Taxonomy-Eligible but not environmentally | ||||||
| sustainable activities (not Taxonomy-aligned activities) | ||||||
| Manufacture of iron and steel | EL | N/EL | N/EL | N/EL | N/EL | N/EL |
| Capex of Taxonomy-eligible but not environmentally | - | - | - | - | - | |
| sustainable activities (not Taxonomy-aligned activities) (A.2) | ||||||
| A. Capex of Taxonomy eligible activities (A.1+A.2) | - | - | - | - | - | |
| B. Taxonomy-non-eligible activities | ||||||
| Capex of Taxonomy-non-eligible activities | ||||||
| Total | ||||||
| Capex table, 2024 financial year | DNSH criteria | |||||
| (‘Does Not Significantly Harm’) | ||||||
| Economic Activities | Climate Change Mitigation | Climate Change Adaptation | Water | Pollution | Circular Economy | Biodiversity |
| A. Taxonomy-eligible activities | ||||||
| A.1. Environmentally | ||||||
| sustainable activities (Taxonomy-aligned) | ||||||
| Manufacture of iron and steel | - | Y | Y | Y | - | Y |
| Capex of environmentally sustainable activities | - | Y | Y | Y | - | Y |
| (Taxonomy-aligned) (A.1) | ||||||
| Of which Enabling | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| Of which Transitional | - | Y | Y | Y | - | Y |
| A.2 Taxonomy-Eligible but not environmentally | ||||||
| sustainable activities (not Taxonomy-aligned activities) | ||||||
| Manufacture of iron and steel | ||||||
| Capex of Taxonomy-eligible but not environmentally | ||||||
| sustainable activities (not Taxonomy-aligned activities) (A.2) | ||||||
| A. Capex of Taxonomy eligible activities (A.1+A.2) | ||||||
| B. Taxonomy-non-eligible activities | ||||||
| Capex of Taxonomy-non-eligible activities | ||||||
| Total | ||||||
| Capex table, 2024 financial year | ||||
| Economic Activities | Minimum safeguards | Proportion of Taxonomy aligned (A.1.) or eligible (A.2.) capex, 2023 % |
Category enabling activity | Category transitional activity |
| A. Taxonomy-eligible activities | ||||
| A.1. Environmentally | ||||
| sustainable activities (Taxonomy-aligned) | ||||
| Manufacture of iron and steel | Y | 45 | - | T |
| Capex of environmentally sustainable activities | Y | 45 | ||
| (Taxonomy-aligned) (A.1) | ||||
| Of which Enabling | - | - | - | |
| Of which Transitional | Y | 45 | T | |
| A.2 Taxonomy-Eligible but not environmentally | ||||
| sustainable activities (not Taxonomy-aligned activities) | ||||
| Manufacture of iron and steel | 1 | |||
| Capex of Taxonomy-eligible but not environmentally | 1 | |||
| sustainable activities (not Taxonomy-aligned activities) (A.2) | ||||
| A. Capex of Taxonomy eligible activities (A.1+A.2) | 46 | |||
| B. Taxonomy-non-eligible activities | ||||
| Capex of Taxonomy-non-eligible activities | ||||
| Total |
Y - Yes, Taxonomy-eligible and Taxonomy-aligned activity with the relevant environmental objective.
N - No, Taxonomy-eligible but not Taxonomy-aligned activity with the relevant environmental objective.
N/EL - Not eligible, Taxonomy non-eligible activity for the relevant environmental objective.
EL - Taxonomy-eligible activity for the relevant objective.
| Opex table, 2024 financial year | 2024 | ||
| Economic Activities | Code | Opex , SEK M |
Proportion of Opex , % |
| A. Taxonomy-eligible activities | |||
| A.1. Environmentally | |||
| sustainable activities (Taxonomy-aligned) | |||
| Manufacture of iron and steel | CCM 3.9 | 1,512 | 58 |
| Opex of environmentally sustainable activities | 1,512 | 58 | |
| (Taxonomy-aligned) (A.1) | |||
| Of which Enabling | 0 | 0 | |
| Of which Transitional | 1,512 | 58 | |
| A.2 Taxonomy-Eligible but not environmentally | |||
| sustainable activities (not Taxonomy-aligned activities) | |||
| Manufacture of iron and steel | CCM 3.9 | 33 | 1 |
| Opex of Taxonomy-eligible but not environmentally | 33 | 1 | |
| sustainable activities (not Taxonomy-aligned activities) (A.2) | |||
| A. Opex of Taxonomy eligible activities (A.1+A.2) | 1,544 | 59 | |
| B. Taxonomy-non-eligible activities | |||
| Opex of Taxonomy-non-eligible activities | 1,061 | 41 | |
| Total | 2,605 | 100 | |
| Opex table, 2024 financial year | 2024 | ||
| Economic Activities | Code | Opex , SEK M |
Proportion of Opex , % |
| A. Taxonomy-eligible activities | |||
| A.1. Environmentally | |||
| sustainable activities (Taxonomy-aligned) | |||
| Manufacture of iron and steel | CCM 3.9 | 1,512 | 58 |
| Opex of environmentally sustainable activities | 1,512 | 58 | |
| (Taxonomy-aligned) (A.1) | |||
| Of which Enabling | 0 | 0 | |
| Of which Transitional | 1,512 | 58 | |
| A.2 Taxonomy-Eligible but not environmentally | |||
| sustainable activities (not Taxonomy-aligned activities) | |||
| Manufacture of iron and steel | CCM 3.9 | 33 | 1 |
| Opex of Taxonomy-eligible but not environmentally | 33 | 1 | |
| sustainable activities (not Taxonomy-aligned activities) (A.2) | |||
| A. Opex of Taxonomy eligible activities (A.1+A.2) | 1,544 | 59 | |
| B. Taxonomy-non-eligible activities | |||
| Opex of Taxonomy-non-eligible activities | 1,061 | 41 | |
| Total | 2,605 | 100 | |
| Opex table, 2024 financial year | DNSH criteria | |||||
| (‘Does Not Significantly Harm’) | ||||||
| Economic Activities | Climate Change Mitigation | Climate Change Adaptation | Water | Pollution | Circular Economy | Biodiversity |
| A. Taxonomy-eligible activities | ||||||
| A.1. Environmentally | ||||||
| sustainable activities (Taxonomy-aligned) | ||||||
| Manufacture of iron and steel | - | Y | Y | Y | - | Y |
| Opex of environmentally sustainable activities | - | Y | Y | Y | - | Y |
| (Taxonomy-aligned) (A.1) | ||||||
| Of which Enabling | - | Y | Y | Y | - | Y |
| Of which Transitional | - | Y | Y | Y | - | Y |
| A.2 Taxonomy-Eligible but not environmentally | ||||||
| sustainable activities (not Taxonomy-aligned activities) | ||||||
| Manufacture of iron and steel | ||||||
| Opex of Taxonomy-eligible but not environmentally | ||||||
| sustainable activities (not Taxonomy-aligned activities) (A.2) | ||||||
| A. Opex of Taxonomy eligible activities (A.1+A.2) | ||||||
| B. Taxonomy-non-eligible activities | ||||||
| Opex of Taxonomy-non-eligible activities | ||||||
| Total | ||||||
| Opex table, 2024 financial year | ||||
| Economic Activities | Minimum safeguards | Proportion of Taxonomy aligned (A.1.) or eligible (A.2.) Opex , 2023 % |
Category enabling activity | Category transitional activity |
| A. Taxonomy-eligible activities | ||||
| A.1. Environmentally | ||||
| sustainable activities (Taxonomy-aligned) | ||||
| Manufacture of iron and steel | Y | 63 | - | T |
| Opex of environmentally sustainable activities | Y | 63 | ||
| (Taxonomy-aligned) (A.1) | ||||
| Of which Enabling | Y | - | - | |
| Of which Transitional | Y | 63 | ||
| A.2 Taxonomy-Eligible but not environmentally | ||||
| sustainable activities (not Taxonomy-aligned activities) | ||||
| Manufacture of iron and steel | 1 | |||
| Opex of Taxonomy-eligible but not environmentally | 1 | |||
| sustainable activities (not Taxonomy-aligned activities) (A.2) | ||||
| A. Opex of Taxonomy eligible activities (A.1+A.2) | 65 | |||
| B. Taxonomy-non-eligible activities | ||||
| Opex of Taxonomy-non-eligible activities | ||||
| Total |
Y - Yes, Taxonomy-eligible and Taxonomy-aligned activity with the relevant environmental objective.
N - No, Taxonomy-eligible but not Taxonomy-aligned activity with the relevant environmental objective.
N/EL - Not eligible, Taxonomy non-eligible activity for the relevant environmental objective.
EL - Taxonomy-eligible activity for the relevant objective.
About this report
Based on the importance of sustainability and to follow up on Alleima’s performance in this area, the corporate governance and sustainability function was assigned by Group Executive Management to compile this report, to make it publicly available and to have an external party perform a limited assurance on the contents of this report.
This report, published on March 19, 2025, is the third sustainability report published by Alleima as a listed public company. The report has been prepared in accordance with the Global Reporting Initiative, GRI Standards 2021.
In the sustainability report, information on the strategy, management approach, stakeholder dialogues, materiality assessment and sustainability data are presented. See page 100 for the company’s material topics. Reference to the statutory information requirement for sustainability reporting is found on page 32. All subsidiaries are required to report unless otherwise stated.
The information in the sustainability report represents the consolidated outcome for the year 2024 for the Alleima Group unless a specific exception is stated for any of the disclosures. There are no other holdings in associated companies that are of any significance to the outcome of the disclosures in this report. Structural changes in the company could have an impact on quantitative disclosures when these are presented for more than one year. If such impacts were significant, they would be commented on in connection with the disclosure.
An operational control approach was used for consolidations. Acquisitions are included in the data set as soon as they become a subsidiary and have been introduced to the sustainability reporting process. Divestments remain part of the legacy data, and any significant impacts from a divestment would be disclosed separately when applicable.
The figures presented are the accumulated figures for 2024 for all active reporting units unless otherwise stated. For environmental disclosures, the figures are based on a quarterly reporting process that is aligned with the company’s interim reporting process. However, the cut-off for the data included is shifted by one month compared with the calendar year. This means that the full year 2024 is based on data from December 1, 2023-November 30, 2024. For safety data, the indicators are based on a monthly reporting process and the full-year data for 2024 represents the outcome of January 1-December 31, 2024.
Indicators stated as omitted in the GRI content index where the reason is stated as unavailable are explained by the fact that the information was not followed up in full accordance with the definition of the indicator according to GRI. Alleima currently has no plans to adjust the current follow-up.
Reporting is compiled based on the most recently available information, which means that comparative figures may change. No signi-ficant adjustments to historical data have been made.
The report has undergone limited assurance by an independent auditor.
Please contact [email protected] with any questions about the sustainability report.
GRI index
Alleima has reported in accordance with the GRI Standards 2021 for the period January 4, 2024-December 31, 2024.
| GRI standard and disclosure | Location | Requirement omitted | Reason | |
| General disclosures | ||||
| GRI 2: General Disclosures 2021 | ||||
| 2-1 | Organizational details | 43, 72, 79 | ||
| 2-2 | Entities included in the organization’s sustainability reporting | 72, 123 | ||
| 2-3 | Reporting period, frequency and contact point | 43, 123 | ||
| 2-4 | Restatements of information | 123 | ||
| 2-5 | External assurance | 123, 127 | ||
| 2-6 | Activities, value chain and other business relationships | 14, 16, 17, 95 | ||
| 2-7 | Employees | 52, 113 | b | Unavailable |
| 2-8 | Workers who are not employees | Omitted | Unavailable | |
| 2-9 | Governance structure and composition | 79-82, 85-87, 98 | ||
| 2-10 | Nomination and selection of the highest governance body | 80-81 | ||
| 2-11 | Chair of the highest governance body | 81, 85-86 | ||
| 2-12 | Role of the highest governance body in overseeing the management of impacts | 98-99 | ||
| 2-13 | Delegation of responsibility for managing impacts | 98-99 | ||
| 2-14 | Role of the highest governance body in sustainability reporting | 81-82, 98-99 | ||
| 2-15 | Conflicts of interest | 68, 81, 85-87 | ||
| 2-16 | Communication of critical concerns | 84, 98-99, 114-115 | ||
| 2-17 | Collective knowledge of the highest governance body | 81-82, 85-87, 98-99 | ||
| 2-18 | Evaluation of the performance of the highest governance body | 82 | ||
| 2-19 | Remuneration policies | 31, 47-49, 52-53, 85-86, 91-92 | ||
| 2-20 | Process to determine remuneration | 31, 47-49, 52-53, 85-86, 91-92 | ||
| 2-21 | Annual total compensation ratio | 109, 111 | ||
| 2-22 | Statement on sustainable development strategy | 6-7 | ||
| 2-23 | Policy commitments | 83, 98-99, 115-116 | ||
| 2-24 | Embedding policy commitments | 83, 98-100, 114-116 | ||
| 2-25 | Processes to remediate negative impacts | 101, 103-104, 110, 115-116 | ||
| 2-26 | Mechanisms for seeking advice and raising concerns | 115 | ||
| 2-27 | Compliance with laws and regulations | 115 | ||
| 2-28 | Membership associations | Omitted | Unavailable | |
| 2-29 | Approach to stakeholder engagement | 97 | ||
| 2-30 | Collective bargaining agreements | Omitted | Unavailable | |
| Material topics | ||||
| 3-1 | Process to determine material topics | 97 | ||
| 3-2 | List of material topics | 97 | ||
| GRI 205: Anti- corruption 2016 | ||||
| 3-3 | Management of material topics | 96, 98-99, 114-116 | ||
| 205-1 | Operations assessed for risks related to corruption | 115 | ||
| 205-2 | Communication and training about anti-corruption policies and procedures | 115-116 | ||
| 205-3 | Confirmed incidents of corruption and actions taken | 115 | ||
| GRI 301: Materials 2016 | ||||
| 3-3 | Management of material topics | 98-99, 104 | ||
| 301-1 | Materials used by weight or volume | 101, 104, 108 | ||
| 301-2 | Recycled input materials used | 101, 104, 108 | ||
| GRI 302: Energy 2016 | ||||
| 3-3 | Management of material topics | 98-99, 103 | ||
| 302-1 | Energy consumption within the organization | 103, 106 | ||
| 302-3 | Energy intensity | 106 | ||
| GRI 303: Water and Effluents | ||||
| 3-3 | Management of material topics | 98-99 | ||
| 303-1 | Interactions with water as a shared resource | 104, 106 | ||
| 303-2 | Management of discharge-related impacts | 106 | ||
| 303-3 | Water withdrawal | 104, 106 | ||
| 303-4 | Water discharge | 104, 106 | ||
| GRI 305: Emissions 2016 | ||||
| 3-3 | Management of material topics | 98-101, 103 | ||
| 305-1 | Direct (Scope 1) GHG emissions | 101, 103, 104, 107, 111 | ||
| 305-2 | Energy indirect (Scope 2) GHG emissions | 101, 103, 104, 107, 111 | ||
| 305-3 | Other indirect (Scope 3) GHG emissions | 101, 104, 107 | b, c, e | Unavailable |
| 305-4 | GHG emissions intensity | 107 | ||
| 305-7 | Nitrogen oxides (NOx), sulfur oxides (SOx), and other significant air emissions | 104, 107 | ||
| GRI 306: Waste 2020 | ||||
| 3-3 | Management of material topics | 98-99, 101, 104 | ||
| 306-1 | Waste generation and significant waste-related impacts | 104, 108 | ||
| 306-2 | Management of significant waste-related impacts | 104, 108 | ||
| 306-3 | Waste generated | 108 | ||
| 306-4 | Waste diverted from disposal | 108 | ||
| 306-5 | Waste directed to disposal | 108 | ||
| GRI 308: Supplier Environmental Assessment 2016 | ||||
| 3-3 | Management of material topics | 98-100, 114 | ||
| 308-1 | New suppliers that were screened using environmental criteria | 116 | ||
| 308-2 | Negative environmental impacts in the supply chain and actions taken | 116 | ||
| GRI 403: Occupational Health and Safety 2018 | ||||
| 3-3 | Management of material topics | 96, 98-99 | ||
| 403-1 | Occupational health and safety management system | 110 | c | Unavailable |
| 403-2 | Hazard identification, risk assessment, and incident investigation | 110-111 | ||
| 403-4 | Worker participation, consultation, and communication on occupational health and safety | 110-111 | ||
| 403-5 | Worker training on occupational health and safety | 110 | ||
| 403-8 | Workers covered by an occupational health and safety management system | 110 | ||
| 403-9 | Work-related injuries | 110-112 | ||
| GRI 405: Diversity and Equal Opportunity 2016 | ||||
| 3-3 | Management of material topics | 96, 98-99 | ||
| 405-1 | Diversity of governance bodies and employees | 111, 113 | ||
| GRI 406: Non- discrimination 2016 | ||||
| 3-3 | Management of material topics | 96, 98-99, 115 | ||
| 406-1 | Incidents of discrimination and corrective actions taken | 115 | ||
| GRI 414: Supplier Social Assessment 2016 | ||||
| 3-3 | Management of material topics | 98-99 | ||
| 414-1 | New suppliers that were screened using social criteria | 116 | ||
| 414-2 | Negative social impacts in the supply chain and actions taken | 116 |
Auditor’s Limited Assurance Report on Alleima AB (publ) Sustainability Report and statement on the Statutory Sustainability Report
To the annual general meeting of Alleima AB (publ), corporate identity number: 559224-1433
Introduction
We have been engaged by the Board and Group Management Alleima AB (publ) (”Alleima”) to undertake a limited assurance of Alleima’s Sustainability Report for the year 2024. The company has defined the scope of its sustainability report in the list of contents of this document. The statutory sustainability report is defined in the list of contents of this document.
Responsibilities of the Board and Group Management
The Board of Directors and Group Management are responsible for the preparation of the Sustainability Report, including the statutory sustainability report, in accordance with the applicable criteria and the Annual Accounts Act in the older version that applied before 1 July 2024. The criteria are described on the pages 124-126 of the Sustainability Report, and consists of the parts of the sustainability reporting framework issued by the GRI (Global Reporting Initiative) Sustainability Reporting Standards which are applicable to the Sustainability Report, as well as the accounting and calculation principles that Alleima has developed. This responsibility also includes the internal control which is deemed necessary to establish a sustainability report that does not contain material misstatement, whether due to fraud or error.
Responsibilities of the auditor
Our responsibility is to express a conclusion on the Sustainability Report based on the limited assurance procedures we have performed and to provide a statement on the statutory sustainability report. Our assignment is limited to the historical information that is presented and thus does not include future-oriented information.
We conducted our limited assurance engagement in accordance with ISAE 3000 (revised) Assurance Engagements Other than Audits or Reviews of Historical Financial Information. A limited assurance engagement consists of making inquiries, primarily of persons responsible for the preparation of the Sustainability Report and applying analytical and other limited assurance procedures. We have conducted our examination regarding the statutory sustainability report in accordance with FAR’s recommendation RevR 12, the Auditor’s Opinion on the Statutory Sustainability Report. A limited assurance engagement and an examination according to RevR 12 have a different focus and a considerably smaller scope compared to the focus and scope of an audit in accordance with International Standards on Auditing and generally accepted auditing standards in Sweden.
The audit firm applies ISQM 1 (International Standard on Quality Management) and accordingly maintains a comprehensive system of quality control including documented policies and procedures regarding compliance with ethical requirements, professional standards and applicable legal and regulatory requirements. We are independent in relation to Alleima AB according to generally accepted auditing standards in Sweden and have fulfilled our professional ethics responsibility according to these requirements.
The procedures performed in a limited assurance engagement and an examination according to RevR 12 do not allow us to obtain such assurance that we become aware of all significant matters that could have been identified if an audit was performed. The conclusion based on a limited assurance engagement and an examination in accordance with RevR 12, therefore, does not provide the same level of assurance as a conclusion based on an audit has.
Our procedures are based on the criteria defined by the Board of Directors and the Group Management as described above. We consider these criteria as suitable for the prepa--ration of the Sustainability Report.
We believe that the evidence we have ob-tained is sufficient and appropriate to provide
a basis for our conclusion below.
Conclusion
Based on the limited assurance procedures we have performed, nothing has come to our attention that causes us to believe that the Sustainability Report is not prepared, in all material respects, in accordance with the criteria defined by the Board of Directors and Group Management.
A Statutory Sustainability Report has been prepared.
Stockholm, March 13, 2025
PricewaterhouseCoopers AB
Magnus Svensson Henryson, Authorised Public Accountant
This is a translation of the Swedish language original. In the event of any differences between this translation and the Swedish language original, the latter shall prevail.
